Preserving Patent Rights: Impact of Public Use on Patenting
JD Supra Law
MARCH 10, 2025
For a business planning to market a product that incorporates an invention, having an enforceable patent to protect the invention is often desirable.
This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
JD Supra Law
MARCH 10, 2025
For a business planning to market a product that incorporates an invention, having an enforceable patent to protect the invention is often desirable.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 26, 2023
What is it that makes a use “public” for purposes of the public use bar? Does it matter whether the person doing the using is a member of the public, as opposed to the inventor? Or does it matter whether the use is itself in public, as opposed to taking place in secret behind closed doors?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
JANUARY 31, 2023
The question became whether the patients could be considered members of the public, and whether their participation in the clinical trial therefore constituted prior public use of the formulation.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
9,186,208 (the ’208 Patent) are anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § This is an appeal from a District of Delaware summary judgment order that held that the asserted claims of U.S. By: Allen & Overy LLP
Garrigues Blog
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
This opposition procedure for European patents is particularly useful when the patent in question is hindering our commercial interests and we have adequate reasons to revoke its registration. One of the most effective ways of obtaining the revocation is to prove “prior public use”. We look at what this consists of below.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
” The invention was not yet “ready for patenting” and therefore its public use was not disqualifying. .” ” The invention was not yet “ready for patenting” and therefore its public use was not disqualifying. It was also pitched to a potential acquirer. Microsoft Corp. ,
IP Watchdog
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday issued a precedential opinion clarifying the requirements for the disclosure of technology that is ready for patenting at a public event to qualify as being “in public use” for purposes of the pre-America Invents Act (AIA) public use bar under 35 USC 102(b).
JD Supra Law
MARCH 7, 2023
Minerva”) had engaged in an invalidating public use more than one year before its patent filing. . On February 15, 2023, the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) affirmed a summary judgment ruling that, by merely showcasing an embodying device at an industry event (the “Event”), Minerva Surgical, Inc. By: Irwin IP LLP
IP Watchdog
OCTOBER 26, 2023
However, fewer startups are aware of the public-use bar and how activities pursued with the goal of growing their businesses may unwittingly invoke it.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
Last week, in a non-precedential opinion for an appeal from a Patent and Trial Appeals Board (PTAB) decision (In re WinGen), the Federal Circuit addressed prior public use under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § By: Womble Bond Dickinson
JD Supra Law
MARCH 27, 2023
clarifying the “in public use” bar under pre-America Invents Act 35 USC 102. Hologic: Background - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion earlier this year in Minerva Surgical, Inc. Hologic, Inc. By: Haug Partners LLP
The IP Law Blog
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
This month the Federal Circuit decided a case involving whether the display of a flowering plant constitutes an invalidating prior public use. A patent applicant is not entitled to a patent when the claimed invention was “in public use… more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States.”
TorrentFreak
NOVEMBER 8, 2024
Five Counts, Various Aspects of Copyright Law Count One: Unauthorized Public Performance and Reproduction Nintendo alleges that the defendant streamed its copyrighted games without authorization, including Mario & Luigi Brothership, Super Mario Party Jamboree, and Super Mario RPG.
Patently-O
AUGUST 5, 2024
The basic holding is that the 102(a)(2)/(b)(2) safe harbor triggered by an inventor’s pre-filing “public disclosure” of the invention requires that the invention be made “reasonably available to the public.” ” Neither public uses nor private sales satisfy this requirement. 333 (1881).
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
9,186,208 on surgical devices for a procedure called endometrial ablation were anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § Hologic, Inc., 2021-2246] (February 15, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. By: Harness IP
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 6, 2023
Here, the Federal Circuit has affirmed that the claims are invalid based upon a pre-filing trade-show display of the ornamental plant — holding that the display counted as a “public use.” ” The inventors here used conventional plant breeding to create a new form of petunia (Calibrachoa). Microsoft Corp.,
TorrentFreak
APRIL 11, 2022
However, piracy remains a concern, particularly in Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines, where more than 60% of the public uses pirate sites. According to CAP, pirate site blocking efforts are also driving traffic to legal sources in other countries in the Asia Pacific region.
JD Supra Law
AUGUST 2, 2024
Summary: An invention is not “publicly disclosed” under 35 USC 102(b)(2)(B) by the inventor’s private sale, even though a private sale may constitute an invalidating “public use” under 35 USC 102(a)(1). Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. By: Knobbe Martens
JD Supra Law
AUGUST 15, 2023
Section 102 of the Patent Act holds that an invention may not be patented if it was in public use before the effective filing date of the patented invention. The public use bar to patenting is triggered if the invention is both “in public use” and “ready for patenting.” By: Cooley LLP
JD Supra Law
DECEMBER 21, 2023
The topics of the key cases included procedure in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appellate Board, the enablement requirement, the calculation of patent term adjustments, the public use bar and the prosecution laches. By: Smith Anderson
JD Supra Law
OCTOBER 3, 2024
16, 2024) - On September 16, 2024, a special master for the Northern District of Georgia issued a report and recommendation to deny Ionic Air Care’s motion for summary judgment that Aviation Clean Air’s patents were invalid under the “public use” and “on-sale” bars to patentability of 35 U.S.C. § By: Irwin IP LLP
IP and Legal Filings
MAY 10, 2024
It’s the first important step towards protecting owner’s rights and its lawful public use. Well, it helps in commercialisation of the invention by allowing its public use. While facilitating technology transfer, it is significant to look at how IP rights play a role. Why must an owner of IP license it?
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 24, 2023
Addressing the public use bar of pre-America-Invents-Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. § Minerva Surgical, Inc.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
This month the Federal Circuit decided a case involving whether the display of a flowering plant constitutes an invalidating prior public use. ” A patent applicant is not entitled to a patent when the claimed invention was “in public use. § 101 rather than a plant patent under 35 U.S.C. §
Copyright Lately
FEBRUARY 2, 2025
public domain this year, with the remaining installments set to follow on January 1, 2026. And as with any character whose earliest stories have entered the public domain, the traits and story elements introduced in those works are free for public use under U.S. for using Tintin, you would lose.
JD Supra Law
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024
102(a)(1) provides, in part, that a person is not entitled to a patent if the claimed invention was in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act provides exceptions for certain disclosures that would otherwise be considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 2] Specifically, 35 U.S.C. §
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 21, 2023
9,186,208 on surgical devices for a procedure called endometrial ablation were anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § The Federal Circuit then pointed out that at the time of the public use, the technology was “ready for patenting.” § 102(b).
IP Law 360
MAY 15, 2024
and European patent decisions — concerning the effect of disclosures in clinical trials on the patentability of products — offers guidance on good practice for companies dealing with public use issues and prior art documents in these commercially important jurisdictions, say lawyers at Finnegan. A comparison of recent U.S.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 17, 2023
This month the Federal Circuit decided a case involving whether the display of a flowering plant constitutes an invalidating prior public use. It’s not surprising to hear talk of flowers in February, but it is unusual when that discussion is in a Federal Circuit opinion. By: Weintraub Tobin
Intellectual Property Brief
MARCH 23, 2023
The public display of simply a prototype of a patentable technology for marketing purposes, over a year prior to its patenting, is enough to rule that the technology is in public use, ready for patenting, and is thus invalid. Minerva Surgical Inc. filed a patent for a medical device called the Aurora. The Aurora is.
The IPKat
JANUARY 16, 2025
The Opponent, Avl List GmbH, challenged the patent's validity based on several grounds, including prior public use as evidenced by a user manual describing the invention.
IPilogue
MARCH 27, 2023
Therefore, although someone may use the original version of Mickey Mouse in a work, they are not able to use this version of Mickey Mouse for any branding purposes or any purpose that would cause consumers to be confused about the source of the Mickey Mouse product.
Patently-O
AUGUST 22, 2022
And, once a patent expires (or is refused or forfeited by public use), the balance allows “free access to copy whatever the federal patent and copyright laws leave in the public domain.” ” Compco Corp. Day–Brite Lighting, Inc. ,
Patently-O
JANUARY 17, 2022
We would require a clear and certain signal from Congress before approving the position of a litigant who, as respondent here, argues that the beachhead of privilege is wider, and the area of public use narrower, than courts had previously thought. No such signal legitimizes respondent’s position in this litigation.”.
The TTABlog
AUGUST 6, 2024
In its genericness analysis the Board relied on dictionary definitions, on third-party usage, and on Shepherd's own use of the proposed mark to refer to a type of product rather than a source. Its finding that the public used the proposed mark generically was supported by substantial evidence. Contrary to C.E.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 9, 2021
The difference now is that they are not simply raising the defense based upon the printed publication but rather are presenting the actual product as prior art based upon it being “in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public.” ” 35 U.S.C.
Patently-O
AUGUST 13, 2021
.” That language has carried through the various major patent law overhauls and continues as a prominent aspect of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1).
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JANUARY 12, 2024
The copyright for Mickey’s debut appearance in the 1928 short film, “Steamboat Willie,” finally expired, allowing a specific portrayal of the beloved character to become available for public use. This momentous occasion follows a prolonged journey shaped by numerous extensions and revisions of copyright laws.
The IPKat
MAY 15, 2023
Further reading Boards of Appeal are competent to overturn a finding of fact at first instance (T 1604/16) Confidentiality restrictions around clinical trials and prior public use (T 0670/20) Proving the existence of confidentiality agreements and the celestial teapot - T 2037/18 Image credit: B Kliban
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 1, 2023
Rose also looked at a Board of Appeal decision that considered whether patients in a clinical trial of a tablet formulation conducted before patent filing could be considered members of the public, and whether their participation in the clinical trial constituted prior public use of the formulation.
IP Law 360
NOVEMBER 14, 2022
The Ninth Circuit on Monday solidified a trademark win by former Politico reporters who started Punchbowl News, ruling that the publication's use of a Boston party and event planning startup's "Punchbowl" trademark is beyond the Lanham Act's scope.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 7, 2021
Novelty: An invention or one very similar to it must already be patented, described in someone else’s patent or patent application, described in a printed publication, on sale, or in public use before the application date (with some exceptions granting the inventor a grace period of one year prior to the application date).
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 7, 2024
against a news publication using the term “Punchbowl,” even though the publication was an expressive work. The Ninth Circuit, relying on Jack Daniel’s, also recently refused to apply Rogers and revived a trademark infringement suit brought by Punchbowl, Inc. Read more
IP and Legal Filings
JULY 8, 2022
b) an industrial design that is contrary to public order or morality.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content