This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. Under these agreements, PTRA is the exclusive owner of the Rose Bowl Game trademark and owns the mark for use in connection with the annual game.
In an April 2023 summary judgment ruling , the plaintiff established that it “possesses the legally protectable, incontestable trademarks TEXAS TAMALE and TEXAS TAMALE COMPANY.” The court said that the trademark owner had been using the trademark since 1985 and registered the trademark in 2006.
The year saw many trademark stories in the news as backlogs continued at the USPTO even while application filing numbers dropped from their all time highs during the two previous years. Here are the biggest trademark stories of 2022 that we have been following at EMP&A. Celebrity trademark messes. Queen of Christmas.
14, 2023) Plaintiffs sued defendants for state and federal trademark infringement and related claims. Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing body and league for the sport of axe throwing and uses the trademark “WATL” to market and publicize the axe throwing league. Cold Steel Inc., 2023 WL 2372059, No. 3d at 1177.
It has more than 400 commercial customers, including global enterprises such as Walmart, Comcast, Cisco, and eBay, and also does substantial business with government agencies, including US agencies. It has trademark registrations for the word mark “NEO4J.”
Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated falseadvertising claims don’t. VFB owns several trademark registrations including “Vampire,” specifically for wine and pre-mixed alcoholic beverages other than beer, and “Vampyre,” specifically for spirits.
sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. This case has the potential to define the scope of trademark rights against unauthorized uses in the world of NFTs. Nike currently has multiple pending trademark applications for their NFTs.
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
They try to articulate claims for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false association, and falseadvertising. Thus, “[i]n context, the contested button is not false association or falseadvertising.”
Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! This is a joke, but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen.)
Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. The court also found that the alleged use of the Roblox name was not, as a matter of law, nominative fairuse. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
Weintraub Tobin’s Intellectual Property podcast, The Briefing , published nearly 50 episodes this year covering a variety of IP issues relating to trademark, copyright, and entertainment law. 3: What Now for FairUse After Warhol v. As we look back, we want to share The Briefing’s most popular episodes in 2023.
28, 2022) Defendants allegedly both disparaged Homelight and infringed its trademark, which seems a weird combo, but half of the TM claims aren’t as contradictory as they seem—the other half really are. The court found that trademark infringement was plausibly pled, which is unfortunate. Homelight, Inc. Shkipin, 2022 WL 16528142, No.
Every time a court uses Rogers, it’s covertly holding that it would be unconstitutional to apply a broader set of rights; we’re tailoring the test with this in mind. But the test doesn’t say 1A every time; you just use the test. Ramsey: do it w/broad fairuse/general rules.
Weintraub Tobin’s Intellectual Property podcast, The Briefing , published nearly 50 episodes this year covering a variety of IP issues relating to trademark, copyright, and entertainment law. 3: What Now for FairUse After Warhol v. As we look back, we want to share The Briefing’s most popular episodes in 2023.
She allegedly falsely represented that she was authorized to deliver Londra’s “recording artist and songwriting services. Big Ligas sued for tortious interference and for falseadvertising and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. Falseadvertising: “That Ms.
Hearty thanks to Colette Durst , Stephen Lee , and Susan Perera , for generously sharing their insights and perspectives about trademark nominative fairuse. In case you missed it, here is my Trademark Nominative FairUse of Another’s Logo post from March, leading up to the 2020 AIPLA Annual Spring Meeting.
Lolita Darden, Stopping Zombie Company Trademark Abuse and Consumer Deception in Trademark Abandonment Cases Based on clinic work. b/c standard for proving abandonment is not consistent through US. A: Falseadvertising context: FTC/state AGs. Protectability doctrines take this into account as well as fairuse.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Nominative fairuse factors: Also for a factfinder.
24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. And Peninsula cited a prior trademark prosecution by PennEngineering for admissions that the product design is functional.
Both sides now claim the other is liable for falseadvertising, among other claims.” Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship.
The Case of Upcycling”, Irene Calboli and Siroos Tanner address the IP dimension of upcycling and explore ways to prevent this environmentally friendly practice from being hindered by claims of potential trademark and copyright infringement. The analysis concludes with a review of recent US cases.
Tiffany filed the present application against Costco two months after it stopped using the “Tiffany” mark in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging trademark infringement, counterfeiting falseadvertising among other things. It rejected Tiffany’s claim of trademark counterfeiting.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertisinguses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Dougies for diapers.
Mark Lemley, Mark McKenna, James Weinstein, and I also filed an amicus brief pointing out that, even if there had been a party (there wasn't), it still wouldn't have infringed ASU's trademarks. Although doctrines like Rogers v.
We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. Bolt Technology v. First, in Toyota v. Tech Square which was passed against a cancellation petition filed by Toyota against the registration of “Alphard” by Tech Square.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
But that would run up against a strong preference for truthful speech, especially if the alternative seems to be that PNC can control what apps its customers can use. It was ok to use a qualitative analysis of “bad press” that allegedly came about from Plaid’s screens’/CSRs’ criticism of PNC.
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. On websites, emails, and mailers, LHB uses Axon’s Taser character, stylized word, and design marks, often in proximity to its own marks. But is it a nominative fairuse?
Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademarkuse is the central concern of trademark law. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties.
Jack Daniel’s argued that the toy infringed on their trademark, as the shape of the whiskey [bottle] is closely associated with their brand. They also argued that the toy could lead to confusion among consumers, as it could be mistaken for an official Jack Daniel’s product. ” Id. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d
Challenges Under IP Law Dark patterns are deceptive or manipulative design elements or techniques used in user interfaces to trick users into taking actions they may not want to take. This can lead to trademark infringement, as it involves using another entity’s intellectual property to deceive users.
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fairuse in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fairuse.
However, it provides both good challenges and opportunities under trademark law. The blog covers how trademarks evolve in the era of social media and influencer marketing, analyzing legal uncertainties, protection mechanisms, and best practices for commercial usage. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
Begin with legislative action: Trademark Modernization Act, Which introduces three of the big themes of the year: (1) trademarkuse, (2) the harm of infringement, and (3) the role of the First Amendment in limiting the scope of trademark rights. Slides here.
Changes in Trademark Law and Evidentiary Rules Introduction: Jake Linford Before courts admitted surveys routinely, they were concerned about hearsay. Instead of surveys, can we look at things like Google results or large text databases reflective of use in a particular community? Some objections go to the weight of the evidence.
I’m going to talk briefly about last term’s Jack Daniels case—a trademark infringement and dilution case—as well as Elster, argued last week, in which the Justices appeared inclined to reject a First Amendment challenge to the refusal to register the claimed mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for t-shirts. Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content