3 Count: Fan Art
Plagiarism Today
JANUARY 25, 2024
The post 3 Count: Fan Art appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Kat Von D takes the stand in tattoo trial, publishers respond to Anthropic and beIN gets more domains banned in France.
Plagiarism Today
JANUARY 25, 2024
The post 3 Count: Fan Art appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Kat Von D takes the stand in tattoo trial, publishers respond to Anthropic and beIN gets more domains banned in France.
Plagiarism Today
NOVEMBER 21, 2023
The post Another “Magic: The Gathering” Art Plagiarism Scandal appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Wizards of the Coast, the makers of Magic: The Gathering, are at the center of another plagiarism scandal. Here's what happened.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Plagiarism Today
JANUARY 10, 2024
The post Understanding Wizards of the Coast’s New AI Art Debacle appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Wizards of the Coast has found itself at the center of yet another plagiarism scandal, this one involving an AI image in marketing materials.
Patently-O
APRIL 30, 2024
by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. The core task of patent examination is identifying quality prior art.
Hugh Stephens Blog
MARCH 27, 2023
Last fall I wrote about the ongoing problem of trade in fake Indigenous art. This applies to many genres and communities but is a particular problem in the Pacific Northwest, where I live, because of the richness of the art forms and their popularity among the public. (It
Patently-O
JULY 11, 2022
In a new opinion the court asked and answerd an interesting question: What if most on-point prior art was accidentally created due to a typographical error? A key to the analysis was a finding that the error would have been apparent to someone of skill in the art. You can compare the prior art linear objective lens results (Fig.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 21, 2023
It found that the lower court erred by failing to instruct the jury that “comparison prior art” must be tied to the same article of manufacture as that claimed. Regarding the jury instructions on comparison prior art, Columbia argued that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury as to the scope of the comparison prior art.
Let's personalize your content