Remove Moral Rights Remove Public Domain Remove Publishing
article thumbnail

My Concerns with the ‘Can’t Be Evil’ NFT Licenses

Plagiarism Today

Last month, a study published by The Galaxy examined the top 25 most valuable NFT projects and found that, despite many understanding that NFTs transferred either the copyright or the license in the original work, only 1 in 25 of those projects even attempted to do as such. However, the CBE licenses don’t mention moral rights at all.

Licensing 211
article thumbnail

Metadata Ruling Gives YouTube a Timely Boost in Content ID Lawsuit

TorrentFreak

Jackson believes the nature of the platform where the content was published could also provide guidance. Removing a photo’s CMI and putting it on a travel agent’s website would be different from placing it on “some website labeled ‘free public domain pictures here,’ where you’re kind of asking for infringement.”.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Copyright implications of Augmented Reality for cultural goods – Part 1

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The creation of AR experiences may involve acts of reproduction and communication to the public that have potential copyright implications. AR can concern two categories of cultural goods – those that are in the public domain and those embedding a copyrighted work of art. . (i) i) Public domain works. 2022, 618ff.

Copyright 102
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat the past 2 weeks!

The IPKat

The IPKat has published several posts over the past two weeks! COPYRIGHT Katfriend Moritz Sutterer posted on a new competition tool that the German Competition Authority recently tried out against Google in relation to press publishers' neighbouring right.

article thumbnail

Conundrum Involving The Ownership Of The Work Created By Ai

IP and Legal Filings

AI can explore data or information that is accessible in public domain or copyright of other person and can investigate or work upon that information but only to that extent which the software program permits. [3] Therefore, AI may not equipped for generating an original work. Hence, ownership is not granted to the AI.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Universal Copyright Convention – RIP

The IPKat

Instead, international protection of works originating in the USA was obtained in various ways: through bilateral agreements; by means of “backdoor protection” where works were first or simultaneously published in Berne Union countries; and through multilateral conventions.

Copyright 133
article thumbnail

Book Review: Harmonizing Intellectual Property Law for a Trans-Atlantic Knowledge Economy

The IPKat

Ana Lazarova discusses the varied regulations among EU member states concerning neighboring rights and the implications for implementing the new press publishers' right under Article 15 of the DSMD. This model addresses the legal public domain status of both physical and intangible AI creations and inventions.