This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In the case of the ownership of intellectualproperty (IP) developed by a supplier as part of a service agreement with a customer, should the traditional position that the customer should own all developed IP always be the position agreed upon by the parties? By: Morgan Lewis - Tech & Sourcing
The dramatic rise in e-commerce in the last two decades saw many brand and business owners struggling to safeguard their IntellectualProperty (IP) assets in cyberspace, starting from domain names and then going onto social media handles. IP Challenges in the Metaverse. A Comprehensive Approach to IPRs.
A highly creative and successful writer, producer and performer, Prince was also a savvy IP strategist, who sought to control his work, name and image. He also railed against his record company, which sought to assert ownership rights over his catalogue and name.
Instead, it is they may not own the exclusive rights to the IntellectualProperty (IP) assets that such technologies are built upon usually. So, let us now make ourselves aware of the different challenges manufacturing firms face around IP in the digital economy and ways of overcoming them.
Intellectualproperty rights may be established, protected, or granted to another party by contracts or agreements. In today’s business landscape, the significance of intellectualproperty (IP) assets is on the rise and is becoming increasingly crucial in various sectors.
This is a book review of Teaching IntellectualProperty Law: Strategy and Management edited by Sabine Jacques, Associate Professor in Information Technology, Media and IntellectualProperty Law, University of East Anglia Law School and Ruth Soetendorp, Visiting Academic, City University of London and Professor Emerita, Bournemouth University.
While facilitating technology transfer, it is significant to look at how IP rights play a role. IntellectualProperty Rights Protection IP licensing is an essential element of technology transfer. When a technology must be transferred, the owner’s IP rights are licensed through an agreement between the parties.
The IPKat is pleased to host the following contribution by Katfriend Marianna Ryan (Edwin Coe and King's College London) on the topical issue of how Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) are to be treated and what IP issues come with them. Here's what Marianna writes: Ownership of IP rights by DAOs – the future is nigh?
There are, however, several challenges related to obtaining IP protection for algorithms in China. Lack of IP protection may expose the development to theft, infringement and misuse by Chinese competitors and it may result in huge economic losses for the developers. But rights holders must be prepared.
For creators who seek to protect their intellectualproperty (IP), the idea of enforcing intellectualproperty rights in the metaverse may initially appear to be daunting.
This is a review of Research Handbook on IntellectualProperty and Cultural Heritage , edited by Irini Stamatoudi , Professor of IntellectualProperty Law and Cultural Heritage Law at the University of Nicosia. Sinanidou is titled States’ Discretion to Classify IP Subject Matter as National Cultural Treasures.
The Future of IPR in AI: Over time, AI technology evolves, and so does the legal requirement for ways to regulate intellectualproperty. New Categories of IP Protection: Perhaps the development of specific rules governing IPRs of AI-generated content can help to shed light on ownership and cases of infringement.
If the parties decide to work together, they will most likely enter into a services agreement outlining their respective rights and obligations, including intellectualproperty (IP) ownership and commercialization rights. By: Morgan Lewis - Tech & Sourcing
Emily Xiang is an IPilogue Writer, a Senior Fellow with the IP Innovation Clinic, and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where she teaches contracts, international IP, patents, copyright, and courses on Biblical Law. Professor Ruth L. Okediji is the Jeremiah Smith Jr.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and IntellectualProperty on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). While the Report is comprehensive, it does not recommend any new action to address IP issues with NFTs.
During a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s IP Subcommittee today, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) were the only senators present to question the Pride in Patent Ownership Act’s (PPOA’s) approach to penalizing patent owners who fail to record accurate ownership information within 90 days after the issuance date.
the ownership disputes in India and the U.K. The status quo of intellectualproperty rights of the employees working under an employer ahead of them is a sinking ship surrounded by Pirates. This is quite the picture of how the Indian copyright laws are treating the employees who try to become such exceptional creators.
2774, the Pride in Patent Ownership Act, co-sponsored by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), a number of patent advocacy organizations have sent a joint letter to the committee asking it to oppose the bill.
Copyright Office published a joint notice of inquiry in the Federal Register announcing that the two agencies would be collaborating on a study regarding intellectualproperty legal issues related to digital assets known as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
The Pride in Patent Ownership Act, S.2774, Attaching the Pride in Patent Ownership Act to the NDAA means it will certainly become law. Attaching the Pride in Patent Ownership Act to the NDAA means it will certainly become law. 2774, is currently being attached to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
Big data is a relatively new concept that has created a greater conundrum in the realm of IntellectualProperty (IP) laws. Where does IP come from in the Said Scenario? ” Therefore, the domain of big data cannot escape the interplay of IP laws in its administration and protection against third parties.
The two parties agreed that Palmer shall keep the artworks he identified, but they could not settle on the issue of copyright ownership. He argued that “ copyright in the paintings created during the relationship is relationship property and should be divided equally between the parties. ”.
Where else would intellectualproperty be used in a screenplay or a film is the next issue. Sincere to say, intellectualproperty rights are involved in every phase of the film. However, to a lesser extent, other IP laws like the Trademark Act and the Designs Act will also be important. Who Owns What and Why.
The rise of generative AI has created copyright and ownership challenges in creative industries, but contractual agreements, intellectualproperty law and AI-specific regulations can be used to address these issues, says Kimiya Shams at Devialet.
Tokenization refers to the process of creating digital tokens that represent ownership of an asset. The assets can be physical or digital, and tokenization allows for fractional ownership of assets, making it easier for investors to buy and sell them. Investors can buy and sell the tokens, providing liquidity for the IP asset.
patent recipients and active patent family owners, providing the IP world with a look at the patent ownership landscape that developed throughout the course of 2021. Today, patent data analytics firm IFI CLAIMS released its annual report of the top U.S.
We’re pleased to inform you that Centre for IntellectualProperty Studies, National Law University, Jodhpur is is inviting submissions from law students for the ‘NLUJ CIPS Inter College IP Research Essay Writing Competition, 2022’ on the theme ‘“IP and Youth: Innovating for a better future’. Third Prize: Rs.
If you own IP in Colombia or abroad and are seeking financing and cash for your projects or company, this article is for you. Intellectualproperty (IP) is an increasingly important asset for businesses in today’s knowledge-based economy. This is where IP finance comes in.
Oriakhogba’s work is a timely reflection on approaches to navigate the complex terrain of using copyright laws to address issues of ownership, control and management inherent in or arising from repatriated (and/or "should-be-repatriated") cultural heritage materials. See South Africa's IntellectualProperty Laws Amendment Act.
If you own IP in Colombia or abroad and are seeking financing and cash for your projects or company, this article is for you. Intellectualproperty (IP) is an increasingly important asset for businesses in today’s knowledge-based economy. This is where IP finance comes in.
This sentiment plays into inherent feelings of propertyownership and control over your property —in this case, your intellectualproperty (“IP”. But what are the legal underpinnings that tie Halsey’s (and other artists’) ownership and control of their music?
Last September, a bipartisan pair of Senators introduced the Pride in Patent Ownership Act, which, if passed, would add greatly-needed transparency to our patent system. The legislation would require patent owners to disclose their identity to the U.S.
District Judge James Selna granted a motion for sanctions after finding that ConsumerDirect fraudulently represented its ownership of unregistered trademarks while obtaining a preliminary injunction in U.S. On November 8, a Central California jury entered a verdict awarding $3.9 The verdict comes weeks after U.S.
This book review of IntellectualProperty Law in Nigeria: Emerging Trends, Theories And Practice by Desmond Oriakhogba (University of the Western Cape, South Africa) and Ifeoluwa Olubiyi (Afe Babaloloa University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria) is kindly provided by Kasim Waziri , Professor of Law at the University of Abuja, Nigeria.
One notable example is Meta’s (formerly known as Facebook) ownership of a wearable magnet technology that can track a user’s body poses when worn around the torso. In the face of increased patent litigation, IP lawyers and lawmakers interacting with the AR/VR patent landscape should consider 2 potential problems.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and its ability to generate content closely resembling human output present issues with respect to IPownership. Maybe you have asked ChatGPT to create a flashy advertisement or write some code to support software development. By: Benesch
Any form of IntellectualProperty (IP) , be it a trademark, patent, or copyright, can be licensed to third parties. Through IP licensing, IP rights holders grant third parties the exclusive right to use their IP while retaining their ownership. Understanding the IP License.
But have you ever considered the intellectualproperty aspects surrounding tattoos? COMMISSIONED TATTOOS AND OWNERSHIP When commissioning a tattoo, clients pay for the service, not the copyright. EXCLUSIONS AND DEFENSES TO IP INFRINGEMENT Several defenses exist for IP infringement in tattoos.
According to Duff and Phelps, and CII’s joint report in 2019 on IP-backed financing, the proportion of tangible assets in the market value of Standard and Poor’s 500 firms has declined from over 80 percent to under 20 percent in the past three decades, thus signifying the rising contribution of intangible assets.
India embraces an increasingly changing workforce amid tremendous technological progress and new models of work so the convergence of intellectualproperty rights and employee innovation has become the reason of legal debate. 2] Employees increasingly use personal devices and software while performing the task assigned to them.
Introduction IntellectualProperty Rights are intangible rights All rights related to the property are exclusively reserved with the copyright holder. It serves the purpose of having IntellectualProperty Rights in existence that is to give legal rights for the protection of the invention and creation.
Introduction Before hunting into the intricacies of IntellectualProperty Rights (IPR) in the metaverse, it is essential to know what the metaverse entails. In the metaverse and physical world, the notion of IntellectualProperty Rights (IPR) has a murky image.
“Web3 cannot and should not be reduced to blockchain when the real shift is towards user ownership of digital assets… This definitional shift focuses attention on what assets can be legally owned and the meaning of ownership “rights,” more generally, in the emerging digital spaces of web3.”. . user ownership of digital assets)?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content