Invention Inventor Patent Drafting Reference 
JD Supra Law
JULY 13, 2022
Inventor's technical disclosure is very important as it serves as the basis for the patent attorney's communication with the inventor. Technical Background The technical background allows the attorney to know the present invention's background and. Now let's discuss each one in turn. Now let's discuss each one in turn.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2023
This jolly invention lights up each branch individually, featuring a central bus wire nestled near the trunk, branching into 5 to 10 light circuits, each sporting 10 to 20 bulbs. 7,784,961 Before sledding into the patent’s technicalities, the inventor of this Christmas cheer utilized a lesser-known path under U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 11, 2023
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s sided with the patentee, holding that a key prior art reference was not analogous art. This case also raises questions about the value of explicitly stating the problem solved within the patent document, and perhaps directly in the patent claims. 22-1138, — F.4th
Intepat
JANUARY 21, 2023
An invention becomes patentable when it is novel, has an inventive step or is non-obvious. In order to determine whether a particular invention satisfies these preconditions set forth under the Patents Act 1970, it is imperative that an applicant carries out a thorough patent search.
TraskBritt Intellectual Property
JUNE 10, 2021
An applicant secures a patent after successfully prosecuting the patent application at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). When the USPTO believes an application embodies an invention worthy of a patent, the USPTO grants a Notice of Allowance. Patentability Search. COVID Update.
Patently-O
MARCH 13, 2024
8,671,132 (‘132 patent) unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over combinations of prior art references. The key issue on appeal was whether the Gelb reference qualified as analogous art for the purposes of the obviousness analysis. Daedalus Blue LLC v. Vidal , No. 2023-1313, slip op. In re Bigio , 381 F.3d 3d 1320 (Fed.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MARCH 6, 2024
This means that an invention should not be anticipated by documents, products, or publications in the country or elsewhere before the priority or filling date of the patent application, whichever is earlier. Prior art search determines the merits of patent applications. It is not necessary for all the technologies to be novel.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content