This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
David Vaver is the Acting Director of IP Osgoode and a Professor of IntellectualPropertyLaw at Osgoode Hall Law School. The following is a preview of a paper to be published in the IntellectualProperty Journal. . Part I of the Act deals with the ownership of copyright in works. Section 34.1(1)
The term “trade dress” refers to the overall look of a product or its packaging that gives the customer an idea of its origin. Non-verbal elements such as shapes, colours, patterns, and even the layout of the store are protected under trade dress, whereas standard trademarks normally refer to words or logos [3].
“Web3 cannot and should not be reduced to blockchain when the real shift is towards user ownership of digital assets… This definitional shift focuses attention on what assets can be legally owned and the meaning of ownership “rights,” more generally, in the emerging digital spaces of web3.”. . user ownership of digital assets)?
Background In response to an infringement case filed by Provisur, Weber filed two inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions to invalidate two patents owned by Provisur, based on Weber’s operating manuals and additional references, which the Board instituted. Weber , slip op., The two patents (U.S. Patent Nos. Weber , slip op., Weber , slip op.,
One of the main areas of intellectualpropertylaw development is the link between artificial intelligence and intellectualproperty rights (IPRs). Growing AI-related business activity, early case law, and legislative and international policy activities are making it more and more relevant in practice.
In addition, concerns have been raised regarding the authenticity and possession of the artwork, the involvement of the artist, and the authorship and ownership of its copyright in relation to the integration of artificial intelligence into the artistic process. Hence, generating copyright ownership opportunities for human contributors.
On March 18, 2017, Kat Von D posted an image on her personal Instagram of herself using the Davis image as a reference while inking the tattoo. In comparison, previous copyright infringement cases over tattoo art focus on an existing tattoo being reproduced in another work rather than the copying of a reference image. Further Reading.
The applicant, Malvern, unsuccessfully traversed the rejection on the merits, but removed the ’175 patent from prior art consideration by arguing that § 103(c)(1) applied, due to common ownership. After a change in ownership, Malvern sought supplemental examination of the ’175 patent under 35 U.S.C. § Cytogen, Inc. , 3d at 1167).
Interestingly, the court also distinguished between ownership and inventorship , emphasizing that only humans can be capable of ownership, but inventorship only requires the capacity to invent, which AI arguably possesses. Patent Law in Canada. When defining this term, experts refer to Apotex Inc. 2002 SCC 77 (“Apotex”).
This would make it socially responsible to introduce technological break-throughs into services for the benefit of society, protecting intellectualproperty on one hand but allowing different voices that will shape the metaverse on the other, stipulating guidelines on data ownership and requiring consent by users.
To put it straightforwardly, the Metaverse refers to an immersive digital space in which users interact with different people and things by using digital avatars. NFTs may refer to the digital goods or specific pieces sold in the Metaverse. These are non-fungible, implying that they are unique and can never be replaced by something.
In this part II we discuss two additional aspects, with a focus on UK copyright law and the EU copyright acquis. The First Sale Doctrine in the Metaverse The first sale doctrine, also referred to as the ‘ principle of exhaustion’ , is a longstanding tenet of copyright (and more in general intellectualproperty) law.
In a lawsuit filed at an Illinois district court last week, the companies target attorney Michael Hierl of Illinois, and Hughes Sokol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd, a Chicago law firm of which Hierl is a shareholder. It contains the following paragraphs: Some clarifications are in order before moving on.
There are no separate legal provisions for these rights and they have been included under the existing IntellectualPropertylaws. The concept of passing-off under Trademark law can be applied if the person concerned is a well-known figure. Passing-off refers to misrepresenting someone else’s goods as one’s own.
Introduction The Intellectualpropertylaws are designed in such a way that not only reward the creator of his intellectual creation thereby incentivising other creators for further innovation, while balancing the rights of the creator with the right of the society to access information or knowledge. Atanasova, I.
Any form of IntellectualProperty (IP) , be it a trademark, patent, or copyright, can be licensed to third parties. Through IP licensing, IP rights holders grant third parties the exclusive right to use their IP while retaining their ownership.
But if we try to solve the issue of ownership and decide on who should hold the heritage that has not disappeared and that is still around, 3D digitisation is actually not that helpful, and it would be insensitive to even question if any country would give up on the repatriation requests if they were given a digital copy.
NFT creation, investment, sale, and ownership interest exists in Indonesia and elsewhere in the world. A digital asset that is held on a blockchain, such as music, art, in-game items, or films, is referred to as an NFT. Provisions of intellectualpropertylaw will be applicable to NFTs. electronic data deletion.
Blog sought to study global moves or court cases that have taken place regarding uses of copyright in made-always-with-an-AI creation and provide discussion over possible solutions to the future of intellectualpropertylaws. References U.S. Copyright Office, Compendium of Copyright Office Practices , 2023. Slater, 888 F.3d
[Image Sources: Shutterstock] Protecting such outstanding works of art and property through the use of intellectualpropertylaw is undeniably a sound strategy. Artwork based on such a notion presents challenges when attempting to establish ownership.
It thus becomes crucial for them to safeguard their creations through effective intellectualpropertylaws. Copyright is a form of intellectualpropertylaw designed to safeguard original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, and artistic works such as computer software, novels, architecture etc.
In simple terms, blockchain refers to a data structure or method that stores digital records and data in a decentralized way, implying that no central authority holds access to the operations of the said system. Blockchain technology allows for a guarded and secured chain of evidence for IP ownership. Implementing Blockchain.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that California Civil Code section 980(a)(2) , which grants “exclusive ownership” of a sound recording fixed before February 15, 1972, to its “author,” provides only an exclusive right of reproduction and distribution, and does not provide an exclusive right of public performance.
The report complements the analysis of laws with a review of practices and contractual arrangements of claiming and attributing authorship and/or ownership by actors in the field of AI music creation. The study covers practices of for-profit AI-powered online music creation services (e.g., folk-rnn , Melomics ).
Considering the complex IP landscape of the digital economy with IP ownership distributed across multiple companies, it can be tough for companies to own all the IP assets required for manufacturing intelligent devices. Licensing In & Licensing Out IP Assets As Per Needs & Opportunities. Protection of Trade Secrets.
The court has swiftly addressed the potential for disagreement over this ownership by allowing the affected party to seek clarification through a formal application. References Bali, P., & Malhotra, N. Indian Journal of IntellectualPropertyLaw, 11, 179-204. To Block or Not to Block?: link] Sareen, M.
A trademark registration certificate that you receive after getting your proposed trademark approved from a country’s Trademark Office is just the first step in the journey of your trademark ownership. The inconvenient truth in this scenario is that owning a trademark is not like owning a home; instead, it is more like renting.
Personality Rights: Every individual has the right and ownership over the use of the information related to their identity, and this right even increases when the use is commercial. are all part of their personality rights, which are protected under intellectualproperty rights. References: Shrivastava, Amisha.
Have Proper Symbols of Trademark Registration & Ownership. Referring to your trademark as a verb or noun enhances its likelihood of becoming generic and eventually losing its trademark protection someday. It has already knocked out some widely recognized brands in the past, including Cellophane, Asprin, and Escalator.
The AG held that the notion refers to the retransmission of a primary transmission by cable distributors, who carry out such retransmission as professional operators in the context of a conventional cable network. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. IntellectualPropertyLaw in China, 2nd edition. Stay tuned!
Trademark Licensing refers to the process where the owner of a trademark (the licensor) gives another person (the licensee) the right to use the trademark. His exclusive ownership of the trademark rights. What is Trademark Licensing?
Introduction IntellectualPropertyrefers to those intangible assets which are created by virtue of the human intellect. The various forms of intellectualproperty are already well known- trademarks, patents, copyrights, industrial designs, trade secrets, domain names and geographical indications.
million) knew that the NFT may or may not reference any art at all. To explain, an NFT is a unique digital token stored on a blockchain—it acts as a record of ownership of an item, like a certificate of authenticity of a cat painting. This art, however, does not immutably exist on a blockchain.
7] They argued that since they paid for these elements to be used in their movie, they had legitimate ownership of the final product. Although the ownership of a work can be transferred by assigning the copyright, the author always remains the same and is not considered when referring to the owner of the work. 106A [3] Marley C.
Basics of IP in Metaverse In simple words, IntellectualProperty Rights refer to legal rights that protect the intangible property of a person that arises from a person’s intellect. These rights are crucial for the development of innovation and intellectual creation.
Plant Variety Protection, also called Breeder’s Rights, refers to the intellectual rights given to plant breeders. As such, breeders can obtain patents, trademarks, and industrial designs that establish their ownership over legally approved new plant varieties. Laws regulating the Plant Varieties in the UAE.
Big data is a relatively new concept that has created a greater conundrum in the realm of IntellectualProperty (IP) laws. Big data refers to the large and diverse sets of information that can grow at an ever-increasing rate. What is Big Data?
The term ‘copyright’ combines two words, copy and right; therefore, we can also say that copyright refers to the legitimate and exclusive rights of the individual or entity owning the creative IntellectualProperty (IP) assets. Musical Works under the Indian Copyright Act of 1957.
Conflict and Challenges Between Outer Space Laws and IntellectualProperty The concept lies in the jurisdiction, simply quoting that Government organizations are the sole beneficiaries when it comes to the use of their Space objects in outer space. The country can apply its intellectualpropertylaw and deal with the issue.
According to the Indian Trademark Act of 1999 , trademark assignment refers to allocating a trademark in writing by the deed of the parties involved. In straightforward terms, it refers to assigning a trademark in writing by its holder or any other authorized person to another individual. Overview of Trademark Assignment.
This requires adopting these notions into systems like private law, where the existing utilitarian, economic, and owner-centered approach needs to be modified as we explain. x] It is challenging to accurately identify and follow the knowledge holders [xi] , partly because complex group ownership.
The term ‘ IntellectualProperty (IP) ‘ basically refers to the creations of the human mind that are intangible in nature. They refer to the exclusive and legal rights safeguarding the unique creations of the human intellect for a specific period. Now let us define IPRs. Understanding Mergers.
In this sector, intellectualproperty (IP) regulations are essential for defending the rights of inventors, artists, and producers. We will examine the fundamental ideas and rules of copyright, trademark, and patent laws as well as how they relate to various entertainment business sectors in this extensive book.
What are IntellectualProperty Rights (IPRs)? IntellectualProperty Rights (IPRs) refer to the legal rights granted to individuals or businesses for their creations or inventions. Firstly, intellectualproperty rights grant startups exclusive ownership over their innovative ideas and inventions.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content