Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2022

Patent Law, because the U.S. Patent Act was amended in 2011 to expressly require that inventors be “individuals.” In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. The word individual is important for U.S. 35 U.S.C. § 100(f) (2022).

Invention 100

Invention Inventor Patent Law Patent 100

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 3, 2021

Recently, AI technology once again exceeded the legal community’s expectations by filing a patent for its invention of interlocking food containers. Under patent law, it is the general expectation that inventors are humans, not robots. Patent Law in Canada. Why is this an issue? v Wellcome Foundation Ltd.

Inventor 105

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 105

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

During IPWatchdog LIVE 2021 in Dallas, Texas, I asked a handful of willing attendees for their thoughts on the impact of the America Invents Act (AIA) in anticipation of today, the ten-year anniversary of the day President Barack Obama signed the AIA into law. patent laws. innovation.

Invention 124

Invention Inventor IP Patent Law 124

The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2023

In order to understand whether a purported technical effect may be relied on for inventive step, the EBA concludes that the substantive question remains what would the skilled person understand from the application as filed? For the EBA, the substantive question at the heart of G 2/21 is a familiar one that needs no reference to plausibility.

Invention 131

Invention Publishing Patent Art 131

Patently-O

MARCH 11, 2022

DABUS created two separate inventions — a “Neural Flame” and “Fractal Container.” Thaler filed for patent protection, but refused to name himself as the inventor — although he created DABUS, these particular inventions did not originate in his mind. Thaler created an AI system that he calls DABUS. Thaler Brief.

Inventor 127

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 127

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. Soon thereafter, the “Oldfield Bill” proposed a number of limitations on patent rights.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 111

IP Watchdog

JULY 14, 2022

The idea of patented inventions brings to mind machines fully realized - flying contraptions and engines with gears and pistons operating in coherent symphony. The AI inventor’s ways are antithetical to the principles of patent writing, where inventions are described in terms of what does what, why, how, and how often.

Patent Law 137

Patent Law Inventor Patent Invention 137

Patently-O

AUGUST 4, 2021

Ryan Abbott, have made headlines around the world as they sought patent protection for a fractal-inspired beverage container (shown below) that they contend was invented by DABUS. Does substantive South African patent law preclude AI inventorship? Was granting the patent a mistake? Stephen Thaler and Prof.

Invention 128

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 128

Patently-O

MAY 18, 2023

The Patent Act requires that patent applicant describes the invention in explicit terms to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. In other words, the specification must enable the full scope of the invention as defined by its claims. 405 (1908) (“[T]he claims measure the invention.”).

Patent Law 122

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 122

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 5, 2021

Commissioner of Patents , case number VID 108 of 2021, in the Federal Court of Australia, an Australian Federal Judge became the first known jurist to rule that inventions developed by artificial intelligence can qualify for patent protection. In Thaler v. And, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.

Invention 98

Invention Inventor Patent Moral Rights 98

Patently-O

MAY 10, 2022

DABUS apparently created two inventions–a “neural flame” and a “fractal container.” Rather, he says that it was DABUS who did the inventing. But, the PTO refused to issue the patent without a human listed inventor. be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.”

Invention 100

Invention Inventor Patent Litigation 100

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 11, 2024

recent circular on procurement of drugs, non-obviousness test under the patents law, and the Hamburg Regional Court’s decision in Robert Kneschke v LAION e.V. Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personality rights, Govt. Anything we are missing out on?

Personality Rights 104

Personality Rights Trademark Social Media Government 104

Patently-O

AUGUST 22, 2022

For our patent law course today, the students read the Justice O’Connor unanimous opinion in Bonito Boats, Inc. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law.

Patent Law 91

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 91

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. Stephen L.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Patently-O

JUNE 28, 2022

When the Patent Act of 1790 refers to inventors, it lists gender inclusive forms of “he, she, or they:” [The inventor(s) must] set[] forth, that he, she, or they , hath or have invented or discovered any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any improvement therein… Patent Act of 1790.

Patent Law 103

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 103

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued guidance on the patentability of inventions developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, saying that a human must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention.

Invention 109

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 109

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § See also Mohapatra v. Hirshfeld (pro se). PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v.

Patent Law 106

Patent Law Law Patent Art 106

JD Supra Law

MARCH 29, 2022

(Part 1 of a 4 Part Series) - The application of innovative data driven approaches such as bioinformatics and artificial intelligence to the life science sector has brought about a change in way that biological inventions can be protected by patent laws.

Invention 95

Invention Patent Application Patent Law Business 95

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 21, 2023

The Federal Circuit disagreed and noted that in any event, a reference does not teach away if it merely expresses a general preference for an alternative invention but does not criticize, discredit or otherwise discourage investigation into the invention claimed (citing UCB, Inc. Actavis Laby’s UT, Inc. , 4th 679, 692 (Fed.

Patent Law 147

Patent Law Patent Law Art 147

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch Berkely Center for Law & Technology is hosting a great half-day virtual-conference this week: “AI as an Inventing Tool – it’s Implications for Patent Law” organized by Prof. Rob Merge s, Dr. Yuan Hao (PhD), and Prof. Colleen Chien.

Invention 69

Invention Patent Law Law Art 69

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

In this 2-part post, in part I, I will be analyzing the suggested amendments to Section 3 of the Patents Act (the substantial provisions) and part II will cover the suggested amendments to some of the procedural provisions of the Act. Section 3 of the Patents Act creates a list of restrictions on what inventions are not patentable.

Reporting 108

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 108

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2023

The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21 related to the evidence requirement for a purported technical effect relied on for inventive step. The Board of Appeal in T 2803/18 , in particular, highlights how G 2/21 may be relevant to inventions in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Invention 98

Invention Art Patent Reporting 98

Intepat

APRIL 7, 2025

INTRODUCTION Patent legislation offers legal safeguarding for novel inventions once they have been patented by their creators. A patent , essentially a temporary monopoly, is bestowed upon the owner in exchange for disclosing the invention to the public. This system benefits both society and the inventor.

Patent 52

Patent Inventor Invention Patent Law 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 5, 2021

Crunch admits that all of the elements of his invention were individually available in the prior art. In particular, mini-trampolines with handles were already available, as were touch screens for displaying real-time instructions.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Law Patent Art 111

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Thaler’s application for his AI, DABUS, to be the patent owner of an invention titled “ Food container and devices and methods for attracting enhanced attention ,” a product solely created by DABUS without any human interference. What Does This Mean in the Canadian Context? In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,

Invention 110

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 110

Intepat

JANUARY 15, 2024

This section mandates that a patent applicant must identify the inventor and, if the applicant is not the inventor, explain how they derived the right to the patent. Mr. Thaler’s stance was clear: DABUS, as the AI behind the inventions, should be recognized as the inventor.

Inventor 94

Inventor Patent Law Invention Law 94

Patently-O

APRIL 29, 2024

by Dennis Crouch Ikorongo Technology has filed a petition for certiorari asking the Supreme Court to overturn the Federal Circuit’s heightened disclosure standard for the “same invention” requirement in reissue patents. The petitioner argues that the Federal Circuit’s test, established in Antares Pharma, Inc.

Invention 81

Invention Patent Law Technology 81

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

A significant portion of the suggested reforms to the Patents Act is dedicated to recommendations on loosening the procedural norms of patent filing and patent examination. It is also an aspect that figures mostly at the end of the innovation cycle and not at the beginning.

Reporting 136

Reporting Patent Law Patent Application Patent 136

Patently-O

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Today in Patent Law Class, we covered the Supreme Court’s important decision in Markman v. 370 (1996) focusing on the question of whether the patentee has a 7th Amendment right to have a jury decide “genuine factual disputes about the meaning of a patent?” by Dennis Crouch. Westview Instruments, Inc.,

Patent Law 97

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 97

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 18, 2025

Unity of invention and double patenting law and practice in Canada can create challenges for patent applicants. By: Smart & Biggar

Invention 68

Invention Patent Patent Application Patent Law 68

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 11, 2023

By: Linda Liu & Partners

Invention 68

Invention Patent Application Ownership Patent 68

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 19, 2024

Many courts tried to determine whether a software invention is abstract by devising several tests to determine whether any invention related to computers might be patentable. So far, there remains no valid test, set of rules, body of practice, or body of decisions that could determine patent eligibility.

Technology 52

Technology Invention Patent Intellectual Property 52

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 4, 2022

Lincoln listed the development of patent laws—along with the invention of writing and the discovery of America—among the most important events in world history. Patents have “peculiar value…in facilitating all other inventions and discoveries,” he said in a speech in 1858. But a recent ruling by the U.S.

Invention 140

Invention Inventor Patent Law Technology 140

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 24, 2025

Patents constitute a fundamental element within intellectual property alongside other types since they safeguard innovative inventions. Obtaining a patent grants the inventor the right to stop all unauthorized uses of their invention that include making or using or selling or distributing it.

Invention 52

Invention IP Intellectual Property Cease and Desist 52

JD Supra Law

MARCH 25, 2024

have shed further light on the intersection of patent law and artificial intelligence (AI), particularly with respect to whether AI-generated inventions can be patented. Two recent developments, one in the U.S. and one in the U.K., By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Patent Law 71

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 71

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.

Inventor 122

Inventor Invention IP Ownership 122

Patently-O

JULY 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch If you break it down far enough, every invention is simply a combination of known materials or steps. In Axonics, the court ruled that the obviousness analysis must focus on the motivation to combine references to reach the claimed invention, not motivation to combine for some other purpose described in the prior art.

Invention 75

Invention Art Patent Patent Law 75