This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Why is it acceptable for Carolyn Keene to be a pseudonym for over a dozen authors penning Nancy Drew stories, but not ok for Cristiane Serruya to use ghostwriters when producing books with her name (outside the fact the books were plagiarized from other sources). The answer is that plagiarism is complicated.
Film company sues Tesla over Blade Runner clips, NBA teams deny socialmedia infringement, and News Corp sues Perplexity The post 3 Count: Blade Runner 2024 appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
First off today, Joe Tidy at the BBC reports that the City of London Police have arrested three people and shuttered the website of a group that was running an unauthorized clone of Club Penguin, the Disney socialmedia site/game that shuttered in 2017. The post 3 Count: Clubbed Penguin appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
Rules around fairuse, notice and takedown and so forth are replaced by bots that are incapable of understanding the nuances of the law itself. Back when I first launched Plagiarism Today in 2005, the internet was a very different place. Socialmedia silos like Twitter, Facebook and TikTok dominate the landscape.
Analysing the impact of Indian copyright law on fairuse in academic and critical writing. Evaluating the doctrine of fairuse for Indian socialmedia platforms in light of global cases. Exploring the intersection of defamation and copyright in Indian socialmedia journalism.
Let’s Talk About Derivative Works Subject to fairuse and other defenses, a copyright owner has the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work. Drop me a comment below or @copyrightlately on socialmedia. Stability AI Ltd. and will post updates here on Copyright Lately.
” But in McGucken , the court denied summary judgment, not only as to the server test, but on Newsweek’s implied license and fairuse defenses too. Plagiarism much?” Let me know your thoughts in the comments below or on your favorite socialmedia platform @copyright lately.
Designed to be freely available licensed or public domain; we occasionally usefairuse images where no free image is available, such as when a famous work has been destroyed. Not only are some services different from socialmedia, one socialmedia platform may differ very much from each other.
This prompted Dorland to first report the alleged plagiarism to a wide variety of groups and worked on getting the story pulled while working through lawyers to demand financial compensation. However, today, I want to focus on just one aspect of this story: The plagiarism. What Larson did there was clearly plagiarism.
I understand a lot of you may be upset that I saw a photo on socialmedia and loved it enough to imitate it in a very different style. ” The case raises questions of fairuse and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works. Bottom Line.
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fairuse in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fairuse.
Cross-cultural plagiarism: adaptation of a film to a different cultural context. It’s like using quotes. Might be different than when a company uses TM on a socialmedia post. Can the NFAI screen the movie? The Hollywood movie is now out of copyright according to Indian law. rights so now it can be shown.
Dorland alerted publishers, writing conferences, and journalists to what she considered Larson’s plagiarism and ethical betrayal. The copyright claims came down to a fairuse analysis, something that has occupied discussions by this poster before. ” Let’s see why. ’ Piccone v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content