This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The proliferation of deepfake technology has posed significant challenges to the protection of individual identity and reputation and the recent incidents of INDIA TV and Medanta hospitals trademark infringement and deepfaked potrayals have once again re-surfaced this issue.
Almost every facet of the sports industry is now being tapped into and marketed and IntellectualProperty are valuable assets for these marketing tactics. Intellectualproperty is the asset that assists this commercialisation. Intellectualproperty, inherently, can be sold, licensed or marketed.
This article delves into these aspects in detail, exploring the nuanced intersections of data privacy and intellectualproperty within AI. Data Privacy The recent uproar for some stringent data privacy laws stems from the frequent leaks and breaches of individuals’ personal data and the risk of its misuse. Rajagopal v.
The development of Artificial Intelligence, from being able to create edited photos to now generating deepfake videos that cannot be distinguished from real videos, has created an imminent threat to intellectualpropertyrights and personalityrights specifically. Image Sources: Shutterstock] In D.M.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personalityrights, Govt. Part II: The Right to Publicity: 31 Years Since Madow’s Scathing Verdict, Yet……. Part III: The Right to Publicity: 31 Years Since Madow’s Scathing Verdict, Yet……. The Show Must Go On?
Introduction The rights which are granted to the people for their creative work are known as intellectualpropertyrights. They provide the creator a sole, time-limited right to make use of their invention. With this, trademark holders may now defend their logos on the web as well. Paramasivam & Ors. [i]
However, this article will discuss the reasoning of the court with respect to relief claimed by the Plaintiff against a creator of a YouTube video who compiled the interviews of the plaintiff and depicted his personality as ‘thug life’ The plaintiff contended that such videos portrayed him in a derogatory manner. million views.
Introduction Personalityrights refer to a person’s ability to safeguard his or her identity in the context of a property or privacy right. Celebrities value these rights since their names, images, or even voices may be inappropriately used in commercials by various businesses to increase sales.
AI, a simulation of human intelligence by a computer system designed to perform tasks typically done by human beings, has in just a few short years evolved beyond what was previously believed possible, and has manifested itself in even creating new works of IntellectualProperty, such as art, literature, music, etc.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping IntellectualPropertyrights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). The analysis is offered from the US, the UK, and the EU perspectives.
Announcing the Winners of the 2024 Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition on IntellectualProperty Law! PART I] PersonalityRights in Spotlight Once More!: India Pride Advisory Order Can a movie carrying the name of a personality be restrained from release citing infringement of personalityrights?
“Overlapping IntellectualPropertyRights 2nd Edition” edited by Neil Wilkof, Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (Oxford University Press, 2023). The book structure can be divided into four parts, with the first three analysing the overlap of patents, copyright, and trademarks, with other IP rights, respectively.
Recently, Bollywood Director Karan Johar [1] filed a case against the makers of “Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar” for using his name in the title of their movie without permission, this lawsuit has sparked again the debate relating to personalityrights in India. Topps Chewing Gum Inc. [2] Rajagopal v.
Tattoos are not just body art; they are unique expressions of personal identity. But have you ever considered the intellectualproperty aspects surrounding tattoos? TRADEMARKS AND TATTOOS Tattoos can also intersect with trademark law. Personal use, parody, and incidental inclusion are common defenses.
This book review of IntellectualProperty Law in Nigeria: Emerging Trends, Theories And Practice by Desmond Oriakhogba (University of the Western Cape, South Africa) and Ifeoluwa Olubiyi (Afe Babaloloa University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria) is kindly provided by Kasim Waziri , Professor of Law at the University of Abuja, Nigeria.
In response to these threats, many popular personalities have started trademarking their names to protect their goodwill and reputation from being misused by technology. To be honest, under the current system, the scope of protection is limited. Once uploaded, there is no reversing it.
Every day we come across many such influencers and celebrities endorsing products wherein the personality of an individual is traded either by validation or without. Living in an era where influential personalities are reverenced, fortifying PersonalityRights from any such misuse is a must. PERSONALITYRIGHT.
Therefore, the need to safeguard one’s name becomes apparent, and IntellectualPropertyRights offer a means to address this concern. However, the prevalence of unauthorized use of renowned person names in advertisements has become a concern.
With a passion for the dynamic intersection of law, media and technology, she is particularly interested in exploring intellectualproperty and tech policy. The PersonalityRights Conundrum The issue of personalityrights, however, leads us to a slightly trickier terrain.
We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. The case clarifies that the bar on arbitrability of trademark disputes is not an absolute one. Golden Tobacco Ltd [Delhi High Court]. Jorawer Singh Mundy v.
Behind that success was a masterclass in intellectualproperty. Foreman turned his name into a powerful brand, protected by an extensive network of trademarks and licensing agreements. Foremans earnings from the endorsementreportedly over $200 millionfar exceeded his total boxing purses.
Case Summaries Astellas Pharma Inc vs Astellaz Pharmaceuticals on 3 February, 2025 (Delhi High Court) The suit was filed seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from infringing its trademark. Tejaswini Kaushal discusses Section 107A and its expansive scope in the background of this case!
Explaining why and how such seemingly innocuous posts infringe on the shooter’s personalityrights, we are pleased to bring to our readers this post by SpicyIP intern Tejas Misra. PersonalityRights: Publicity or Privacy? It can include their face, voice, characteristics and distinctive qualities or attributes.
Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava. Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava.
In a guest post , Satchit Bhogle covered the issue of infringement of personalityrights. It is noted that the test for identifying infringement of personalityrights is to check whether there has been unauthorised use of identity for commercial gain and if there is a likelihood of confusion.
The article endorses an intellectualproperty approach to understand the right and its infringement. This is achieved by understanding the parallels between publicity right and trademark law. This is achieved by understanding the parallels between publicity right and trademark law.
These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectualproperty laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws. Going Forward.
Taking a Look at Lupin’s Colour TM Application for its Inhalers Image from here On Lupin’s recent colour trademark registrations for its inhalers, Md Sabeeh Ahmad. Sabeeh highlights how these registration can extend Lupin’s monopoly and could affect million’s right to access these essential medicines. C2Sense, Inc v.
She highlights that the Court refused to afford post mortem protection to personalityrights of the actor. Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personalityrights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights.
Fantasy Sports and Trademarks. One of the most glaring problems that trademark owners of high-profile sporting leagues and sports teams face today is the piracy of their trademarks. In addition to trademarks, the players are entitled to certain rights which are covered under the arena of ‘publicity rights’.
Due to the extent of unlawful activity associated with the petitioner’s name and personality, the court granted a restraining order on 25 th November 2022 against various people and companies. What are Publicity Rights? However, Indian law has indirect references for the protection of publicity rights. Under this Act, Sec.
[i] In principle, the Delhi High Court has recognized publicity rights in the case of ICC Development (International) Ltd v Arvee Enterprises (2003). [ii] ii] It was the first given judgment dealing with publicity rights. Publicity rights have attracted considerable recognition in the field of intellectualpropertyrights.
Among the many grounds was the court’s refusal to afford post mortem protection to personalityrights of the actor. I shall specifically be dealing with the contention around publicity rights. Thereby the court is acknowledging the enigmatic nature of this right- as both property and moral right.
We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The Court delineated instances like parody and satire where free speech in the context of well-known persons may be protected. Bolt Technology v. First, in Toyota v.
Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 IntellectualProperty Law & Technology Intensive Program. The etymology of the word may make sense, but can the same image be copied over and over without intellectualproperty repercussions? Shayna Jan is a 3L J.D. According to s.3(1)
In the contemporary era, AI plays a significant role in IntellectualPropertyRights, becoming increasingly integral during a period where numerous tasks are executed by artificial intelligence. Consequently, it is imperative to recognize that the use of AI itself has become a component of IntellectualProperty.
It’s now wait-and-see how it pans out… In February , Namibian Business and IntellectualProperty Authority (BIPA) advised that they are in the process of finalizing a new legal framework for copyright protection in Namibia, which would see the repeal of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act 6 of 1994.
Unfortunately, in India, there is no specific legislation which protects the intellectualpropertyrights of celebrities. We have come across many instances where Indian celebrities have registered their names and/or their signatures as a trademark. PersonalityRights. Music vector created by macrovector.
Other Posts Free Certificate Course in Application of IntellectualPropertyRights for Startups and Entrepreneurship [November 22- 23] Free Certificate Course in Application of IntellectualPropertyRights for Startups and Entrepreneurship on November 22 and 23.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the Law Commission’s Report on Trade Secrets and Economic Espionage, DHC’s decisions on working examples, writ jurisdiction of the pre-grant oppositions, and the Viagra-Vigoura trademark dispute. This and much more in last week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review.
ABSTRACT There has been a dramatic increase in the commercial use of celebrity personalities by people not authorized to do so compared to the earlier times. Protecting personalityrights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. Interesting right? Puttaswamy v.
Codible Ventures LLP and Others , the Bombay High Court addressed a legal dispute of infringement of personalityrights through the use of AI. The suit also involved a claim for the violation of his moral rights under Section 38B of the Copyright Act, 1957. In a recent judgment in the case of Arijit Singh v.
Regarding personalityrights and introducing a public interest test before granting protection to celebrities, Rebecca Cardoso, in this guest post, advocates for a balanced approach prioritizing protection against genuine harm instead of trivial grievances. Navigating PersonalityRights Does Fame Have a Trade-Off?
In the third part of his three part post on personalityrights, Akshat discusses the real implications of granting broad personalityrights to celebrities. Part I and II of this post can be accessed here and here. Akshat is a practicing litigator working at Saikrishna and Associates.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content