This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
First off today, Joe Tidy at the BBC reports that the City of London Police have arrested three people and shuttered the website of a group that was running an unauthorized clone of Club Penguin, the Disney socialmedia site/game that shuttered in 2017. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.
Instead, XXL relied on a fairuse defense, which works: Nature of use: “the video was the subject of the news story and because the article added new information and context about the contents of the video.” The court also says it can’t consider the evidence that Mediaite used embedding on a motion to dismiss.
The school moved to dismiss on fairuse grounds, and the district court granted the motion and awarded attorneys’ fees to the school. (I Bell appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which easily affirms the fairuse dismissal and attorneys’ fees. Nature of the Use. ” Bell sued anyways. Nature of the Work.
25, 2022) “The softball team and flag corps at a public high school outside Fort Worth used their Twitter accounts to post a motivational passage from sports psychologist Keith Bell’s book, Winning Isn’t Normal.” He sued; the court of appeals affirms a finding of fairuse on a motion to dismiss and an award of attorneys’ fees.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. In May, State Farm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit (read here) , arguing that Atari was “seeking a windfall for the inadvertent and fleeting use of a decades-old arcade game.”
The realm of content protection may yet have an AI savior waiting in the wings, but until a model can accurately determine fairuse and conduct complex, error-free investigations, humans retain the upper hand. 2m+ Settlement Agreed The closure of these services will be governed by a settlement agreement between ACE and three U.S.-based
Bell waited almost a year to notify the school that two of its socialmedia accounts had infringed the copyright. The school district removed both posts and told Bell it was a “teachable moment” After settlement negotiations broke down, Bell sued for copyright infringement.
His order does not restrain Mattel from filing an infringement suit which is probably why the studio decided to change the songs name as part of a settlement deal with Mattel. The Indian counterpart of fairuse in trademark law is embodied in Section 30 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. C) Any non-commercial use of a mark.
Neither does the group chase down people who share its music in a friendly way on socialmedia or file-sharing networks. However, if critics (so-called ‘apostates’) use Watch Tower copyrighted content to challenge its authority or practices, bad things can follow. Devine Intervention Levels The Playing Field.
However, the announcement was made through a socialmedia post by the Minister and no official statement has been published on the website. Granules India, the Delhi HC recorded a settlement after Granules’ undertaking for exemption under Section 107A a.k.a Read for more on this update! the Bolar provision. Defendant No.
On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. xxii] Keyboard Cat Wins a Settlement with Maker of the Game “Scribblenauts” , THE SPOKESMAN-REV. Minc Law (Sept. 1, 2013), [link]. xxv] U.S.
This is a form of stringency and affects incentives for non-divisibility, especially given US statutory damages and injunctions. No balancing required—recognizing fairuse is not required for platforms, nor is giving users much procedure. Stringency can thus be non obvious, contested/contestable, and downside risk matters.
Two prior blog posts on Bell’s litigation efforts: FairUse Protects High Schools Use of Inspirational MemeBell v. I’m displaying only a portion of it to further strengthen my fairuse position so I’m less likely to be Bell’s next target. Bell has filed at least 25 copyright lawsuits.
The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fairuse by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes.
This prompted a quick settlement which allowed the chair to remain in the picture. Fairuse and de minimis defenses are often unreliable, and even if you have a solid case, defending copyright infringement lawsuits is an expensive proposition. ” However, for every “ Hey, that’s my church picnic quilt! .”
The court then issued an order requiring the parties to engage in settlement discussions and set deadlines for the conferences. In August 2022, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement, stating that they were close to reaching an agreement, and requested that the court extend the deadlines. This time, in Bell v.
The court found that this was nominative fairuse, which provides a defense in the Ninth Circuit when a trademarked product or service isn’t readily identifable without use of the mark, the use is no greater than necessary, and the defendant does nothing else to suggest confusion.
” The Court held that 2 Live Crew’s version qualified as a non-infringing fairuse because it was a parody that sufficiently transformed the Orbison original. On March 8, 1994, The New York Times reported 2 Live Crew’s Supreme Court fairuse victory. Lil’ Joe Makes a Deal.
As described here in a previous post: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected an artistic intent or purpose test for fairuse on March 26, 2021, in The Andy Warhol Foundation v. ” Then, as I noted , the US Supreme Court decided a few days later, “in Google v. at 7-9) were transformative.,”
As Donald Trump used every available resource to ensure his tenancy at the most recognizable house in the United States was extended, some socialmedia platforms had adopted an unorthodox approach to his accounts. Or even negotiating the terms of the settlement Grant offered in August 2020 before filing the lawsuit.
Aside from the good ol’ “things happen” truism and an attack on the validity of Grant’s sound recording registration, Trump’s principal defense in the lawsuit is fairuse. Drop me a note in the comments below or on socialmedia @copyrightlately. He can’t have it both ways.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content