This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In May 2021, a phenomenal IPilogue submission by Keir Strickland-Murphy (Osgoode Law ‘22) touched on the recent boom of Non- fungibleTokens. In this piece, I will recapitulate Strickland- Murphy’s exploration of IP ownership of Non-fungibleTokens and expand on recent developments since May.
NFTs ( Non-fungibletoken ) are digital assets that represent tangible or intangible items, built on existing or newly-created blockchain networks. Since each NFT has a unique encoding, unlike cryptocurrencies with fungible properties, its denomination is based on the quantity and uniqueness of each item. Introduction.
Parallel to this, Non-FungibleTokens, often known as NFTs, have seen tremendous growth as more and more people enter the market. IP owners must plan and safeguard their unique creation from any prospective infringements because NFTs have a distinguishing trait. [ii] x] Person & Kelley S.
In this paper, it is argued that Private-property law must be the field of law governing transactions involving Non-FungibleTokens. Consequently, the law of property will be invoked more than the law of contract or licencing in the emerging area of non-fungibletokens. 3] MAI Systems Corp. 2d 511 (9th Cir.
Copyright Office published a joint notice of inquiry in the Federal Register announcing that the two agencies would be collaborating on a study regarding intellectual property legal issues related to digital assets known as non-fungibletokens (NFTs).
NFTs are digitally unique “non-fungibletokens,” based on block chain technology, that are used to manage the IP rights of artists in underlying works. The post The Uncharted Legal Territory of Non-FungibleTokens appeared first on Global IP & Technology Law Blog. Read more here.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-FungibleTokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). While the Report is comprehensive, it does not recommend any new action to address IP issues with NFTs.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Copyright Office have published the results of their joint study on non-fungibletokens (NFTs) and intellectual property (IP). The Report was created in response to a June 2022 request from Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) to undertake a study.
The dispute began last year when Tarantino announced that he would sell several non-fungibletokens (NFTs) based on the film Pulp Fiction. First off today, Jack Queen at Reuters reports that Miramax and director Quentin Tarantino have reached a settlement in their dispute over Pulp Fiction-based NFTs.
Carolyn Toto recently joined host Joel Simon on his Industry Insights podcast continue the discussion of non-fungibletokens, related IP ownership issues and more. Joel Simon: Our discussion today is part of a series on non-fungibletokens, known as NFTs.
The rise in the value of crypto currencies in just three years to $3 trillion is vexing to businesses, investors and IP professional who are struggling to understanding where they fit in. The ascendance of non-fungibletokens (NFTs) as an asset class also has caught practically everyone off-guard.
Director Quentin Tarantino’s 1994 Pulp Fiction, considered among the most influential films in modern history, has emerged as a test case of sorts for issuing non-fungibletokens (NFTs) that relate to a copyright-protected work.
On November 23, 2022, the US Patent & Trademark Office and the US Copyright Office announced that they are seeking public input on intellectual property (IP) considerations related to non-fungibletokens (NFTs). By: McDermott Will & Emery
As we’ve explained before, a Non-FungibleToken (NFT) isn’t a form of intellectual property (IP). Instead, it’s more like a receipt for a unique item of IP, to show that you own it – like a pink slip for a car or the deed to a house. By: AEON Law
IBM and IPwe, believe that NFTs, Non-FungibleTokens – one-of-a-kind limited digital editions – can transform stagnant patent monetization into a trillion dollar market. Two IP icons Continue reading.
With the proliferation of non-fungibletokens (“NFTs”), particularly in the art space, an interesting and potentially groundbreaking practice has developed where certain intellectual property (“IP”) pertaining to the NFTs is licensed to the NFT buyers and their subsequent transferees.
This is part 4 of our IP Update series exploring the evolving landscape for Internet, Digital Media and e-Commerce. Overview Non-FungibleTokens (NFTs) continue to generate significant commercial value for brands through the licensing or transfer of intellectual property and commercial rights. By: Smart & Biggar
As the metaverse continues to become a more established marketplace, and consumers become more familiar with non-fungibletokens (NFTs), NFT marketplaces, decentralized domains, bitcoin, crypto wallets and the blockchain, it is no surprise that intellectual property (IP) owners are starting to see an increase in unauthorized uses of their trademarks (..)
A New York federal court has ruled that a non-fungibletoken (“NFT”) for a digital image similar to a Birkin handbag may be an “artistic” work for purposes of determining whether the NFT infringes the Birkin trademark and other IP rights.
On April 3, 2023, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) issued much needed guidance on how digital goods and services – namely non-fungibletokens (NFTs), virtual goods, and services provided in the metaverse – should be classified for trademark purposes.
Concerns have been expressed regarding the legal status and the authenticity of such tokens, especially in India. Author: Ayusman Das, Siliguri, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us at support@ipandlegalfilings.com or IP & Legal Filing. Image source:Gettyimage].
And, in early 2021, the artist Beeple shattered records when the digital art piece Everydays - The First 500 Days sold, as a non-fungibletoken (NFT), at Christie’s for a whopping $69 million in Ethereum cryptocurrency. In 2020, the cryptocurrency market was valued at $1.49 By: Venable LLP
Trademark filings in the metaverse and non-fungibletokens (NFTs) space are a hot topic these days in the media and IP Bar, and many brand owners are asking themselves whether it’s time to join in or risk being left behind.
A company that developed a platform that enables users to display their non-fungibletokens on their watches has sued LVMH in Texas federal court over claims the luxury goods giant infringed on its "pioneering"nonfungible tokens display technology when it allowed NFT displays on its own smartwatches.
In January 2022, StockX announced its plans to launch The Vault, which uses non-fungibletokens (NFTs) to allow buyers to track ownership of physical products resold on its e-market and warrant their authenticity, including Nike shoes.
Although NFTs (non-fungibletokens) have been around since approximately 2014, they exploded into the mainstream in early 2021, fetching eye-popping prices at auction. After Beeple’s March 2021 sale made headlines, the market remained red hot through the rest of that year. million in December 2021.
A New York federal judge has said the Los Angeles-based designer behind the "MetaBirkins" non-fungibletoken can provide permission to a Swedish museum to display his trademark-infringing artwork, despite an injunction barring him from promoting or selling the NFTs.
In 2021, Collins Dictionary named “NFT,” the abbreviation for non-fungibletoken, its word of the year. In 2017, the US-based Association of National Advertisers named AI (artificial intelligence) its marketing word of the year. By: Dentons
Copyright Office issued a Federal Register Notice (Notice) announcing the offices’ joint study of intellectual property (IP) issues related to non-fungibletokens (NFTs). Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the U.S. By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Nonfungibletokens (NFTs) , the latest vehicle for capturing, linking to and licensing intellectual property. The tokenization of digital files so that a single owner of that file can be recorded on the blockchain and identified is an important breakthrough in IP protection. . Does “Fair Use” Apply to NFTs?
Given the recent rise in the popularity and profitability of non-fungibletokens (NFTs), celebrities have entered the market not only by purchasing NFTs, but also by minting their own.
With a market capitalization forecast of over $35 billion for 2022, there is no question that non-fungibletokens (NFTs) are hugely popular. Despite this, the intellectual property rubric underlying these NFT offerings are inconsistent, confusing, and in many cases in conflict with applicable law.
NFTs are digitally unique “non-fungibletokens,” based on block chain technology, that are used to manage the IP rights of artists in underlying works. New and innovative uses for NFTs are arising now across a variety of industries.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-FungibleTokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). While the Report is comprehensive, it does not recommend any new action to address IP issues with NFTs.
Can something called a “Bored Ape” be embodied in a non-fungibletoken (NFT) and be associated with smart contracts? How could this present unique and challenging issues regarding copyright law?
Kilpatrick Townsend’s Rob Potter recently spoke at the Federal Bar Association’s IP Law Fall Conference 2022 on the topic of “NFTs Demystified: Where We Are and Where We’re Going.”
Nikita Munjal is an IP Innovation Clinic Fellow and a third-year JD/MBA Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Pina D’Agostino’s Directed Reading: IP Innovation Program course. Still, the straightforward process for creating non-fungibletokens (NFT) has accelerated the theft of digital art. What Can Be Done?
The ongoing “MetaBirkin” lawsuit is unusual, however, in that it involves a designer brand and two of the latest, trending topics – non-fungibletokens (NFTs) and the metaverse. There are not many trademark cases that are of equal interest to high fashion, the art world and cutting-edge tech.
Luxury fashion brand Hermès won their trademark lawsuit against Mason Rothschild, the creator of the non-fungibletokens (NFT) MetaBirkins, on Wednesday. The trial was the first legal case that tested the bounds of artistic expression in NFTs against the country’s intellectual property laws.
Non-fungibletokens (NFTs), the metaverse, and Web3 bring with them a host of new legal challenges in such areas as IP, securities law, tax, and advertising. As NFTs revolutionize the digital landscape and global economy, it is crucial to stay ahead of the game by remaining informed.
The use of NFTs ("Non-fungibleTokens") can constitute a trademark infringement. This was recently decided by the IP Chamber of the Court of Rome (Tribunale di Roma, decision of 20 July 2022, ref. 32072/2022).
Specifically, the decision tackles the: 1) protection of a non-conventional trade mark such as an (unregistered) colour combination mark; 2) protection of a specific font as either a copyright work or as an unregistered design; 3) cumulation of multiple IP rights on a single product.
Few issues in the world of intangible rights contain as many legal uncertainties as do non-fungibletokens. Non-FungibleTokens (NFTs), ranging from art and literature to fashion and cinema, remain among the hottest legal topics in the world of intangible rights, despite the lack of clear legal regulation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content