This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Originally posted 2014-04-09 07:50:25. Republished by Blog Post PromoterSee, we don’t agree with Public Citizen all the time! Read on, via the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): [EFF] along with Public Citizen and Public Knowledge urged a U.S. court of appeals Wednesday to reject jewelry-maker Tiffany’s attempt to rewrite trademark law and create new barriers for […] The post EFF backs eBay in Tiffany spat appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION.
Kat rescued in St. Peter's square Overwhelmed by AI-related commentaries and looking for something that thinks at least partly out of the box? Then, this is for you. Shortly before the Holidays, the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State released the Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence ( here for the English version : note, however, that the English version is not entirely accurate insofar as it translates from Italian) to be applied within this state as of 1 January 2025.
After decades of work, supporting a stated mission to destroy online piracy, rightsholders today understand the enormous task ahead. A few prominent outliers aside, more pragmatic terms to describe ongoing anti-piracy work, may even be gaining traction. A staple of law enforcement agencies everywhere, ‘disruption’ is perhaps the most accurate term to describe successes in the context of an expansive, oversupplied, yet adaptive piracy market.
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
In his Guestpost below, Konstantin Voropaev (Elbert, Nazaretsky, Rakov & Co) explores how two recent decisions from opposite sides of the Atlantic, the US Federal Circuit decision in Janssen Pharmaceuticals v. Teva and the UPC decision in 10x Genomics , signal a potential convergence in patent obviousness analysis. Konstantin argues that both courts appear to be moving towards a more contextual evaluation of prior art, departing from traditional rigid frameworks.
On this 76th Republic Day, we stand together, bound by the threads of unity woven into the fabric of our tricolour. It is a day to honour the visionaries who etched the values of justice, equality, and liberty into the soul of our Constitution, gifting us the framework of democracy that empowers every Indian voice. As the dawn breaks and the flag unfurls, we feel the pulse of our nationa blend of diversity, resilience, and boundless potential.
This is a long-running litigation battle over Google’s advertising practices. In 2021, many individual advertiser claims were consolidated into an MDL in SDNY. Four years and 900+ docket entries later, the SNDY court holds that two plaintiffs’ claims must go to arbitration. Because other advertisers probably have similar facts, I assume much of this litigation is headed to arbitration unless the appeals court intervenes.
This is a long-running litigation battle over Google’s advertising practices. In 2021, many individual advertiser claims were consolidated into an MDL in SDNY. Four years and 900+ docket entries later, the SNDY court holds that two plaintiffs’ claims must go to arbitration. Because other advertisers probably have similar facts, I assume much of this litigation is headed to arbitration unless the appeals court intervenes.
The “Mind the Gap” trademark dispute centers on the legal conflicts arising from the use of the iconic phrase, widely recognized in the context of the London Undergrounds public announcements. The case delves into key issues of trademark registration, the scope of protection for widely used phrases, and potential conflicts with public domain usage.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
52 
Let's personalize your content