This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The recent surge of accessible generative AI (“GenAI”) tools has kept attorneys, particularly those in the intellectualproperty, technology, data privacy, and cybersecurity spaces, on their toes. Within the intellectualproperty community, there have been ongoing discussions, incremental resolutions, and evolving opinions.
However, as technology evolves, safeguarding intellectualproperty (IP) has become increasingly challenging. With new state privacy legislation, such as the Delete Act, to protect the sale of personal data, along with artificial intelligence legislation orchestrated by the FTC and new laws protecting.
While AI-generated prompts streamline our daily lives, they also pose significant privacy risks. Challenges emerge when AI systems not only retain data but also process and potentially share it with third parties without consent, placing data privacy at the forefront of AI governance.
As nonprofit executives, you may be wondering how AI intersects with intellectualproperty and data privacylaw, and how it could affect your organization. To be sure, AI provides a powerful tool to nonprofits in creating content and exploiting for countless cost-effective purposes. By: Farella Braun + Martel LLP
This does, however, raise substantial issues to do with the protection of IntellectualProperty (IP) and data protection. DATA PRIVACY AND INTELLECTUALPROPERTY RISKS IN THE AI ERA AI is intrinsically driven by data which is why it is crucial to understand AI in relation to data, as AI is causing ripples and revolutionizing industries.
Celebrities have objected to this because it interferes with their personal lives and their right to privacy. These agreements include the following: ● Artist agreement – When an artist does business with a company, an agreement is made between the parties because art is inherently subject to many IntellectualProperty issues.
million) but according to digital rights group La Quadrature du Net, Hadopi’s “mass internet surveillance” destroyed citizens’ fundamental right to privacy. Under EU law, member states may not pass national laws that allow for the general and indiscriminate retention of citizens’ traffic and location data.
for his leadership in intellectualproperty as “a scholar and mentor”. . Vaver’s influence on intellectualpropertylaw, is an original piece of artwork created by Toronto-based artist,? Bonnie has been a valued member of various intellectualproperty programs throughout her time at Osgoode.
AI, a simulation of human intelligence by a computer system designed to perform tasks typically done by human beings, has in just a few short years evolved beyond what was previously believed possible, and has manifested itself in even creating new works of IntellectualProperty, such as art, literature, music, etc.
1] And since, the creator, consumer and subject of the content are distinctly different-the potential lack of empathy or misapprehension by the consumers towards the subject, based on the creators potrayal, necessitate a discussion of the subjects privacy and personality rights.
One such legal issues is what is referred to as “fair use,” which becomes particularly problematic in the context of the copyright law. Thus, fundamental questions arise, such as whether such copying amounts to infringement under copyright law or whether it falls under the purview of fair use.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping IntellectualProperty rights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). Sundara Rajan devotes Chapter 11 to the overlap between moral and economic rights of authors.
The conflict between the legal regimes of trade secret law and data privacylaw is growing as companies increasingly collect and use data about their customers, making it key for organizations to find ways to comply with both laws in order to protect their intellectualproperty and the privacy of their customer, says Jenny Colgate at Rothwell Figg. (..)
“Overlapping IntellectualProperty Rights 2nd Edition” edited by Neil Wilkof, Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (Oxford University Press, 2023). Many of these hypothetical-fact situations are actual case laws. Here the author points out an interesting anomaly while discussing the US laws.
Founded in 1984, the IntellectualProperty Journal (IPJ) covers matters relating to all aspects of IntellectualProperty such as patents, trademarks, copyright, designs, trade secrets, and related areas such as privacy. Professor D’Agostino invites Osgoode law students to apply for the student editor positions.
Founded in 1984, the IntellectualProperty Journal (IPJ) covers matters relating to all aspects of IntellectualProperty such as patents, trademarks, copyright, designs, trade secrets, and related areas such as privacy. Professor D’Agostino invites Osgoode law students to apply for the student editor positions.
that the Communications Decency Act’s (CDA) exception for intellectualproperty claims does not apply to claims asserted under New York Civil Rights Law (NYCRL) Sections 50 and 51 for violations of the right to privacy or publicity. The Southern District of New York has held, in Ratermann v. Pierre Fabre USA, Inc.,
Kilpatrick Townsend’s Michael Pavento, Stephen Dew, and Tony Glosson, recently spoke on a panel at the firm’s annual Kilpatrick Townsend IntellectualProperty Seminar (KTIPS) on the topic of “Coexisting: Synergies and Tensions Among Open Source Software, Privacy, and Patents.”
The recent Hollywood strikes have brought to light significant challenges at the intersection of artificial intelligence, intellectualproperty rights, and personal agency. By: Brooks Kushman P.C.
Privacy by Design is the integration of data processing procedures to every stage of business practices. In this article we will explore the different guidelines that govern the world of Privacy by Design: The European guidelines that hold the standard, and how Privacy by Design works in Colombia. European guidelines.
This literature will delve into the issues that surround the sensitive issue of how companies maintain privacy while also trying to foster innovation. While the security of personal data is the main focus of data privacy, intellectualproperty also includes innovations like inventions, literary and creative works, and trademarks.
This is a review of Guidebook to IntellectualProperty (seventh edition) authored by Sir Robin Jacob (8 New Square and UCL, Matthew Fisher (UCL) and Lynne Chave (UCL). Kat approved This book is aimed at those who are new to the subject of intellectualproperty.
In this episode of Public Pensions & Investments Briefings, Thomas Dover and Ashley Dunning discuss the protections public pension plans can put in place today to ensure these kinds of data privacy attacks are kept at bay. They also discuss other intellectualproperty issues every public pension plan. By: Nossaman LLP
IP Osgoode would like to congratulate the winners of the Gowling WLG Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize for 2020-2021. This award is a chance to recognize Osgoode students’ research and writing in a specialized and technical field and further encourage them to develop their strong interest in IntellectualPropertyLaw.
Sally Yoon is an IPilogue Writer and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. This article was originally published on the OBA’s Information Technology and IntellectualPropertyLaw Section’s articles page. Imtiaz Karamat is an IP Osgoode Alumnus and an Associate at Deeth Williams Wall LLP.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Chapter 15: Privacy. We reworked the privacy chapter, mostly to pare it down because the topic has mushroomed to the point where it’s not possible to summarize all of the details.
In her letter to the ranking members of the Senate Subcommittee on IntellectualProperty and the House Subcommittee on Courts, IntellectualProperty, and the Internet, Director Perlmutter indicated that although substantial progress had been made, the Office will not publish part two.
These different facets include securities, corporate and commercial, taxation, antitrust, foreign investment review, international trade, intellectualproperty, employment and labour, privacy, technology and communications, and franchising. Understanding their differences is crucial for ensuring.
If you are looking for some last-minute Christmas gifts, we have some ideas for you: Call for papers The Indian Journal of IntellectualPropertyLaw, a student-run journal of NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, calls for papers for its 15th volume. The submission deadline is 31 March 2025. Well, you are in luck.
Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize for 2021-2022. Gowling WLG Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize? Gowling WLG Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize? IntellectualProperty class in the Fall 2007 term and has been generously sponsored each year since then by? Professor Pina D’Agostino ’s?Intellectual
IntellectualProperty - Generative AI – ongoing impacts - Since 2022, the popularity and availability of generative AI has continued to grow. It is estimated that 79% of internet users aged 13-17, and 31% of those aged 16 and above, use generative AI tools and services. By: Mayer Brown
Artificial intelligence raises various novel legal questions about data privacy, bias in outputs, cybersecurity, and ethics, among other topics. In 2023, however, intellectualproperty concerns associated with artificial intelligence took center stage.
recent circular on procurement of drugs, non-obviousness test under the patents law, and the Hamburg Regional Court’s decision in Robert Kneschke v LAION e.V. In part one of the post he addresses concerns about economic gains and privacy. Read her analysis on the evolving intersection of copyright law and AI!
2: HC Directs Telegram to Disclose Details of Channels Violating Copyright Law. According to the court, Telegram cannot use the defense of free speech and/or the right of privacy to protect the alleged infringers. They are seeking punitive damages and injunction barring further work on Live PD.
But have you ever considered the intellectualproperty aspects surrounding tattoos? THE ART OF TATTOOING AND COPYRIGHT Tattoos are protected by copyright laws as original works of art. TRADEMARKS AND TATTOOS Tattoos can also intersect with trademark law. Personal use, parody, and incidental inclusion are common defenses.
On June 28, a group of 16 individuals filed a class action complaint in the Northern District of California against generative artificial intelligence (GAI) developer OpenAI on several alleged violations of federal and state law on privacy, unfair business practices and computer fraud.
Stay tuned for expert insights regarding the impact of AI on intellectualproperty, licensing, contracts, regulatory policy, enforcement, privacy, and venture markets in life sciences. In this blog series, we explore how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing research, innovation, and patient care in the life sciences.
The Third Circuit ruled today that Section 230 doesn’t preempt publicity rights claims because they qualify as “intellectualproperty” claims. With respect to statutory analysis, the majority says “when Congress wanted to cabin the interpretation about state law, it knew how to do so—and did so explicitly.”
This post focuses only on the New York publicity rights claims (NY Civil Rights Law 50 & 51) against Amazon Walmart, and Ulta. The court says: “New York courts have long construed Sections 50 and 51 to provide a statutory right to privacy , not property… New York does not recognize the common law right of publicity.
The winner will be receiving a prize of $1,000 and, in addition to having their winning articles showcased here on the IPilogue, the articles will be considered for publication in the Canadian IntellectualProperty Review (CIPR) or the IntellectualProperty Journal (IPJ). Professor Ikechi Mgbeoji. Bereskin, QC.
As digital spaces grow in popularity, so do the stakes around intellectualproperty, particularly copyright. For instance, virtual concerts in the metaverse, where avatars perform popular songs, may violate music copyright laws unless proper licensing agreements are in place.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. If You Are Teaching (Or Want to Teach) Advertising Law For reasons why you should consider teaching an advertising law course, see this post. Price: $12 * Kindle.
By: Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider Film director Gareth Edwards attempted to do just that in his new movie, The Creator, about artificial intelligence. Edwards used an AI algorithm to attempt to replicate the musical style of composer Hans Zimmer.
4) Robustness, safety, reliability, and data privacy of AI models. Robustness, safety, reliability, data privacy, are just some of the most noticeable pain points in training and deploying AI systems. customer data), directly using such training data may result in serious data privacy breaches.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content