This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Kilpatrick’s Alton Absher and Andie Anderson recently presented “Updates in Standard Essential PatentLicensing and Litigation” at the firm’s annual 2024 Advanced PatentLaw Seminar.
Kilpatrick’s Alton Absher and Andie Anderson recently presented “Updates in Standard Essential PatentLicensing and Litigation” at the firm’s annual 2024 Advanced PatentLaw Seminar.
Intended to offer a thorough introduction to European IP law, the course will be covering key topics like: EU and international legal framework Trade marks and designs, including the EU design reform Geographical indications, including for handicraft products Copyright and the digital age Patentlaw, SPCs, the Unified Patent Court and patentlitigation (..)
2022 is expected to be another busy year in the world of patentlitigation. We fully expect persistence in these spaces: STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENT (SEP) LICENSING AND THE GROWING DEMAND FROM TECH COMPANIES FOR INDUSTRY STANDARDS - After the number of disputes involving SEPs. By: McDermott Will & Emery
Qualcomm had previously sued Apple for patent infringement, and Apple responded with a set of inter partes review petitions. The parties settled the litigation before the IPRs were complete, but agreed that the IPRs could continue. The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents.
Kewalramani), the Central District of California denied Defendant Netflix’s attempts to compel Plaintiff GoTV Streaming to provide documents and further information as to the source of the litigation funding that GoTV received in conjunction with the patentlitigation.
This Kat is delighted to review “ A Practitioner’s Guide to European PatentLaw: For National Practice and the Unified Patent Court ” (Hart Publishing, 2022, 664 pp.). The book consists of seventeen chapters, mainly on substantive law, but it also addresses certain procedural matters and questions of international private law.
case number 19-40643: are patentlaws regarding what constitutes a reasonable royalty applicable to questions of compliance with FRAND-related contractual obligations? Despite these differences, we noted that these two concepts have often been treated interchangeably by courts, often leading to confusing results.
We recently came across one such short paper on “ SEP Litigations & Issues in Determining the FRAND License ” published in the September 2023 issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (see here ) and extended a guest post invitation to its authors to discuss their key arguments.
billion damage award against defendant Intel Corporation because it found plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC had erred on its damages calculation, that one of the asserted patents was not infringed, and that Intel was wrongly barred from raising a defense that it had a newly acquired license to the asserted patents.
One of the most frequent questions I get about getting a patent in China is whether anyone should even bother. Why file a patent overseas when you cannot enforce it? Keep in mind that I am a US patent attorney. Our foreign patent experience has enabled us to counsel our clients on what to expect when filing patents worldwide.
founded in 1993 is a full service Intellectual Property firm manned with professionals in and specializes in the practice of Intellectual Property Laws including Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Copyright, Trade secrets. Majumdar & Co.,
provides a lesson into the importance of carefully drafting—and understanding—the scope of licensing terms, especially covenants not to sue. Background In 2005, AlexSam licensed its prepaid card patents to MasterCard in exchange for ongoing royalties based on the number of “Licensed Transactions.”
It is a prescription drug for treating HIV in adults, available in tablet and injectable forms, and is used in combination with other HIV medicines, currently licensed for treatment, not prevention, due to its high prices. The looming threat is the pending patent applications by Gilead in India.
Expectedly, the decision to remove functionality instead of licensing the patents from Sonos has caused some friction with Google’s customers. But this relationship soured soon after, with Sonos accusing Google of monopolistic practices and of using patentlaws to squash competition from small companies.
All students begin with a solid foundation in intellectual property, data, and competition law , delivered through our Basic Module Curriculum. PatentLaw , European and U.S. Copyright Law , European and U.S. Trademark and Unfair Competition Law , Innovation and Competition Law , and Data Law.
Lemley and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette of Stanford Law School. Two of the most controversial patentlaw changes of the past year have involved obviousness-type double patenting, which allows applicants to patent obvious variants of their earlier patents by disclaiming the extra term of the later-expiring patent.
Merpel does not like this form of taxi Friend of the Kat and Legal Head of Delivery for Gett in Moscow, Konstantin Voropaev has been following some developments out of Kazakhstan relating to an uptick in litigation in the taxi-app space. The patent is valid until 21 December 2023. So what is going on? Let’s start at the beginning.
I was fortunate to have a patient and knowledgeable supervisor in Ben Gray with whom to discuss a number of patent issues involving litigation strategy, biologics, skinny labeling, and means by which pharmaceutical companies seek to extend their commercial monopolies.
Explain whether you have changed your behavior with regard to filing, purchasing, licensing, selling, or maintaining patent applications and patents in the United States as a result of the current state of patent eligibility jurisprudence in the United States.
Pfizer/BioNTech claims that Moderna did not give credit to scientists at Pfizer/BioNTech and NIH who developed the underlying technology and that Pfizer/BioNTech had invented and patented aspects of the technology that Moderna used before it had obtained its patents. Pfizer/BioNTech, of course, declined to take a license.
Accredited European PatentLitigation Certificate Course Trier & Online tutorial - Course start: 25 September 2024; Course end: 16 May 2025 ERA will offer a high-standard course giving patent attorneys the best tools to understand the legal framework and procedural rules necessary to litigate before the UPC.
A core ethical concern behind patenting Metaverse technology is that it would likely result in monopolies of patents, thereby potentially curtailing growth in open, inclusive platforms and even a type of digital divide by excluding the individual who cannot license or purchase patented ideas.
In this episode, Yuri delved into the transformative potential of AI in IP Law, offering a glimpse into the future of this exciting field. Let’s dive into the key points discussed: AI in PatentLaw : Yuri discusses the potential of AI in the field of patentlaw.
While the AmeriKat is still recovering from 2020, her Belgian Katfriends sum-up what was 2022 in Belgian patentlitigation 'Tis the season for a look at the cases that were in 2022 from around Europe and what they mean for the IP litigation themes in those jurisdictions now that the dust has settled in 2023.
In the modern landscape of technological advancement, patent thickets have emerged as a critical concern for innovators, businesses, and policymakers. A patent thicket refers to a dense network of overlapping patents that can complicate the development and commercialization of new products.
INTRODUCTION Oftentimes, it is observed how intellectual property laws, specifically; patentlaws are contradictory to competition and antitrust laws. Patentlaws acknowledge that patents play a crucial role in facilitating the exchange of goods and services.
The appeal judges’ recent decision in favour of Ericsson over HTC endorsed the comparable licensing royalty valuation approach and confirmed such disputes were about breach of contract, not patentlaw.
Even some judges on the Federal Circuit have labeled the eligibility framework as an “incoherent doctrine” [1] that might tempt district courts into “an effective coin toss,” [2] while others have openly confessed that “the nation’s lone patent court … [is] at a loss as to how to uniformly apply § 101.” [3]
In the USA, civil litigation typically involves substantial discovery — with each party demanding to see the other side’s secrets. In patentlaw, these secrets are often at the core of the business process: product development and manufacturing processes, key product details, detailed market and sales data, etc.
The Federal Circuit has repeatedly stated that exercise of personal jurisdiction over a patentee is improper when the company’s only related “contacts were for the purpose of warning against infringement or negotiating license agreements.” Personal Jurisdiction as Not PatentLaw Specific. 3d 1356, 1364 (Fed.
The decision is significant as it is the first by the Fifth Circuit to address the licensing of standards-essential patents and the meaning of “fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (FRAND) licensing terms, adding to the growing body of jurisprudence already issued by the Third, Ninth and Federal Circuits in this area.
This case is China’s first patent linkability case since the implementation of the new Chinese PatentLaw. Patent linkability refers to a newly implemented system of Article 76 of the PatentLaw of the People’s Republic of China. ” The Defendant, Wenzhou Haihe Pharmaceutical Co.,
There has been massive infringement since her patents issued 10-12 years ago. After failed licensing discussions, her company Jump Rope Systems eventually sued Coulter Ventures (owners of Rogue Fitness ) in 2018 for patent infringement. Jump Rope Systems, LLC v. Coulter Ventures, LLC , 18-cv-731 (S.D. ” XY, LLC v.
The decision rejected HTC’s argument that the non-discrimination portion of the FRAND commitment required Ericsson to give HTC the same licensing terms as given larger mobile device manufacturers, because that would convert the ETSI FRAND commitment into a most-favored-licensee approach that ETSI had refused to adopt. per 4G device.
Introduction Patent trolls are entities that do not actively develop their inventions but instead acquire patent rights for obvious inventions to prevent others from working on them or to collect licensing fees. The applicants also demonstrated the obviousness of the respondent’s patent through various prior art references.
Also, Huawei wants to have a strong patent portfolio in the Chinese market where all such measures are more or less beneficial for it. The contention of Samsung was to set a global license rate for Ericsson’s SEP. Image Source: gettyimages]. Chinese market. Meanwhile, Ericsson sued Samsung for breach of FRAND terms.
The appeal judges’ recent decision in favour of Ericsson over HTC endorsed the comparable licensing royalty valuation approach and confirmed such disputes were about breach of contract, not patentlaw.
With deep expertise in litigation and patent prosecution and counseling, the attorneys represent clients across a range of industries and in various legal venues. Newly promoted principals for 2023 are: Ashley Bolt has experience handling complex patent and intellectual property litigation in U.S. District Courts.
Such inventions may be protectable under federal patentlaws. An inventor must secure a patent application within a very short period of time to prevent the work from falling into the public domain. Lastly and most importantly, the company should understand who they are doing business with.
Since living cells and products of nature are often involved in these inventions, clarity regarding patent eligibility is becoming more important. The discovery, development and patenting of biologics has been historically tied to the ‘product of nature’ question under patentlaw. CLS Bank Int’l.
For years, Max Rack sold Max Racks through licensing agreements with defendant Core. Freedom Rack remains the only machine on the market like the Max Rack; the plaintiff has not licensed another producer. Max Rack did not have a “noticeably stronger” “litigating position” given Core’s payment of a lot of profits/royalties before trial.
Article 12, along with the recent amendments to the Patent Rules, restrict the obligation to disclose the “working” statement., This could make it harder to force companies to licensepatents if they are not being used to make affordable products in India. And further restricting policy levers such as compulsory licensing.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content