article thumbnail

Deepfakes and Personality Rights: The Need for codifying Personality Rights.

IP and Legal Filings

Deepfakes, capable of mimicking a person’s likeness and voice with near-perfect accuracy, have transcended their initial novelty to become potent tools for misinformation, deception, and exploitation. The codification of personality rights could be one way to deal with the misuse of deepfake technology.

article thumbnail

Synthetic Singers and Voice Theft: BomHC protects Arijit Singh’s Personality Rights [PART II]

SpicyIP

Codible Ventures LLP that has initiated a judicial discussion on the protection of artists’ personality rights against the unauthorised use of their voices by AI tools. This decision is likely to influence future legal standards on personality rights and the application of emerging technologies.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Your Face, is My Case: Personality Rights

LexBlog IP

Jokes aside, the title of today’s post is “Your Face, is My Case,” because we’re talking about likeness and image rights, sometimes collectively referred to as “personality rights.” Student athletes are allowed to fully control their personality rights and make money licensing them.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (October 28-November 3)

SpicyIP

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on Delhi High Court’s orders in the Pertuzumab patent dispute, order concerning personality rights of the Telugu movie star Vishnu Manchu, and Madras High Court’s decision on burden of proof in patent revocation cases.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

Personality Rights – Is it enough to protect us from AI?

Selvam & Selvam Blog

Considering the same, the Courts have started providing remedies under the scope of personality rights wherein protection is granted against the unauthorized use of names, images, voice, likeness, dialogues or traits of popular celebrities.

article thumbnail

Ferragamo did not infringe Audrey Hepburn’s image/personality rights by stating that its shoes were originally designed for her

The IPKat

In all this, it is worth recalling that, under Italian law, image/personality rights have traditionally received broad protection. In the present case, it is a fact that Ferragamo created the Audrey and Ira shoes for Hepburn, as it was equally true that Hepburn had worn Gondoletta.

article thumbnail

The Interaction of Intellectual Property with Data Privacy in the Realm of Artificial Intelligence

Intepat

The more streamlined and personalized the responses, the more data is stored in databases, which AI then draws on to create future responses. This data can range from personal to general information. Recently, the courts have also recognized the commercial right over one’s personal data as a part of intellectual property rights.