Remove Moral Rights Remove Ownership Remove Patent
article thumbnail

Book Review: The Artificial Inventor - A Challenge for the Patent System

The IPKat

The challenges presented by this state of affairs, including whether ‘artificial agents’ can be considered inventors, patent their inventions, and enjoy the benefit of patent ownership – and how their inventions would be evaluated against established human rules in the first place, are considered in this book.

Inventor 140
article thumbnail

Book review: Performers' Rights

The IPKat

The book covers the rights of performers, particularly the rights conferred under Part II of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended). Those working in the field of media and entertainment law will no doubt be familiar with Arnold's authorial text on Performer's Rights.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IPSC Breakout Session 3, Language and Authorship/ownership

43(B)log

Ownership should require a lower burden of proof: comes from the relationship between the spouses and not from the connection to the creation. Rosenblatt: compare treatment of inheritance where US © law treats inheritance very differently than many other rights/properties. Gerhardt: compare right of publicity, moral rights?

article thumbnail

Non-fungible Tokens: Commercializing Exclusive Digital Art- A Companion Piece

IPilogue

In this piece, I will recapitulate Strickland- Murphy’s exploration of IP ownership of Non-fungible Tokens and expand on recent developments since May. Given this situation, Ratajkowski’s NFT auction was, as Ratajkowski explains it, an opportunity to reclaim ownership over her photo. What are non-fungible tokens?

article thumbnail

PROTECTING ARCHITECTURAL WORKS IN THE INDIAN IP REGIME

Intepat

Architectural works are also classified as artistic works, and hence, architects and designers are accorded the same rights provided for artistic works under Section 13 and 14 of the Act. Additionally, the architect is also granted moral rights over their work, enabling them to preserve the architectural integrity of the building.

IP 52
article thumbnail

Book review: Intellectual Property Protection for AI-Generated Creations

The IPKat

Ramalho’s structure is simple and clear, two main parts, in two chapters – the first covering AI and copyright, and the second AI and patents – with one agenda, are AI-generated creations protectable? She then analyses relevant parts of copyright and patent protection for AI-generated content under European, US, Australian and Japanese law.

article thumbnail

Generative AI and Copyright

IP and Legal Filings

Is copyright, patent, or trademark infringement applicable to AI creations or not, and who owns the material that AI platforms generate for you or your clients is still an unanswered question. There will be serious consequences for assigning other than human ownership to AI-generated creations.