Remove Fair Use Remove Reference Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

American Airlines’ Copyright Victory Is a Flight To Nowhere

Copyright Lately

At trial, American focused primarily on its trademark infringement and unfair competition claims, arguing that Skiplagged misled consumers by making itself appear like an authorized agent of the airline, in part by using American’s logo in ways that could cause confusion. Here, the jury sided with the airline, awarding $4.7

article thumbnail

Trademarks as a Barrier to Free-Speech: An Examination of the MetaBirkins Dispute

SpicyIP

This article seeks to examine how trademark law interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. C) Any non-commercial use of a mark.

Trademark 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

If the Word “Emoji” is a Protectable Trademark, What Happens Next?–Emoji GmbH v. Schedule A Defendants

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

finds the nature of Plaintiff’s trademark to be relevant to the willfulness inquiry, as it raises the concern that many persons might innocently use the word “emoji” in commerce without awareness of Plaintiff’s intellectual property rights. The trademark registrations discourage that outcome.

Trademark 124
article thumbnail

Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?

43(B)log

In 2022, the relationship dissolved; Portkey objected to Venkateswaran’s alleged references to Portkey and its asserted trademarks since 2022. Anyway, you can’t use “any indication of non-affiliation” to avoid an infringement claim, per JDI. he remains associated with Plaintiffs and their business” plausibly alleged bad faith.

article thumbnail

The First Amendment Limits Trademark Rights, But How?–Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademark law area, and was one of the signatories of the First Amendment Professors amicus brief filed in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. by guest blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.

Blogging 116
article thumbnail

Trademark and Copyright Cases to Watch in 2023

The IP Law Blog

In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Andy Warhol Foundation made fair use of a photo of the late artist Prince. In short, the matter at issue will address when a work is sufficiently transformative to qualify for fair use protection under the Copyright Act. We’ll start with Andy Warhol Foundation v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Jack Daniels argued the look-alike dog toy could confuse consumers and that its reference to “the Old No. 2 on your Tennessee carpet” tarnishes the Jack Daniels trademark. With regard to dilution, the Ninth Circuit held that VIP was protected by the fair use exception for noncommercial uses. 1125(c)(3)(A).

Fair Use 130