This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In the wake of a global pandemic, an ongoing war in Europe, and a new U.S. president taking the world on a surprise mystery tour to somewhere, Season 7 of Black Mirror faces the show’s toughest test following its Netflix debut on Thursday. Ensuring each episode has a provocative, meaningful impact is getting harder in a world where the highly improbable seems to happen much more frequently.
A European Patent Office (EPO) opposition is often the first line of defense for a party seeking to invalidate a European patent. Oppositions must be filed within nine months of the patents grant, and they offer a centralized way to revoke or limit the patent in all designated states. With the Unified Patent Ccourt (UPC) now providing a parallel central revocation mechanism (with no deadline) for UPC member states, it was inevitable that some patents would face both an EPO opposition and a UPC r
DECODING PRIOR ART IN BIOTECHNOLOGY: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES Biotechnology is one of the High-Tech industry with innovation and progress in the field of genomics, molecular biology and pharmaceuticals which redefine and provide new perspectives to the healthcare and agriculture. However, in this fast paced technologically dominated world, it becomes very important to become as a pioneer in order to secure an intellectual property rights without any issues.
The IPKat proudly presents the Kat news of the past week. Courses 30 June 18 July 2025: Licensing Transactions in Intellectual Property Interested in how to navigate technologies and negotiate transactions relating to AI, blockchain, biotechnology and other emerging technology? Then join an intense, practice-oriented 3-week summer program from the Bucerius Law School in Hamburg.
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
A Pennsylvania jury on Friday awarded $7.25 million to a baking chemicals maker that claimed a former partner-turned-rival and two ex-employees stole trade secrets, following a weeklong trial in Pittsburgh's federal court.
Originally posted 2013-10-08 13:01:57. Republished by Blog Post PromoterAmerica’s greatest natural Trademark Trial and Appeal Board resource, John Welch, has posted part one of his Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011. From his introduction: Dilution by blurring made a particularly big splash in the TTAB pool during that last few months of the year.
Keep up with the ever changing world of IP with SpicyIPs Weekly Review! In the second week of April we have a post looking closely at the Draft CRI Guidelines 2025 (deadline today for submitting comments!), a food for thought post asking: in a world where access to knowledge is increasingly sought, the question isnt just who gets to read but also what gets read, and why?
Keep up with the ever changing world of IP with SpicyIPs Weekly Review! In the second week of April we have a post looking closely at the Draft CRI Guidelines 2025 (deadline today for submitting comments!), a food for thought post asking: in a world where access to knowledge is increasingly sought, the question isnt just who gets to read but also what gets read, and why?
Last week, I participated in oral arguments in Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc., at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Appeal No. 23-2140). I used Rev.com to create a transcript of the hearing, below. Note that no transcript is perfect, and a hearing is challenging to transcribe. You can listen to the full audio itself at this link to the file from the CAFC.
Long post ahead! Last week, we ran a post informing our readers about the Draft Guidelines for Examination of Computer-Related Inventions (CRI), 2025 (hereinafter draft guidelines), which was made open for public consultations. Our readers would know that the last CRI guidelines were issued in 2017. On a prima facie reading of the draft guidelines, one can notice some interesting changes, as the new draft includes a discussion relating to recent jurisprudence and examples of patentable claims.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content