This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Today, I’m covering AB 2408, a performative “protect kids online” bill that kick kids off socialmedia entirely and ruin the Internet for adults too. Age and identity authentication have numerous downsides and tradeoffs, including creating privacy and security risks for minors.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See The court also found “Ms.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. It is an all-out brawl in federal court, with no-expense-spared battles over each and every picayune litigation issue.
The categorization of socialmedia accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal socialmedia accounts. See Musk, Elon).
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
” * In re: Marriott International Customer Data Security Breach Litig., July 7, 2020): “The privacy policy includes a section titled “Rights of California Residents,” which addresses requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. 2022 WL 822925 (D. March 18, 2022). Gershfeld v. Teamviewer US, Inc.,
2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. “ Privacy. * ” * Williams v.
This case involves augmented reality (AR) effects/”filters” that people can use to doctor up images and videos on socialmedia, such as the ability to add virtual bunny ears, flower crowns, or cat whiskers to people in the image or video. To some privacy lawyers, this is a prima facie violation of BIPA. Martell v.
Not only does fashion enjoy very limited copyright protection in the United States, but Stein is a Chinese company, making any litigation even more difficult. Examples of this can be found almost every time a dress or fashion accessory becomes popular, whether on socialmedia or at various events. Bottom Line.
The term “link taxes” refer to the government compulsion of large Internet services, such as socialmedia or search engines, to pay news media for indexing and publishing their headlines and links. 4) Socialmedia “defective design” lawsuits go forward. #StopTheSADScheme. Does anyone care?
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
Dustin Marlan, The Dystopian Right of Publicity Privacy problems (surveillance) are often analogized to the dystopia of 1984; ROP problems stemming from infinite transferablility can be analogized to Brave New World (1932). Class action ROP lawsuits against socialmedia: result was broader consents in TOS. See her book.
On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. More from our authors: International Cybersecurity and Privacy Law in Practice, Second Edition by Charlotte A.
As a practical matter, given the litigation risks associated with the impact assessments, a business’ lawyers will control those processes–with associated delays, expenses, and prioritization of risk management instead of improving consumer experiences. More generally, consumer subpopulations often have conflicting needs.
If the case stands on appeal, Twitter will write a check to CCDH to compensate it for the litigation harms Twitter has imposed on it. Anti-SLAPP laws are a crucial bulwark against such abuses, especially by billionaires who embrace Pyrrhic litigation with the goal of draining their opponents’ bank accounts. We need more of that.
For trademarks, a good place to start is the company’s marketing and promotional materials, website, mobile app, and socialmedia. Don’t overlook company socialmedia accounts, domain names, and toll-free numbers, which may also serve as potential trademarks. A special note about customer data.
Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Aug. Comments on the California Consumer Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) Rulemaking , May 2022. Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws? . __ (forthcoming 2022).
IP law in publishing, especially at The Globe – who is known for being an early provider of digital media and device-agnostic content delivery – goes far beyond copyright infringement and litigation. Complying with privacy regulations, especially in IT contracts, is as important as it can be misunderstood.
Given that Bill C-11 is short on details, the early conclusion is that leaving implementation to the CRTC combined with a still-secret policy direction is a virtual guarantee for years of hearings, litigation, and Internet regulation framed as “broadcast regulation.” First, regulation of user content. While the Section 4.1
2021 has seen the emergence of a litigation genre against “yearbook” database vendors that publish old yearbooks online. In particular, they are having some success bending Section 230, and this genre offers some interesting considerations for folks paying attention to the privacy/230 borders. Ancestry , Knapke v.
Trends in Litigation Against Big Tech. b) The world’s largest socialmedia, intervened in a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission and 48 U.S. states, for illegal monopolization of the personal social network market, because of the acquisitions of two communication network sites. You can take control of the litigation.
Any legal policy that encourages data snarfing must simultaneously contend with the potentially anti-competitive and anti-social effects of preventing legitimate players from snarfing, along with the potentially massive privacy and security risks that data snarfers create. The parties have vigorously litigated this case.
Simply Life India (2023) (“Anil Kapoor”) (in paragraph 53), wherein the Court, had ruled in favour of safeguarding the distinct personality rights of celebrities, including the rights of endorsement and privacy, against widespread online exploitation and unauthorised commercial use.
However, this case’s litigation approach is problematic. Third, this lawsuit overlaps the broader censorial efforts to impose liability for socialmedia addiction, including an MDL on that topic in the Northern District of California. I share the heartbreak. “Harassment” isn’t always illegal/tortious.
Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/socialmedia (consumers) and social advertising markets. Plaintiffs successfully alleged that “Facebook acquired and maintained monopoly power by making false representations to users about Facebook’s data privacy practices.”
The decisions in the first category , i.e., Top 10 IP Judgments/Orders (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.
Note that Florida’s socialmedia censorship law has relevance to the lost data question, because it says services must “allow a user who has been deplatformed to access or retrieve all of the user’s information, content, material, and data for at least 60 days.”
If youre a victim of the University of Michigan Matt Weiss hacking scandal, discover your legal rights, options for compensation, and how Traverse Legal’s expertise in data privacy, security, and forensics makes our law firm different. Your privacy, security, login information, and well-being may have been severely compromised.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a socialmedia influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
A new track by Drake and The Weeknd is going viral on socialmedia and is bound to top the charts. Data Privacy Data privacy may eventually create a path to protection but this will not come easy. And state or federal laws are unlikely to restrict use of publicly available songs on privacy grounds.
The museum industry, it would seem, is taking note of technology’s growing role in its operations, particularly in regards to visitor engagement and staying relevant in a socialmedia-driven society where declining visitation rates have only been exacerbated by the ongoing pandemic.
At least one judge has defined the boundaries for litigants appearing in his court. Other considerations for legal professionals abound, privacy being salient among them. Finding the balance between those competing interests is always challenging and Generative AI is making it all the more so.
One of the individual defendants is “a socialmedia personality and model who became well-known for her photos and videos, and who has also started an agency to provide management services to other models and influencers.” “Bartlett was upset by the use of her image to endorse a company with whom she was also engaged in litigation.”
They highlight that this failure is typified by the stark realities that have come to light in a pending public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court [BHC], regarding access to life saving drugs. John Doe & Anr. 9 August, 2021]. The Delhi High Court in Star India Pvt.
At least one judge has defined the boundaries for litigants appearing in his court. Other considerations for legal professionals abound, privacy being salient among them. Finding the balance between those competing interests is always challenging and Generative AI is making it all the more so.
Influence of law, desire to contract, social norms. Results: fear of potential litigation motivates permission seeking even when free speech rules would likely allow the use, e.g. in movies. RT: Litigated cases about influencers might have the contracts as part of the record. Video games: want motion capture.
GDPR has become a gold standard but how much do we know about whether it’s enforced or whether it makes any difference in people’s actual level of privacy? US pushes to provide alternative standards—crossborder privacy regulation as an alternative. Leistner: might compare amount of litigation under different regulations, directives.
Don’t assume that Brussels and California effect that occurs w/privacy also occurs when corps can adjust tech granularly. Demands to control socialmedia—take down posts from political rivals, block full services—are common around the world. Bradford’s four examples of the Brussels Effect v.
However, I intend to take broad examples of how social transformation has had an enormous impact on law and how this has affected the public. The two topics are LGBTQ Rights and the Right to privacy. 9] The establishment of LGBTQ Rights in 2014 led up to the formation of the Right to Privacy.
Rivals * MIT Technology Review : This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI (regarding “Nightshade”) Privacy * FTC v. Although this distinction does not eliminate all the privacy concerns voiced by the FTC in this lawsuit, it does lessen the severity of the alleged privacy injury.
The case raised some important discussion topics, but the holding itself was partially limited by the litigation posture. Second, the growing number of plaintiff wins against socialmedia services (even if just overcoming MTDs), such as the addiction and sexual predation cases, are inconsistent with this ruling. Lopez (Cal.
We expect to see an increase in state AGs using the media to showcase “wins” as a way to jump-start campaign efforts. 10: Continued Privacy Patchwork. Indeed, some state enforcers already have criticized this legal framework of privacy rights as inadequate. Prediction No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content