article thumbnail

Copyright References in the Budget: Good Intentions Are Welcome but Early Action is Needed

Hugh Stephens Blog

Last week I discussed the copyright needle buried in the 2022 Canadian budget haystack, a reference to impending legislation to amend the Copyright Act to fulfill Canada’s obligation under the USMCA/CUSMA to extend its term of copyright protection from the life of the author plus 50 years to “life plus 70”.

Copyright 246
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rebukes Attempt to Incorporate Arguments by Reference to a Related IPR Petition

Intellectual Property Law Blog

In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e). Background Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in Teleflex’s ’116 patent.

Invention 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Additional Remuneration Rights for Online Streaming on Reference to the CJEU

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Image by yousafbhutta from Pixabay On 26 September 2024, the Belgian Constitutional Court referred a highly topical issue of fair remuneration of authors and performers on online streaming platforms to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).

Licensing 123
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Swearing Behind a Prior Art Reference

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Medtronics filed five IPR petitions using the ’355 patent as the primary prior art reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § (“VSI”), asserted that the claimed invention of the challenged patents was conceived in early 2005.

Art 147
article thumbnail

Belgian Constitutional Court refers 13 questions on DSM Directive to the CJEU

The IPKat

The ruling stays the proceedings and refers 13 questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Their claims and the corresponding questions referred to the CJEU are detailed below. 216/1 (case no. 216/2 (cases nos. 7922 and 7925), XI.228/4 228/4 (cases nos. 7922 and 7927), chapter 4/2 (cases nos. 7924 and 7927), XI.228/10

article thumbnail

PTAB Permits Submission of Evidence Midstream to Bolster Public Accessibility of References Despite Objections

JD Supra Law

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has granted a petitioner’s motion to submit supplemental information, over patent owner’s objections, concerning the public availability of references that were relied upon to support grounds of unpatentability in the petition.

Patent 109
article thumbnail

[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark

The IPKat

With this context in mind, it is no wonder that the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal, in Case R 50/2024-2 , concerning the earlier refusal to register the portrait of a Dutch entertainer as an EU trade mark (EUTM), decided to stay the proceedings and refer the matter to the Grand Board.