This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Victory operates as Brough Brothers, which claims it was the first African American owned bourbon distillery in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, with the requisite licenses to operate a distillery by September 2020. The statements at issue didnt claim to have a distillers license and permit.
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
Baden, a basketball manufacturer, argued that Molten had engaged in falseadvertising when Molten claimed that its basketballs were ‘innovative,’ ‘exclusive,’ and ‘proprietary’ when its ‘innovative’ layer of padding beneath the cover was invented by Baden, not Molten.”
ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference.
The Cube file was provided under a Creative Commons, non-commercial, no derivatives license. It advertised “This device was one of the most popular items on a popular 3D printing website with over 20,000 unique downloads” on its website, at a time when Leszczynski’s Thingiverse page displayed that his Cube had been downloaded 20,000 times.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. NAR “is the nation’s largest trade association for real estate professionals.”
The relevant defendants provided coaching services on how to apply for, manage, and rotate merchant accounts, as well as designing and implementing advertisements, and participated in a months-long onboarding process with the main defendants. Defendants argued that they merely licensed legitimate, commercial software for lawful use only.
2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s falseadvertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. It sells compounds/licenses its technology for use in sports nutrition supplements, while BPI produces its own dietary supplements.
Neo4j Enterprise Edition was originally offered under both a paid-for commercial license and the free GNU Affero General Public License, version 3, but Neo4j then replaced that AGPL with a stricter license (the Sweden license), which prohibited the non-paying public from engaging in commercial resale and certain commercial support services.
Falseadvertising: Beyond the use of the mark, Boston Suburban allegedly took customer reviews from Boston Carriage and assigned fictitious names to the customers when it copied the reviews onto the “copycat” website. But as a non-exclusive licensee, it couldn’t alone bring a claim of conversion, which requires a right of possession.
Plaintiffs allegd both direct and contributory falseadvertising, which requires (1) that the “third party in fact directly engaged in falseadvertising that injured the plaintiff” and (2) “that the defendant contributed to that conduct either by knowingly inducing, or causing the conduct, or by materially participating in it.”
pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising. Defendants challenged whether plaintiffs identified any false or misleading statements by defendants. The medical board’s license is its statement even if the doctor is the one who frames it and displays it on their wall.
The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. Citing Dastar and Rogers ; noting in a footnote that Dastar suggested that Lanham Act falseadvertising claims might sometimes govern statements about artistic provenance without raising any First Amendment concern.]
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. brewer works only with Keurig brand or licensed pods) but some did not (e.g., I prefer the taste of Keurig or Keurig-licensed brands.).
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
15, 2024) This putative class action alleged that Amazon overcharged and “[d]eceived consumers by misrepresenting that it was selling them Digital Content when, in fact, it was really only licensing it to them[.]” The court disagreed: there’s a plausible difference in value between owning outright versus purchasing a revocable license.
Unlike purchasing physical content from a store that a consumer can hold on to forever, the suit alleges that Apple’s license to the content expires and therefore the consumer’s right to own the content also expires. For one, New York’s falseadvertising law provide potential damages of $500 per instance of falseadvertising.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. De Simone then split from VSL, which eventually lost the license for the De Simone Formulation and attempted to reverse engineer it/replace it.
I]ts primary funding source is the sale and licensing of publications containing its copyrighted works.” UpCodes, Inc., 2021 WL 1236106, Nos. 6261 (VM) & 20 Civ. 4316 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. It sells I-Codes and Custom Codes through its online store, along with access to additional features through its premiumACCESS tool. “[I]ts
.” Unlike purchasing physical content from a store that a consumer can hold on to forever, the suit alleges that Apple’s license to the content expires and therefore the consumer’s right to own the content also expires. The suit could have major implications for Apple, as well as other streamers using similar terminology.
million consent judgment, which defendants touted in a press release and advertised on Zinus’s website even after the court vacated the stipulated judgment. Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute falseadvertising.
Defendants who had federal firearms licenses had access to, but did not use, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System before selling unfinished frames and receivers to New York consumers, while some defendants weren’t licensed to sell firearms at all.
Shingle Savers counterclaimed, alleging, among other things, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Lanham Act/ODTPA claims: First, the court declined to hold that Rule 9(b) applied to Lanham Act falseadvertising claims, which don’t require fraud.
15, 2021) ThermoLife got a significant success in this appeal of the dismissal of its false patent marking, falseadvertising, and unfair competition claims. And it alleged proximate cause by alleging that its nitrates directly compete with Compound’s falselyadvertised VASO6. Compound Solutions, Inc.,
It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. This also got rid of the breach of contract claim, which was based on the alleged trademark infringement and falseadvertising.
17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument. Dismissed with leave to amend.
26, 2022) [much other stuff skipped] The parties had a falseadvertising dispute that went to a jury, which found that FIGS wasn’t liable for falselyadvertising the antimicrobial properties of its scrubs. FIGS’ alleged copying of SPI’s products was not relevant to falseadvertising. 2022 WL 18399950, No.
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. The plaintiffs disavowed a claim based solely on Apple’s “safe” representation. eBay case from 2008.
They sought at least $45 million from the government of Puerto Rico for issuing a commemorative license plate for the fiftieth anniversary of Roberto Clemente’s “Hit 3000,” at $21/plate. For trademark, any request was moot since the law requiring the sale of license plates and license labels expired by its own terms on December 31, 2022.
But, modeling agreements also regularly include limited licenses regarding how (and for how long) the images will be used. 1125(a)(1) for misrepresentation of sponsorship (FalseAdvertising + False Association). In Gibson , the plaintiffs have sued under both the Lanham Act and N.C.
Fresh Bourbon allegedly falselyadvertises that Fresh Bourbon is the “first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky,” and makes other related false claims, which is allegedly false because it’s not a distillery, which requires both federal (TTB) and Kentucky (KABC) licenses.
On 24 June 2022, BAYC sued Ryder Ripps, a conceptual artist and NFT creator for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, falseadvertising, cybersquatting and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. This is a U.S
Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. The complaint didn’t allege how his position in the marketplace was harmed in any way; he even alleged that he “does not license his photos for any commercial purpose, does not sell copies of his photos, and his photos are unpublished.”
12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary falseadvertising analysis.
The defendant was initially given “complete and exclusive licensing rights in and to [the selected mares] and all cloned foals.” The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and falseadvertising.
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. Creager never attempted to license the images or otherwise value them, other than to testify that no amount of money would justify licensing to a competitor for this type of ad.
Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.
8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for falseadvertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falselyadvertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding. 2023 WL 7390842, No.
However, Von Berg allegedly sold Nutra-Luxe to Lash HoldCo, LLC without notice or compensation to Hawrych without paying him, at which point Hawrych revoked permissions and licenses that he had granted Defendants for the use of his name, image, and trademark. Thus, the falseadvertising claim would be dismissed.
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. This opinion tacks on more ideas: falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, tortious interference, and “claims sounding in contract or tort.” Google, Inc. , 3d 1265 (M.D.
In The Briefing , intellectual property attorney Scott Hervey and his guests provide insight in connection with copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, falseadvertising, licensing, promotions, and sweepstakes.
I’m only addressing ICON’s counterclaims for falseadvertising, not the patent part of the ruling. ICON counterclaimed that Peloton has made false claims in advertisements regarding its status as an innovator and as a tech company, e.g., that it was a “very hardcore technology company. These claims did survive.
9, 2023) Along with updating its previous decision (I didn’t see anything that affected the Lanham Act analysis of the key issue of whether a retailer can sue a supplier for falseadvertising), the court addressed a motion to dismiss by defendant ViaClean.
Algthough Logan published the photos on Wikimedia under a Creative Commons license, he alleged that Meta stripped the photos of all identifying information and falsely identified itself as the owner by displaying its “copyright tag on the bottom of each Facebook user page,” breaching the license. 3d 1137 (9th Cir. 3d 1300 (Fed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content