The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2023

In order to understand whether a purported technical effect may be relied on for inventive step, the EBA concludes that the substantive question remains what would the skilled person understand from the application as filed? For the EBA, the substantive question at the heart of G 2/21 is a familiar one that needs no reference to plausibility.

Invention 131

Invention Publishing Patent Art 131

Patently-O

MARCH 11, 2022

DABUS created two separate inventions — a “Neural Flame” and “Fractal Container.” Thaler filed for patent protection, but refused to name himself as the inventor — although he created DABUS, these particular inventions did not originate in his mind. Thaler created an AI system that he calls DABUS. Thaler Brief.

Inventor 127

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 127

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. Soon thereafter, the “Oldfield Bill” proposed a number of limitations on patent rights.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 111

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued guidance on the patentability of inventions developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, saying that a human must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention.

Invention 109

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 109

IP Watchdog

JULY 14, 2022

The idea of patented inventions brings to mind machines fully realized - flying contraptions and engines with gears and pistons operating in coherent symphony. The AI inventor’s ways are antithetical to the principles of patent writing, where inventions are described in terms of what does what, why, how, and how often.

Patent Law 137

Patent Law Patent Inventor Invention 137

Patently-O

AUGUST 4, 2021

Ryan Abbott, have made headlines around the world as they sought patent protection for a fractal-inspired beverage container (shown below) that they contend was invented by DABUS. Does substantive South African patent law preclude AI inventorship? Was granting the patent a mistake? Stephen Thaler and Prof.

Invention 128

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 128

Patently-O

MAY 18, 2023

The Patent Act requires that patent applicant describes the invention in explicit terms to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. In other words, the specification must enable the full scope of the invention as defined by its claims. 405 (1908) (“[T]he claims measure the invention.”).

Patent Law 122

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 122

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 5, 2021

Commissioner of Patents , case number VID 108 of 2021, in the Federal Court of Australia, an Australian Federal Judge became the first known jurist to rule that inventions developed by artificial intelligence can qualify for patent protection. In Thaler v. And, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.

Invention 98

Invention Inventor Patent Moral Rights 98

Patently-O

MAY 10, 2022

DABUS apparently created two inventions–a “neural flame” and a “fractal container.” Rather, he says that it was DABUS who did the inventing. But, the PTO refused to issue the patent without a human listed inventor. be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.”

Invention 100

Invention Inventor Patent Litigation 100

Patently-O

AUGUST 22, 2022

For our patent law course today, the students read the Justice O’Connor unanimous opinion in Bonito Boats, Inc. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law.

Patent Law 91

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 91

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. Stephen L.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Patently-O

JUNE 28, 2022

When the Patent Act of 1790 refers to inventors, it lists gender inclusive forms of “he, she, or they:” [The inventor(s) must] set[] forth, that he, she, or they , hath or have invented or discovered any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any improvement therein… Patent Act of 1790.

Patent Law 103

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 103

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § See also Mohapatra v. Hirshfeld (pro se). PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v.

Patent Law 106

Patent Law Law Patent Art 106

JD Supra Law

MARCH 29, 2022

(Part 1 of a 4 Part Series) - The application of innovative data driven approaches such as bioinformatics and artificial intelligence to the life science sector has brought about a change in way that biological inventions can be protected by patent laws.

Invention 95

Invention Patent Application Patent Law Business 95

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 21, 2023

The Federal Circuit disagreed and noted that in any event, a reference does not teach away if it merely expresses a general preference for an alternative invention but does not criticize, discredit or otherwise discourage investigation into the invention claimed (citing UCB, Inc. Actavis Laby’s UT, Inc. , 4th 679, 692 (Fed.

Patent Law 147

Patent Law Patent Law Art 147

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch Berkely Center for Law & Technology is hosting a great half-day virtual-conference this week: “AI as an Inventing Tool – it’s Implications for Patent Law” organized by Prof. Rob Merge s, Dr. Yuan Hao (PhD), and Prof. Colleen Chien.

Invention 69

Invention Patent Law Law Art 69

Intepat

JANUARY 15, 2024

This section mandates that a patent applicant must identify the inventor and, if the applicant is not the inventor, explain how they derived the right to the patent. Mr. Thaler’s stance was clear: DABUS, as the AI behind the inventions, should be recognized as the inventor.

Inventor 94

Inventor Patent Law Invention Law 94

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 30, 2024

Patent enthusiasts will be excited to know that a comprehensive commentary on Patent Law, authored by Adarsh Ramanujan (incidentally, a former blogger with SpicyIP), is set to be released on December 4, 2024! The book is published collaboratively by Oakbridge Publishing Pvt. The panel will feature Justice Prathiba M.

Patent Law 59

Patent Law Law Patent Publishing 59

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

In this 2-part post, in part I, I will be analyzing the suggested amendments to Section 3 of the Patents Act (the substantial provisions) and part II will cover the suggested amendments to some of the procedural provisions of the Act. Section 3 of the Patents Act creates a list of restrictions on what inventions are not patentable.

Reporting 108

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 108

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2023

The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21 related to the evidence requirement for a purported technical effect relied on for inventive step. The Board of Appeal in T 2803/18 , in particular, highlights how G 2/21 may be relevant to inventions in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Invention 98

Invention Art Patent Reporting 98

Patently-O

DECEMBER 5, 2021

Crunch admits that all of the elements of his invention were individually available in the prior art. In particular, mini-trampolines with handles were already available, as were touch screens for displaying real-time instructions.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Law Patent Art 111

JD Supra Law

MARCH 25, 2024

have shed further light on the intersection of patent law and artificial intelligence (AI), particularly with respect to whether AI-generated inventions can be patented. Two recent developments, one in the U.S. and one in the U.K., By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Patent Law 74

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 74

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? It may surprise you, then, to learn that the genre of science fiction is deeply indebted to patent law and patent theory. See [link].

Patent Law 96

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 96

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. By: Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Inventor 69

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Law 69

Patently-O

APRIL 29, 2024

by Dennis Crouch Ikorongo Technology has filed a petition for certiorari asking the Supreme Court to overturn the Federal Circuit’s heightened disclosure standard for the “same invention” requirement in reissue patents. The petitioner argues that the Federal Circuit’s test, established in Antares Pharma, Inc.

Invention 81

Invention Patent Law Technology 81

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 4, 2024

In Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] UKSC 49, the UK Supreme Court ruled that AI cannot be an ‘inventor’ for the purposes of UK patent law.

Inventor 76

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 76

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 25, 2024

An AI system cannot be named as the inventor in a UK patent application – the inventor(s) must be human. Technical developments created by AI cannot be ‘inventions’ within the meaning of UK patent legislation. UK patent law does not allow patents to be granted in respect of inventions made autonomously by machines.

Inventor 69

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent Law 69

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

A significant portion of the suggested reforms to the Patents Act is dedicated to recommendations on loosening the procedural norms of patent filing and patent examination. It is also an aspect that figures mostly at the end of the innovation cycle and not at the beginning.

Reporting 136

Reporting Patent Law Patent Application Patent 136

Patently-O

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Today in Patent Law Class, we covered the Supreme Court’s important decision in Markman v. 370 (1996) focusing on the question of whether the patentee has a 7th Amendment right to have a jury decide “genuine factual disputes about the meaning of a patent?” by Dennis Crouch. Westview Instruments, Inc.,

Patent Law 97

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 97

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 11, 2023

By: Linda Liu & Partners

Invention 72

Invention Patent Application Ownership Patent 72

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 4, 2022

Lincoln listed the development of patent laws—along with the invention of writing and the discovery of America—among the most important events in world history. Patents have “peculiar value…in facilitating all other inventions and discoveries,” he said in a speech in 1858. But a recent ruling by the U.S.

Invention 140

Invention Inventor Patent Law Technology 140

JD Supra Law

NOVEMBER 21, 2024

of the Chinese Patent Law prescribes that: inventiveness means that, as compared with the prior art, the invention has prominent substantive features and represents a notable progress. Article 22.3 By: Linda Liu & Partners

Invention 72

Invention Art Patent Law Law 72

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has recently set a course for the intellectual property landscape with its further guidance on AI-assisted inventions, as outlined in the Federal Register notice. By: Brooks Kushman P.C.

Invention 66

Invention Intellectual Property Patent Law Trademark 66

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.

Inventor 122

Inventor Invention IP Ownership 122

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 7, 2023

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the remarkable ability to develop novel solutions to problems, and patent law has historically protected those solutions. Under current statutes and jurisprudence, however, only humans can invent new and useful devices that receive patent protection.

Invention 74

Invention Patent Patent Law Law 74

Patently-O

JULY 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch If you break it down far enough, every invention is simply a combination of known materials or steps. In Axonics, the court ruled that the obviousness analysis must focus on the motivation to combine references to reach the claimed invention, not motivation to combine for some other purpose described in the prior art.

Invention 75

Invention Art Patent Patent Law 75

Intellectual Property Law Blog

OCTOBER 8, 2021

Hirshfeld , the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia concluded that an AI system cannot be an “inventor” under the Patent Act. The decision confirms that inventions generated by AI are not eligible for patent protection in the United States. See Thaler v. Hirshfeld et al. Civil Action No.

Inventor 189

Inventor Patent Invention Technology 189