This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
1] And since, the creator, consumer and subject of the content are distinctly different-the potential lack of empathy or misapprehension by the consumers towards the subject, based on the creators potrayal, necessitate a discussion of the subjects privacy and personalityrights.
However, the order was brief and did not specify any statutory or common law basis for the protection of personalityrights, merely citing Titan Industries as precedent. For example, can personalityrights be viewed as an extension of the right to privacy? In Gautam Gambhir v. D.A.P & Co. &
While AI-generated prompts streamline our daily lives, they also pose significant privacy risks. The more streamlined and personalized the responses, the more data is stored in databases, which AI then draws on to create future responses. This data can range from personal to general information. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu.
Introduction Personalityrights refer to a person’s ability to safeguard his or her identity in the context of a property or privacyright. Celebrities value these rights since their names, images, or even voices may be inappropriately used in commercials by various businesses to increase sales.
The development of Artificial Intelligence, from being able to create edited photos to now generating deepfake videos that cannot be distinguished from real videos, has created an imminent threat to intellectual property rights and personalityrights specifically. and includes both commercial and non-commercial aspects.
However, this article will discuss the reasoning of the court with respect to relief claimed by the Plaintiff against a creator of a YouTube video who compiled the interviews of the plaintiff and depicted his personality as ‘thug life’ The plaintiff contended that such videos portrayed him in a derogatory manner. million views.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personalityrights, Govt. Michael Madow, Akshat Agrawal in this three part post lists out where the justifications for these rights fall flat. This and a lot more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review.
ABSTRACT There has been a dramatic increase in the commercial use of celebrity personalities by people not authorized to do so compared to the earlier times. Protecting personalityrights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. Interesting right? Puttaswamy v.
Introduction Although there isn’t a clear legal definition of “privacy,” some legal experts define it as a human right that each and every person has simply by virtue of their existence. The right to privacy must, in other words, be evaluated case-by-case. In the 1962 Kharak Singh v.
Recently, Bollywood Director Karan Johar [1] filed a case against the makers of “Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar” for using his name in the title of their movie without permission, this lawsuit has sparked again the debate relating to personalityrights in India. Topps Chewing Gum Inc. [2]
She is an IP lawyer based out of New Delhi. Previously in 2021, the plaintiff’s interim injunction application had been heard by Justice Sanjeev Narula wherein the Hon’ble Court did not deem fit to pass an injunction on the ground of descendability of publicity rights. [ This guest post is authored by Devangini Rai.
Introduction The media believes that it is their fundamental right to capture and publish all information about celebrities about matters of “public interest” or “public concern” that arise from the “Freedom of the Press” guaranteed by Article 19 of the Constitution.
Continuing our annual tradition of recounting the significant developments that impacted the Indian IP landscape in the year that has been, we bring you a round-up of 2021’s developments. This year, we have divided these developments into three categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgments/Orders (Topicality/Impact).
Junghi Woo is a former IPilogue Content Manager, an IP Innovation Clinic Fellow and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Pina D’Agostino’s Directed Reading: IP Innovation Program course. A personalityright is a proprietary right to recreate one’s self-identity using a person’s name, likeness, image and personality.
However, its specific emphasis on protecting certain elements of the whole scheme of copyrighted content, such as fictional characters and the distinctive personas they embody, has been a focal point, contributing substantially to the discourse surrounding the ever-expanding ambit of copyrightability as well as personalityrights.
Julia is an Associate at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Bengaluru and Snehal is an Associate at Chadha and Chadha IP, Gurugram. Reviving popular artists posthumously, though nostalgic, prompts critical questions about the boundaries around consent, personalityrights, moral rights, economics of the industry, and even ethics.
In August, the Constitution and Human Rights Division of the High Court of Kenya issued a decision on the question of image rights and its relationship with privacyrights and data protection laws in Kenya. However, image rights in Kenya lean more towards a human rights protection regime as opposed to IP law/framework.
Among the many grounds was the court’s refusal to afford post mortem protection to personalityrights of the actor. The plaintiff censured the defendants for violating privacy, right to publicity, free and fair trial, also invoking the Ashok Kumar jurisdiction of the court. Brief facts. Court’s reasoning.
There has been immense activity surrounding the jurisprudence of celebrity rights in India with numerous judicial pronouncements in recent years. In a recent development, the High Court of Delhi confirmed that the publicity rights of individuals are not inheritable and extinguished with the death of the individual/celebrity.
Codible Ventures LLP and Others , the Bombay High Court addressed a legal dispute of infringement of personalityrights through the use of AI. The boundaries of these rights are being pushed in new ways as AI systems now have the ability to create believable images, voices, signatures, photograph and even personae.
Now in its second edition, the book offers a perspective on how one can address the overlap between intellectual property (IP) rights, either to reconcile them in whole or in part, or to pre-empt one over the other. Chapter 20, by Maximilian Becker, addresses the overlap between trade secrets and privacy.
This is a fundamental question when it comes to ensuring the effective protection of rights, including but not limited to IPrights, on the internet. It is also a question without an easy answer, given the conflicting rights and interests that come into consideration and require to be fairly balanced.
Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava. Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava.
Started in 2018, the 2nd edition of Overlapping IPRights (OUP) was brought to completion in 2023 by his co-editor, the inimitable Prof Neil Wilkof, along with Prof Irene Calboli who came on as a co-editor following Prof Basheer’s demise. Therefore, necessitating study of these overlaps in pairs of IPrights as furthered by the book.
Overview of AI and IP Artificial intelligence is a rapidly evolving piece of technology, which has massive impacts on all industries and economies around the globe. The journalist sought a permanent injunction, contending the wrongful use of AI infringed IP and personalityrights. With AI, this aspect has been eradicated.
She highlights that the Court refused to afford post mortem protection to personalityrights of the actor. Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personalityrights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights.
I believe that we should not monopolize information, as various IPrights do today. Information is the main fuel for technological development, which, according to the basic objectives of the treaties, IP should stimulate, not stifle ( TRIPS, Article 7 ). But the world does not end with "creator's rights."
Due to the extent of unlawful activity associated with the petitioner’s name and personality, the court granted a restraining order on 25 th November 2022 against various people and companies. What are Publicity Rights? However, Indian law has indirect references for the protection of publicity rights.
Her area of interest lies in IP and corporate law. Her area of interest lies in IP and corporate law. We also came across the Delhi High Court orders on the interplay between the Patents Act and the Competition Act, and on the inheritability of personalityrights. Hope you enjoy the SpicyIP Weekly review!
[iii] Provisions in Indians Laws Trademarks Act, 1999 does not make any exact provision for publicity rights, but its definition of ‘Marks’ contains names within its ambit. Going ahead in this fast-forwarding world, publicity rights concerning sports in India will develop and can reach a high of excellent dominance like European countries.
This unauthorized usage may also give rise to breaches of confidence or violations of privacy. While economic interests can be quantified and compensated monetarily, non-economic concerns such as privacy violations, damage to reputation, and mental distress may not be entirely redressed through financial means.
On the one hand, there are privacy and data protection concerns, as this is a particularly intrusive form of data processing. As a next step, the SPC Provisions enumerate certain activities that infringe the personalityrights and interests of natural persons. Likewise, many regulatory ventures focus on security.
Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summaries of the posts on Delhi HCs ruling on Celebrity Rights and the Powers of Regional Directors under Companies Act vis a vis Trademark Similarity. The Delhi HC restrained the defendants in both cases from infringing the plaintiffs personalityrights.
However, these rights can be limited by the tattoo bearer’s personalityrights, as seen in some legal cases in Belgium. EXCLUSIONS AND DEFENSES TO IP INFRINGEMENT Several defenses exist for IP infringement in tattoos. Personal use, parody, and incidental inclusion are common defenses.
Keep up with the ever changing world of IP with SpicyIPs Weekly Review! on 07 March 2025 (Bombay High Court) The plaintiff, a notable Hindi film director, filed the suit against the defendants seeking reliefs against the violation of his privacy and personalityrights by the defendants film title Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar.
The court ruled that the tattoo artist did in fact own the copyright in his tattoo design; however, he was limited by the personalityrights of the person he tattooed. Notably, Belgian copyright law includes a statutory right to privacy , which includes the right to control your image.
In addition to trademarks, the players are entitled to certain rights which are covered under the arena of ‘publicity rights’. Therefore, an integral issue that needs to be addressed is whether the personalityrights of a player are infringed by using their names in fantasy sports.
Following a similar line, the Indian courts have decided that while under the Indian Copyright Law, 1957 it is difficult to trace the copyright of voice; however, the right to protection of voice and other personalityrights may be awarded against any use for commercial benefits. Media & Ent.L.J.2024.
Personal Branding. What is Right of Publicity? Who is affected by the Right of Publicity? PersonalRights vs. Property Rights. The implications of the Right of Publicity. The two rights are often confused because they both relate to the control of an individual’s name and image.
Posted In Intellectual Property , Name, Image, and Likeness , Publicity Rights Believe it or not, there are no federal statutes or case laws protecting your exclusive right to the use of your name, image, and likeness (NIL) or any other defining factor of your identity, such as your voice or signature.
He did his LLM from Berkeley Law in 2023 specialising in IP and Tech law. Views expressed here are personal.] “It Protects Their Hard-Earned Reputation” The Claim : Celebrities have valuable personalityrights due to their immense goodwill and reputation. [This three part post is authored by Akshat Agrawal.
In the third part of his three part post on personalityrights, Akshat discusses the real implications of granting broad personalityrights to celebrities. He did his LLM from Berkeley Law in 2023 specialising in IP and Tech law. Part I and II of this post can be accessed here and here.
Bharathwaj is a 3rd year LLB Student at RGSOIPL, IIT Kharagpur, and loves books and IP. Rothman (see here ) called no-privacy-rights-for-the dead doctrine . In this post, I will first discuss the current state of precedents in the context of posthumous rights. His previous posts can be accessed here.
2024 has been an explosive year for IP developments in India, with more IP divisions coming up in different High Courts, an increasing number of IP registrations and an overall higher degree of attention on IP issues in the country. d) Other IP Developments; and e) Other Notable Developments.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content