This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This dispute has made its way to mainstream news both online and TV and has also sparked debates on socialmedia. Socialmedia debates are also unhelpful. Is it about the exclusive right to use a trademark – “butter chicken” or the “look and feel” of a restaurant? But what exactly is this dispute about?
A SocialMedia Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple socialmedia platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on socialmedia is through copyright. Trademarks.
18, 2021) Doe, a real a **e (“deeply unsympathetic,” to use the court’s terms), advertised “ASU Covid Parties” on a similarly-named Instagram account and spewed a lot of bile as well as, in its first post, using ASU’s colors. The Board sued Doe for trademark infringement and related claims; Doe defaulted.
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
Vogue’s publishers have sued rappers Drake and 21 Savage for unauthorized use of Vogue’s trademarks and false representations in marketing their newest album, “Her Loss”. On November 17, 2022, Drake and 21 Savage agreed to this preliminary injunction and also agreed to stop using Vogue trademarks for their album promotion.
Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! This is a joke, but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen.)
If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s falseadvertising and possibly defamation. Potential irony alert: 50 Cent has taunted Diddy for getting botox … When, if ever, can a company share a photo of a customer/friend on socialmedia without consent? So what exactly are they probative of?
May 19, 2021) Mandabach produces the TV series Peaky Blinders , and it alleged that it owned trademarks and other intellectual property of the show “and certain quotations/sayings/phrases from the show.” Mandabach sued under §43(a) and coordinate state law claims and sought cancellation of a trademark registration.
TTAB says “POTIFY” for a marijuana buying app dilutes (by blurring) the “SPOTIFY” trademark. A click fraud case against a competitor: Motogolf fails to state a falseadvertising claim under the Lanham Act. Trademark lawsuit over MetaBirkins NFTs survives motion to dismiss. Motogolf.com, LLC v.
22, 2022) This is a super messy case with a lot going on; I’m going to blog about it mainly to highlight a new thing you can apparently do with a trademark application , which is use it on non-Amazon platforms to gain advantages. Jones is “a socialmedia influencer, media personality, and celebrity gossip blogger.”
Each webpage that contained one of McCleese’s photos also contained Natorp’s own trademark and copyright symbols at the top and bottom. Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. Now do trademark standing.) McCleese registered copyrights for his photos in 2019.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Until 2017, it also used the hashtag #WGACACHANEL in its socialmedia posts.
As a result, interim orders in trademark infringement cases have become somewhat standardized. Therefore, the right to publicity in the US aims to prevent the unfair appropriation of an individual’s celebrity for commercial gains, indicating a close association with falseadvertising law. In Gautam Gambhir v.
In today’s era of eco-branding, wherein trademarks are used to distinguish sustainable brands from the mainstream commercial ones, the latter engage in the practise of “greenwashing”. For example, socialmedia has been widely discussing the impact of micro-plastics on the environment and contemplating methods to reduce its release.
Advertising can take many forms, including statements about a company’s products on websites and socialmedia platforms. In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. The Ninth Circuit has stated that surveys in trademark cases are to be admitted as long as they are conducted according to accepted principles” and “relevant.” Monster Energy Co. 2022 WL 17218077, No.
21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. Its socialmedia posts featured photos of the Leo’s Loo products, but those posts were tagged, at least in part, with #litterrobot, #LitterRobot, and #litterrobot3.
10, 2023) Nike sued over StockX’s use of Nike trademarks on StockX NFTs without Nike’s consent and alleged sales of counterfeit Nike sneakers despite allegedly guaranteeing that all products sold by StockX were authentic. Nike, Inc. StockX LLC, 2024 WL 3361411, No. 22-CV-0983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Many of the physical items were Nike sneakers.
VPX (Vital) makes BANG, which now contains creatyl-l-leucine (CLL), “a novel ingredient marketed under the trademark ‘Super Creatine.’ … Defendants claim that CLL is more stable and more bioavailable than other forms of creatine.” Here, the court denied Monster’s motion for partial summary judgment on the falseadvertising claim.
Lexmark has crept into §43(a)(1)(A) via false endorsement; it will be interesting to see whether courts recognize that other trademark claims are likewise subject to a proximate cause requirement by that logic. 2021), which considered all these claims except for falseadvertising. The court was guided by Electra v.
A whole industry exists of socialmedia influencers, who create their own content touting products and receive commission on sales of those products that stem from their advertising. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. The report didn’t prove causation.
Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim. Also, the court was “skeptical” that the Rogers framework would apply outside of the context of a trademark claim.” They allegedly watched the movie because they wanted to see De Armas and the scene in the movie.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage socialmediaadvertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. The law on the ownership of a socialmedia pages created by employees for employers is evolving rapidly and varies between jurisdictions.
American Girl applied for trademarks on a space-themed doll named Luciana Vega, which it began marketing in 2018 as its “Girl of the Year” doll. Walkowicz allegedly received multiple emails and social-media messages commenting on the similarities between Walkowicz and Luciana and inquiries about whether they had endorsed the doll.
I also don’t think used, grey market, expired/near expired, repackaged goods, mishandled goods are infringing or counterfeit; the problem if any is that they’re falselyadvertised. User names on socialmedia may or may not include trademarks; user bios give more information. NYU Press, 2016).
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. On several of its websites, LHB also makes representations that it is an “Authorized TASER® Distributor” and that “TASER® is a Trademark of the Mister Stungun.”
14, 2023) Plaintiffs sued defendants for state and federal trademark infringement and related claims. Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing body and league for the sport of axe throwing and uses the trademark “WATL” to market and publicize the axe throwing league. Cold Steel Inc., 2023 WL 2372059, No. Toyota, 610 F.3d
The court certified a question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to socialmedia platforms inherently unknowable for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right to publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?
Grimaldi grounds, the district court’s grant of summary judgment to MTV on the resulting trademark claims. MGFB has a federal registration for FLORA-BAMA for “bar and restaurant services” and several entertainment services, including “social entertainment events,” live musical performances, and “competitions for fish throwing.”
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on socialmedia. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on socialmedia. Are the reports advertisements?
Sonia Katyal, A Trademark Theory of Rebranding Lots of rebranding out there. Alex Roberts, Multi-Level Lies: Distinctive feature is that laypeople are making advertising claims to friends, socialmedia followers, acquaintances, etc. Expand socialmedia monitoring. Fresh start. FTC and FDA think this already!
So too w/falseadvertising. Assumptions skipped over in TM/falseadvertising analysis.] Dustin Marlan, Trademark Disclosure TM registration requires disclosures just as patent does: undertheorized. Keep up with the culture by considering socialmedia. Death closes things off.
The decisions in the first category, i.e., Top 10 IP Cases/Judgements (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.
Across-the-board socialmedia and influencer marketing integration are aspects of the present-day artificiality regarding persuasive brand dissemination in faces and identities. However, it provides both good challenges and opportunities under trademark law. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
Rierson, Trademark Law and the Creep of Legal Formalism Various rules w/in TM law have been codified that we seem to be treating more as formalistic labels or bright line rules when a more practical approach is preferable in TM context instead of leaning on labels. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability?
As alleged in the initial complaint, Charter mailed solicitations whose envelopes “used Windstream’s trademark and copied the same distinct color pattern from Windstream’s current advertising campaign.” On socialmedia: "Were U planning on telling UR customers" [to switch before they lose service]? In re Alert Hldgs.,
Of note because the lawsuit was brought at all, suggesting that trademark owners are willing to try to roll back any First Amendment protections for noncommercial speech. 2012) (use of Louis Vuitton to describe luggage in movie) with approval as non-trademark uses. Pepperdine University v. Netflix, Inc., New Life Art, Inc.,
” “Partner at big law firm focusing on Trademark/Advertising/Online Liability” “I’m a copyright attorney working for Authors Alliance. I think the internet in general an[d] SocialMedia and AI specifically, should be open to the 1st amendment and not interfered by government.
Begin with legislative action: Trademark Modernization Act, Which introduces three of the big themes of the year: (1) trademark use, (2) the harm of infringement, and (3) the role of the First Amendment in limiting the scope of trademark rights. Slides here.
I’m going to talk briefly about last term’s Jack Daniels case—a trademark infringement and dilution case—as well as Elster, argued last week, in which the Justices appeared inclined to reject a First Amendment challenge to the refusal to register the claimed mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for t-shirts. Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content