This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This edition's chosen city is New Orleans. Opportunities Making Digital Markets Work for People – Fairness, Efficiency and Consumer Welfare in Dialogue The Centre for Business Law at Lund University (ACLU) has launched a call for papers on the the theme of digital markets, ahead of a symposium that will be held in Lund in February 2025.
recent circular on procurement of drugs, non-obviousness test under the patentslaw, and the Hamburg Regional Court’s decision in Robert Kneschke v LAION e.V. Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personality rights, Govt. Anything we are missing out on?
Moral jeopardy of s tem cell technologies The patentapplication at issue in T 1553/22 related to methods for producing human-pig chimeras designed to generate humanised blood vessels and blood cells for therapeutic applications ( EP16759528.9 , Regents of the University of Minnesota).
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of the posts on IPO’s patentapplication rejection of HIV drug Dolutegravir, another judgement in the long-running Section 3(k) saga, this time on the patentability of business methods and the DHC IPD’s Annual Report 2023-24. In this post by Kartikeya S.,
This is perhaps not surprising, given that patentapplications are not published until 18 months after they are filed, and that OpenAI's major innovation of ChatGPT was first released about 2 years ago. This year, eleven OpenAI patents and patentapplications have been published.
This is a book review of The Future of Intellectual Property , edited by Daniel J. Underwood Chair in Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, US. In the introduction, Gervais explains that the approach to discussing IP law reform taken in this edited collection is considering both primary and secondary level reform.
Having freelanced as a patent research analyst, he developed an interest in patent prosecution and in exploring the Patents Act through various interpretative approaches. He is currently engaged in WIPO-Harvard Law School Course in PatentLaw and Global Public Health. Article 3.2
This is a review of the twentieth edition of Terrell on the Law of Patents , which was released at the end of June 2024. Since the last edition in 2020, there have been significant developments in UK intellectual property law, although the effects of Brexit have been somewhat limited in the realm of patentlaw.
Over on FOSS Patents, Florian Mueller commented on the new German patentlaw, questioning its ability to make a real difference to issues such as the so-called injunction gap, and reported on the newest patent division of the Munich I Regional Court starting operations. Picture from Pexels on Pixabay.
The 1952 Patent Act edited the law to allow for reissue for “error[s]” where the patentee claimed either “more or less than he had a right to claim.” Likewise, the MPEP finds impermissible recapture only when the original surrender relied on by the patentapplicant to overcome the prior art.
Huawei to determine global FRAND rates, even where some of the parties did not agree to its jurisdiction or had initiated FRAND rate determination proceedings in Chinese courts, appears to challenge the territorial and statutory nature of patentlaw.
India- To register a patent and thereby enjoy protection against infringement in India, a product or a process must have an ‘inventive step’, should be capable of industrial application and should not fall within the categories that are explicitly defined as ‘not inventions’.
The Board of Appeal decision in T 0420/19 was one of the first to interpret Pepper ( G 3/19 ), which related to the exclusion of plants produced by "essentially biological processes" from patentability. natural breeding methods as opposed to genetic modification) should be excluded from patentability.
The cover article of the May 2024 edition of the CIPA Journal proposed a new test for inventive step using AI. The article proposes: " Suppose a new patentapplication is received and converted into an embedding space using a large language model. The article was inspired by the EPO's AI assisted search tool, AI-PreSearch.
The same is also detailed in the Greek PatentLaw (1733/1987), Article 5(1) of which provides that: to accept that the functionality of the computer program can be protected by copyright, would amount to making it possible to monopolise ideas, to the detriment of technological progress and industrial development.
” In the context of patentapplications, the notice provides specific examples of how the duty of disclosure may be implicated when using AI tools. ” Preparing evidence of patentability or unpatentability : “AI systems could also be used in the submission of evidence of patentability or unpatentability (e.g.,
No, according to various patent offices and patentlaws around the world. Patentlaw, the term “inventor” is defined as an “individual” or “individuals” who “invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention.” Patentlaw requires at least one human inventor.
While most patent offices, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), have ruled that AI cannot be listed as an inventor, the debate continues. As AI technologies evolve, regulators and lawmakers may need to revisit patentlaws to accommodate the unique challenges posed by AI innovation.
In the wake of Anurag Chaurasia’s (paywalled) Nature piece cautioning Indian scientists to conduct due diligence before using CRISPR gene editing tools, Prashant Reddy T looks closely at the patent issues raised by Chaurasia in his paper. and the University of California, on who exactly is entitled to the patents for Cas9.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content