This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
. • Artificial Intelligence, Design Law and Fashion, by Hasan Kadir Yılmaztekin. The Cambridge Handbook of Investment-Driven IntellectualProperty, by Enrico Bonadio and Patrick Goold. Research Handbook on IntellectualProperty and MoralRights, by Ysolde Gendreau.
This is a book review of “ Harmonizing IntellectualPropertyLaw for a Trans-Atlantic Knowledge Economy ”, edited by Péter Mezei, Hannibal Travis, and Anett Pogácsás. Karolyna Sztobryn assesses whether EU IP laws adequately consider disability perspectives, highlighting potential gaps and advocating for greater inclusivity.
According to the information published by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry, and Tourism, in 2021, China became first Asia’s inverstor in Colombia. At this moment, the concept of NFTs as property is as abstract as a patent law, or an extension of IntellectualPropertylaw, as NFTs are essentially ideas that have taken virtual form. .
xxiv] Intellectualpropertylaw recognizes a limited monopoly-esque propertyright for the creator. xxv] Bargaining between rights holders and potential users can be described as a form of bilateral monopoly meaning that the transaction costs of bargaining are extremely high. [iv] iv] Maxwell L.
The argument that producers should have ownership of the copyright because they bear the risk of making the movie is not convincing when compared to other industries such as publishing, where the publisher bears a similar risk but does not have authorship or ownership of the copyright under the law. 106A [3] Marley C.
Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.
This contribution is based on a paper published in 44 European IntellectualPropertyLaw Review 595 (2022). . As is known, originality has always been the essential requirement of copyright law, and only works that show some minimum amount of this attribute usually fall within the scope of protection.
Introduction The Intellectualpropertylaws are designed in such a way that not only reward the creator of his intellectual creation thereby incentivising other creators for further innovation, while balancing the rights of the creator with the right of the society to access information or knowledge.
We are happy to announce that going forward we will be publishing an annual review of the case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof, authored by Jan Bernd Nordemnann (NORDEMANN law firm). This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moralrights. Moralrights (Sections 12-14 UrhG).
It is not ideas but their expression that are protected by copyright law. Generally, the author of a copyright work has the right to reproduce, publish, perform, communicate and adapt his work. These different exclusive rights form the bundle of rights that we refer to as copyright.
In 2008, the Foundation published a six-volume work that illustrated in details the Foundation’s computer-based cataloguing of data related to the painter’s works. Schifano’s heirs sued again the Foundation, claiming violation of their economic and moralrights over the works. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.
student at Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur and is passionate about IntellectualPropertyLaw and Media and Entertainment Law, with a strong interest in ADR. Before this decision, Section 66A of the IT Act made it a criminal offence to publish a post which may, in essence, cause annoyance.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content