LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2022

Also on the agenda was a policy statement proclaiming that ed tech is a priority area for agency Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) enforcement. Social media companies are warned to look closely at their platform disclosures and whether they are sufficient. The FTC will hold a workshop on this on Oct.

Social Media 52

Social Media Privacy Technology Publishing 52

43(B)log

JUNE 29, 2023

GDPR has become a gold standard but how much do we know about whether it’s enforced or whether it makes any difference in people’s actual level of privacy? US pushes to provide alternative standards—crossborder privacy regulation as an alternative. DSA allows more leeway, again by focusing on process.

Law 40

Law Privacy Social Media Litigation 40

SpicyIP

JUNE 10, 2022

It seeks to support the development of the right to freedom of speech, right to dignity and equality, and the right to privacy in the digital age, through rigorous academic research, policy intervention, and capacity building. Conceptualising and implementing events, workshops, roundtables, etc.

Government 98

Government Social Media Technology Editing 98

43(B)log

JUNE 30, 2023

Chair: Martin Senftleben Impulse Statement: Sebastian Felix Schwemer Recommendation systems; transparency is the approach to recommender systems, which intersects with privacy/data protection. Media pluralism in DSA can be broadened to say there’s value in pluralism generally: DSA doesn’t tell you how to do things.

Law 56

Law Social Media Due Diligence Art 56

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 11, 2021

NY Times : What Happened When Trump Was Banned on Social Media. * NY Times : Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg’s Partnership Did Not Survive Trump. * “ False Accusation: The Unfounded Claim that Social Media Companies Censor Conservatives.” Kate Klonick , Inside the Making of Facebook’s Supreme Court.

Privacy 99

Privacy Social Media Government Confidentiality 99

43(B)log

JUNE 29, 2023

Impulse Statement: Sean Flynn: Data protection can be seen as protecting right to privacy but can interfere with right to research. Duty to protect: duty to regulate third parties—protecting both privacy rights and researchers in data held by third parties. Need balancing/narrow tailoring. Also 4A issues.

Law 59

Law Art Privacy Social Media 59