This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It submitted 14 socialmedia posts “which it contends shows consumers and retailers attributed a particular source to Defendants’ liquor and Plaintiff’s television show.” The managing director declared “[a]t the time that I chose the name Peaky Blinder, I had never heard of [Plaintiff’s] Peaky Blinders television program.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. Television , the court held that artwork shown in the background for 27 seconds in an episode of ROC was sufficiently recognizable to cross the de minimis threshold for actionable copying of protected expression. Conversely, in Ringgold v.
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
Painaway advertised its products as “Australia’s No. 1 Joint & Muscle Spray and Cream Topical Pain Relief Brand” on: (1) its Australian website; (2) socialmedia; and (3) Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) athletes’ clothing in matches televised in the United States.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
The policy excluded personal and advertising injury, including “publication, in any manner, of material that violates a person’s right of privacy,” disparagement, use of advertising ideas, and trade dress infringement, if such activities “arise out of or are part of ‘exhibitions and related marketing,’ ” which are broadly defined.
Walkowicz allegedly received multiple emails and social-media messages commenting on the similarities between Walkowicz and Luciana and inquiries about whether they had endorsed the doll. I will note here, as I often do, that in a falseadvertising case these allegations would likely be treated as conclusory at best.
Chesney also performed on the Lounge’s beachfront stage at a 2014 concert broadcast as “Kenny Chesney: Live at the Flora-Bama” on Country Music Television (CMT), a Viacom channel. An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts. It was him.
Relying extensively on the rationale of the Single Judge’s order, the Division Bench held that Section 31D specifically deals only with Radio and Television Broadcasting. SocialMedia platform Humans of Bombay filed a case against a similar platform- People of India alleging copyright infringement and replication of their business model.
26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, falseadvertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. Its an original comedic television series created by Mindy Kaling and Warner Bros.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content