Law Litigation Patent Law 
IP Watchdog
JANUARY 12, 2022
The question is often discussed in private among patent attorneys who find themselves completely befuddled by the wanton disregard and open duplicitous handling of patent laws by the Nation’s High Court. The whim and fancy – and intellectual dishonesty – of the Supreme Court knows no bounds when it comes to patent law.
The IPKat
MARCH 31, 2025
Trier in summer As readers know, the Katfriends at the Academy of European Law (ERA) in Trier are always busy organizing programmes and courses on all aspects of European law, including IP and digital and IT law. For those looking to get a deep dive in either subject, ERA is organizing two distinct summer courses this year.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
APRIL 8, 2025
in Intellectual Property and Competition Law at Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC) are now open! From Law to Leadership: How the MIPLC LL.M. in Intellectual Property and Competition Law isnt just about gaining legal knowledge. Patent Law , European and U.S. Copyright Law , European and U.S.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 20, 2021
That provision states that an individual’s capacity to sue is determined by “the law of the individual’s domicile.” In patent law, we also have the “ Kessler doctrine,” which sits between the two. The Federal Circuit held that Tormasi lacked the “capacity to sue” under Fed.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 10, 2022
Today in Patent Law Class, we covered the Supreme Court’s important decision in Markman v. 370 (1996) focusing on the question of whether the patentee has a 7th Amendment right to have a jury decide “genuine factual disputes about the meaning of a patent?” by Dennis Crouch. Westview Instruments, Inc.,
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 24, 2022
Qualcomm had previously sued Apple for patent infringement, and Apple responded with a set of inter partes review petitions. The parties settled the litigation before the IPRs were complete, but agreed that the IPRs could continue. The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents. Alice Step 1).
JD Supra Law
JULY 11, 2024
Here, the Intellectual Property Litigation Group offers some of its own reactions to this decision's implications for patent law. Venable has offered general thoughts on the potential fallout from the Supreme Court's reversal of the long-standing Chevron deference, as well as practice area-specific analysis. By: Venable LLP
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
131 
Let's personalize your content