Invention Patent Application Public Use Reference 
Patently-O
MAY 19, 2022
Since the patents here are pre-AIA, we focus on the old Sections 102(a) and 102(b): Pre-AIA 102. A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —. (a) a) the invention was … patented or described in a printed publication … before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or. (b)
Trading Secrets
APRIL 18, 2023
API access data policy is different, stating that customer data is not used for training/tuning the model, but is kept for up to 30 days for abuse and misuse monitoring. API access refers to access via ChatGPT’s API, which developers can integrate into their applications, websites, or services. enablement).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2023
API access data policy is different, stating that customer data is not used for training/tuning the model, but is kept for up to 30 days for abuse and misuse monitoring. API access refers to access via ChatGPT’s API, which developers can integrate into their applications, websites, or services. enablement).
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2023
API access data policy is different, stating that customer data is not used for training/tuning the model, but is kept for up to 30 days for abuse and misuse monitoring. API access refers to access via ChatGPT’s API, which developers can integrate into their applications, websites, or services. enablement).
Patently-O
AUGUST 5, 2024
Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. 35 U.S.C. § In Sanho v.
IP Intelligence
JULY 19, 2024
AI Patentability and Inventorship: Practitioners also face the prospect of having an AI drafting program add details, such as embodiments or other features, to an application draft that could be part of a claim or later become part of a claim. Therefore, while AI tools can be used to assist with forms (e.g.,
The IPKat
DECEMBER 22, 2023
Another source of confusion is the divergent approaches of the UK courts and the EPO with respect to the test for the evidence standard in sufficiency and inventive step analysis. Readers looking for some clarity on G 2/21 may wish to skip straight to the recent referring Board's interpretation of G 2/21 in T 0116/18. Food for thought.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
54 
Let's personalize your content