Remove False Advertising Remove Marketing Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs appealed. See Zenith Elecs. Exzec, Inc. ,

article thumbnail

Examining the Circuit Split on Preliminary Injunctions in False Advertising Post-eBay

IP Watchdog

Among these ads and messages, some may be useful in building the public’s confidence and marketing effective products to consumers, but some may mislead and deceive desperate consumers into buying treatments and products without any scientific support.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

.” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. Troia claimed that he did not use the LoanStreet trademark in commerce. Just referencing a trademark on the Internet does not support a trademark claim, full stop. The court displays some of the ads: Use in Commerce.

article thumbnail

Announcing the Sixth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: False Advertising Overview. Chapter 9: False Advertising Practice and Remedies. Price: $12. Chapter 4: Deception.

Editing 126
article thumbnail

False advertising and TM infringement receive very different damages treatment: case in point

43(B)log

17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act false advertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for false advertising. Nor did significant sales growth linked to the marketing campaign at issue. Natera, Inc.,

article thumbnail

TIL: “Texas Tamale” Is an Enforceable Trademark–Texas Tamale v. CPUSA2

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] In an April 2023 summary judgment ruling , the plaintiff established that it “possesses the legally protectable, incontestable trademarks TEXAS TAMALE and TEXAS TAMALE COMPANY.” They can keep their logo trademark). ” Say what? ” Uh oh. ” UGH.

Trademark 129
article thumbnail

YouTube Defeats Trademark Lawsuit–Lops v. YouTube

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Leonel Lops claims a trademark in the term “Confidence Empire” for shoes. He sued YouTube for allegedly infringing his trademark and sought “$1 billion in damages, $2 million in costs, at least $500 million in punitive damages, and temporary and permanent injunctive relief.” ” Cites to Yout v.

Trademark 105