IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. Third, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.”. Firstly, Kim et al. Firstly, Kim et al. However, Kim et al.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Image: Thomson Reuters In ‘The Artificial Inventor’ ( Thomson Reuters ), Luz Sánchez García (University of Murcia) characterises humanity as standing at the cusp of an ‘Artificial Invention Age’ in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer used as a tool but rather a creative partner or independent innovator.

Inventor 140

Inventor Invention Patent Ownership 140

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 23, 2025

The court dismissed the conversion claim brought by Mr. Storms, finding it to be preempted by federal patent law. The court also refused to find that Mr. Storms was inventor on patent filed after the summit, which listed Mr. McNamara as an inventor. McNamara, at an industry summit.

Inventor 73

Inventor Patent Law IP Law 73

The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). Unitherm”), argued that it had rights to the patent because its president was an inventor and should be added to the patent. Iolab Corp.

Inventor 110

Inventor Invention Art Patent 110

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 4, 2024

In Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] UKSC 49, the UK Supreme Court ruled that AI cannot be an ‘inventor’ for the purposes of UK patent law.

Inventor 75

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 75

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 4, 2021

But, can an AI be an “inventor” within the meaning of U.S. patent law? We live at a time when Artificial Intelligence (AI) autonomously drives cars, carries on conversations with humans, and in many other ways engages in seemingly intelligent and increasingly even creative acts previously performed only by humans.

Inventor 92

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 92

IIPRD

JANUARY 7, 2025

But it’s now evident that AI is capable of producing inventions on its own, and there have been multiple documented instances of patent applications where the person applying for a patent has recognized AI as the inventor. If such products were created by a human inventor, they could be eligible for patent protection.

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Invention Inventor 98

Patently-O

JUNE 28, 2022

The following year, Congress passed the first patent act that was then signed-into law by President George Washington. The new law eliminated the female pronoun “she.” That said, patenting by women was at an extremely low level. patent system. Burk, Do Patents Have Gender?, 356 (1996); Deborah J.

Patent Law 103

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 103

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

IP Watchdog

JULY 14, 2022

The idea of patented inventions brings to mind machines fully realized - flying contraptions and engines with gears and pistons operating in coherent symphony. AI inventors sound much more like philosophers theorizing about machines, rather than mechanics describing a machine.

Patent Law 137

Patent Law Inventor Patent Invention 137

IP Watchdog

MAY 14, 2023

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) finding that AI cannot be considered a named inventor to a patent application remains the law of the land. The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. Vidal, meaning that the U.S.

Patent Law 128

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 128

LexBlog IP

APRIL 6, 2022

I have been monitoring patent application filing around the world that list “DABUS (the “Device for the Autonomous Bootingstraiming of Unified Sentience”) as the sole inventor. At issue is whether an AI machine alone can be listed as an inventor on a patent application. See Decision re Patent Application No.

Inventor 98

Inventor Patent Application Patent Invention 98

JD Supra Law

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

On 30 July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that a machine – that is, a mathematical equation that analysed and processed data – can be an inventor under Australian patent laws.

Inventor 97

Inventor Patent Law Designs Design 97

Patently-O

APRIL 24, 2023

Vidal , a case involving inventor Dr. Stephen Thaler’s attempt to patent an invention created by his artificial intelligence (AI) system, DABUS. In his petition to the Supreme Court, Thaler asked if the Patent Act restricts the statutory term “inventor” solely to human beings.

Inventor 89

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Application 89

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 6, 2021

Earlier this month, a federal district court issued the first judicial decision in the country addressing whether an AI system can be an "inventor" under U.S. patent law. The decision was rendered by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Thaler v. Hirshfeld on appeal from the U.S.

Inventor 93

Inventor Patent Application Patent Law Trademark 93

Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog

SEPTEMBER 11, 2021

In Thaler , the Court confronted, analyzed and answered the question of “can an artificial intelligence machine be an ‘inventor’ under the Patent Act?” After analyzing the plain statutory language of the Patent Act and the Federal Circuit authority, the Court held that the “clear answer is no.” at *17-18.

Inventor 91

Inventor Intellectual Property Patent Patent Law 91

Intellectual Property Law Blog

OCTOBER 8, 2021

A recent court decision on whether an AI system can be named an inventor in a patent application provides a compelling reason for stakeholders in the artificial intelligence industry to respond to the request. The decision confirms that inventions generated by AI are not eligible for patent protection in the United States.

Inventor 189

Inventor Patent Invention Technology 189

The IPKat

AUGUST 16, 2021

Late last month, South Africa's Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) became the first Patent Office in the world to award a patent that names an artificial intelligence as the inventor of a product. a machine/device) to be named as the inventor in a patent application. What to do.? See Rule 4.1.

Inventor 79

Inventor Patent Application Invention Patent 79

Intepat

APRIL 7, 2025

This system benefits both society and the inventor. The inventor gains the advantage of excluding others from utilizing the invention for a period of 20 years, while the public benefits from the eventual accessibility of the invention once the patent expires.

Patent 52

Patent Inventor Invention Patent Law 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 22, 2022

For our patent law course today, the students read the Justice O’Connor unanimous opinion in Bonito Boats, Inc. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law.

Patent Law 91

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 91

Patently-O

MAY 18, 2023

Although a jury sided with the patentee Amgen, the district court and the Federal Circuit agreed with Sanofi’s contention, ruling that Amgen did not meet the enablement requirement as a matter of law. Sanofi case, while significant, may not come as a surprise to those familiar with the evolution of patent law.

Patent Law 122

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 122

JD Supra Law

JUNE 25, 2024

Following similar decisions in other countries, a Japanese court held for the first time on May 16, 2024, that an inventor in the Patent Act is limited to a natural person and does not include an artificial intelligence ("AI") system. By: Jones Day

Inventor 65

Inventor Patent Law Patent Law 65

The IPKat

JULY 30, 2024

The natural person can then be named an inventor on the patent application. Absent the advent of Artificial General Intelligence, patent inventorship thus remains within the human realm. 2022) found "that only a natural person can be an inventor, so AI cannot be".

Inventor 78

Inventor Invention Designs Design 78

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. Lexmark argued that these restrictions should be enforceable through patent law, similar to the reasoning in A.B.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 111

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 27, 2023

courts and denied patent rights to an artificial intelligence (AI) system. The case demonstrates a global trend in the current patent law regime to deny inventorship to AI systems based on statutory interpretation of “inventor.”. Supreme Court has followed the lead of U.S. By: Ballard Spahr LLP

Inventor 70

Inventor Patent Patent Law Law 70

IP Watchdog

JANUARY 13, 2025

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Monday, January 13, issued a precedential decision denying a state law conversion claim as being preempted by patent law and rejecting BearBox LLC owner Austin Storms bid to be named a sole or joint inventor on Lancium LLCs patent.

Inventor 64

Inventor Patent Patent Law Designs 64

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 25, 2024

An AI system cannot be named as the inventor in a UK patent application – the inventor(s) must be human. Technical developments created by AI cannot be ‘inventions’ within the meaning of UK patent legislation. UK patent law does not allow patents to be granted in respect of inventions made autonomously by machines.

Inventor 68

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent Law 68

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

During IPWatchdog LIVE 2021 in Dallas, Texas, I asked a handful of willing attendees for their thoughts on the impact of the America Invents Act (AIA) in anticipation of today, the ten-year anniversary of the day President Barack Obama signed the AIA into law. patent laws. innovation.

Invention 124

Invention Inventor IP Patent Law 124

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. By: Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Inventor 68

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Law 68

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 8, 2022

The August 2019 announcement that two patent applications had been filed naming an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm as an inventor in the United States and a dozen other countries was regarded as disruptive and profound at the time. It was one of the hot topics in patent law during those last few months before the pandemic.

Non-Fungible Tokens 119

Non-Fungible Tokens Inventor Patent Application Patent Law 119

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

Apotex ], I have decided to look at precedence from around the world where courts have contemplated recognizing artificial intelligence (AI) technology as an “inventor.” However, this 2002 decision did not define whether AI technology can be an inventor. The judge stated that DABUS is not the inventor and cannot be the inventor.

Technology 111

Technology Inventor Patent Patent Law 111

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.

Inventor 122

Inventor Invention IP Ownership 122

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 21, 2022

Vidal: "Whether an artificial intelligence can be an inventor for purposes of patent law, which implicates the most fundamental aspects of patent law, namely, the nature of inventorship and therefore whether AI discoveries can be patented." Question presented in Thaler v.

Inventor 53

Inventor Intellectual Property Patent Law Invention 53

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Reversing what seemed like a victory for supporters of AI-owned intellectual property, the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia has confirmed the majority view of the world: only human inventors can own patent rights to their creations. What Does This Mean in the Canadian Context? In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,

Invention 110

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 110

JD Supra Law

MARCH 26, 2025

The United States patent system underwent a significant change with the enactment of the First-Inventor-to-File (FITF) provision of the America Invents Act, which became effective on March 16, 2013. The FITF provision transitioned the United States from a First-to-Invent system to a First-Inventor-to-File system.

Patent Law 59

Patent Law Inventor Invention Law 59

JD Supra Law

APRIL 19, 2022

Over the past few years technology evangelist and inventor Stephen Thaler, together with the Artificial Inventor Project, has campaigned for patent law changes across jurisdictions to recognize artificial intelligence (AI) as an inventor on patent applications. By: Foley & Lardner LLP

Inventor 97

Inventor Patent Application Patent Law Technology 97

Patently-O

JANUARY 7, 2023

I just gave a short (45 min) talk about the past year in patent law. See the slides here: Patent Year in Review. Patents as Commodity : Many folks are treating it as such. Who is the Inventor : AI and Corporation as the inventor. by Dennis Crouch. Broad IPR Estoppel : CalTech v. Broadcom/Apple.

Patent Law 56

Patent Law Law Patent Inventor 56