article thumbnail

Google sues Sonos for Patent Infringement – Again

IPilogue

Most interestingly, Sonos has accused Google of something called efficient infringement. Sonos claims that Google’s infringement of over 100 of Sonos’ patents is deliberate and a business model. Google and Sonos have been trying to one-up each other since the beginning of the pandemic.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Denies Petition to Review CAFC Precedent on Articulating Justification of Primary Reference Selection

IP Watchdog

The petition specifically asked the Court to review the CAFC’s holding that Schwendimann’s argument that “justification for selection of a primary reference is a necessary step to guard against hindsight bias for the motivation to combine references” was unsupported by Federal Circuit case law.

Patent 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Free Speech Right to Accuse Others of Patent Infringement

Patently-O

Decisions of this court lend strong support to the proposition that, “in patent parlance,” at least in an open-ended “comprising” claim, use of “a” or “an” before a noun naming an object is understood to mean to “one or more” unless the context sufficiently indicates otherwise.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Clarifies Standards for Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages

The IP Law Blog

Willful patent infringement can result in enhanced, and in some case treble, damages but not in every instance. Because the standard for finding willful infringement has traditionally been lower than that for enhancing damages, a finding of willful infringement does not guarantee an award of enhanced damages.

article thumbnail

accusing someone of patent infringement can be actionable disparagement if you know the patent's invalid

43(B)log

Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute false advertising.

article thumbnail

Tier I, Tier II, Time for Experts; The Curious Case of Scientific Advisers, Party Expert and Two Tiered Confidentiality Club 

SpicyIP

This case pertains to patent infringement concerning two process patents related to the fungicide Azoxystrobin. The ToR, referred to as the Proposed Consolidated Reference , included provisions for sample collection, testing protocols, and confidentiality measures. vs. GSP Crop Science Private Limited (See here ).

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows “Comparison Prior Art” for Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a design patent infringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.