Remove Invention Remove IP Remove Patent Law Remove Patent Troll
article thumbnail

[GuestPost] Opinion: Patent trolling threatens the market of taxi aggregators in Kazakhstan

The IPKat

Violation of the exclusive right of the patentee includes any unauthorised method of introducing into civil circulation a product made using a patented utility model. Analysing this decision, first of all, the question arises as to how it was possible to register this patent? Why is this question salient?

article thumbnail

AI and IP Law: Podcast with Yuri Eliezer

LexBlog IP

AI and IP Law: Podcast with Yuri Eliezer by Yuri L. Eliezer AI and Intellectual Property Law An Insightful Discussion with Yuri Eliezer The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intellectual Property (IP) Law is becoming increasingly significant in the dynamic landscape of technology and innovation.

Law 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Osgoode mooters recognized for their oral and written advocacy at the Harold G. Fox Intellectual Property Moot

IPilogue

The appeal raised issues about (i) whether the specific claim in the patent protecting the invention at issue was invalid due to overbreadth, and (ii) whether the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief if the patent was held to be valid. 57 of the Patent Act is the usual remedy that upholds the bargain theory of patent law.

article thumbnail

USPTO call for comments: Impact of AI on patentability

The IPKat

The international standards for patentability require that an invention is novel and inventive in view of the prior art. This approach could be used as a strategy by patent trolls or those looking to block others from patenting new structures. The full call for views can be viewed here.

Patent 60