This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In the realm of intellectualproperty, copyright and moralrights play pivotal roles in safeguarding the interests of creators. While copyright primarily focuses on the economic rights associated with creative works, moralrights emphasize the personal and reputational interests of the creators.
The missing bit: moralrights. Moralrights have not been sufficiently discussed in the context of AI/ML. Moralrights generally include the paternity right (the right to be attributed as the/an author of the work) and the integrity right (the right not to have the work mutilated).
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping IntellectualPropertyrights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). The volume is a beautiful testimony to the work of late Shamnad Basheer, who co-edited the first edition.
During his lifetime, Trenet assigned his economic rights to these songs to his music publisher, Editions Raoul Breton. After Trenet’s death, all his patrimony (including the moralrights to the songs) were inherited by his friend, Georges El Assidi. 121-1 of the French IntellectualProperty Code.
. • Study Guide to the Patents Acts (14th edition), by Doug Ealey. And the winner is: The Proportionality Test in European Patent Law (Bloomsbury) by Léon Dijkman Best Copyright Law Book The nominations were: • Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (2nd edition), by Elenora Rosati. •
This is a book review of Reforming IntellectualProperty , edited by Gustavo Ghidini, Professor Emeritus, University of Milan and Senior Professor of IntellectualProperty and Competition Law, LUISS University and Valeria Falce, Jean Monnet Professor in European Innovation Policy, European University of Rome.
This is a review of Guidebook to IntellectualProperty (seventh edition) authored by Sir Robin Jacob (8 New Square and UCL, Matthew Fisher (UCL) and Lynne Chave (UCL). Kat approved This book is aimed at those who are new to the subject of intellectualproperty.
This is a book review of “ Harmonizing IntellectualProperty Law for a Trans-Atlantic Knowledge Economy ”, edited by Péter Mezei, Hannibal Travis, and Anett Pogácsás. A meow-velous cover! Part 1: Pursuit of Harmonization The first section delves into successful aspects of legal harmonization.
The Handbook of Fashion Law, edited by Eleonora Rosati and Irene Calboli, masterfully managed to fill this gap. Yet, despite the significant traction this arguably newfound discipline has gained, a comprehensive legal scholarship systematically codifying its various components in a single work had been missing until now.
IntellectualProperty Generally Katfriend Thorsten Lauterbach reviewed the book, Teaching IntellectualProperty Law: Strategy and Management , edited by Sabine Jacques and Ruth Soetendorp (in which this Kat co-authored a chapter). patents and trade marks) and the protection of traditional knowledge.
The co-defendants were ordered to cease all acts of exploitation of the work and to compensate the author for the infringement of her intellectualpropertyrights, including moralrights. More from our authors: Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose € 265
In March 2022, the Canadian IntellectualProperty Office (“CIPO”) allowed its first artificial intelligence (AI)-authored copyright registration of a painting co-created by the AI tool, RAGHAV Painting App (“RAGHAV”), and the IP lawyer who created RAGHAV, Ankit Sahni. How will this apply in Canada?
This way of doing things with the help of generative AI technology carries numerous legal challenges of intellectualproperty violation. In doing so, it calls into question a fundamental assumption of many traditional intellectualproperty (IP) frameworks as copyright laws only protect works created by humans and not AI.
The Court held that a musical box infringed of an author’s moralrights. Patents Hayleigh Bosher gave some thoughts on the new patent service of the UK IntellectualProperty Office (IPO). Anastasiia Kyrylenko analysed a decision issued by the French Cour de cassation on 8 March 2023.
This article delves into the saga’s central copyright issues and the concept of moralrights, and compares the situation in the US to how it might have unfolded under EU law. Another significant divergence lies in the recognition of moralrights.
Underwood Chair in Law, Vanderbilt University), Noam Shemtov (Professor in IntellectualProperty and Technology Law/Deputy Head of CCLS, Queen Mary University of London), Haralambos Marmanis (Executive Vice President and CTO, CCC), and Catherine Zaller Rowland (Vice President and General Counsel, CCC). ↩︎ See Jane C. Int’l Comm.
This Conference marks the 25th anniversary of the Boards of Appeal and will bring together leading intellectualproperty experts from multiple jurisdictions, representing a broad spectrum of professional interests with representatives from some of the leading IP offices, lawmakers, judges, academics, and lawyers.
Children provide a unique contribution to the discourse on creativity, copyright and intellectualproperty. In that same role, any adult caring for a child is called to act as steward of that property – the intellectualproperty of the young author. Image by bethL via Pixabay. 1197 and C?683/17 683/17 – Cofemel ).
33(1)) This sui generis right is vested in the authors of the computer program, their heirs, persons to whom the authors or their heirs transferred economic rights to the computer program, or the lawful users of the computer program (Art. 12), but does not include moralrights.
For instance, moralrights may be at stake, as well as alternative forms of protection that may limit the availability of works, such as cultural heritage-related rules or contractual provisions. When copyright is involved, both economic and moralrights issues are at stake. Copyright implies exclusive prerogatives.
In 2011, Mr T directed and edited a short film entitled “ Rêve d'enfants ”. 111-2 of the French Code of IntellectualProperty (CPI) , the court recalled that “ a work is deemed to have been created independently of any public disclosure, by the mere fact of its creation, even if unfinished, from the author's conception.
Hayleigh Bosher and Coran Darling giving evidence at the Inquiry Artificial intelligence is a highly debated topic in the intellectualproperty field currently. With the sudden popularity and accessibility of AI systems such as Open AI’s ChatGPT, there has been a lot of attention regarding the regulation and governance of the industry.
However, the Court rejected the action as: not legal, insofar as it concerned the protection of recipes as works of intellectualproperty; and unfounded, because recipes are assimilated to ideas and not to works enjoying copyright protection under Greek (and EU) law. dishes and seasonings) as works of IP. (1) Emphasis added.)
One of the most frequently asked questions intellectualproperty lawyers hear from members of the art community is, “When should I use a model release form, and what should it say?” That’s understandable since the answer can vary from state to state! using street photography techniques) but rather how the image is used (i.e.,
Though Kashtanova edited the Midjourney images, the Office held that the creativity supplied did not constitute authorship. However, academics question whether moralrights, which are not part of the US regime, will extend to AI authors and if AI authorship will alter the copyright term of the last living author’s death plus 70 years.
The BGH reasoned that a claim for non-material damages was weakened by the fact that there were doubts as to whether the relevant public in that case even attributed the edited images to the author at all. IntellectualProperty Law in China, 2nd edition. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. by Christopher Heath. €
Schifano’s heirs sued again the Foundation, claiming violation of their economic and moralrights over the works. IntellectualProperty Law in China, 2nd edition. If performed for teaching and scientific research purposes, the use should be non-commercial and for illustration only. ”. by Christopher Heath. €
Copyright Act to provide living creators of “works of visual art” [2] with certain non-transferable “moralrights” with respect to their artwork. [3] VARA VARA was enacted in 1990 as an amendment to the U.S. ” [5] The latter has become known as the “public presentation” exception. 17 U.S.C. §
This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moralrights. Parts 2 to 4 will address exploitation rights, related rights, exceptions and limitations, copyright contract law and enforcement. Moralrights (Sections 12-14 UrhG). IntellectualProperty Law in China, 2nd edition.
student at Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur and is passionate about IntellectualProperty Law and Media and Entertainment Law, with a strong interest in ADR. Sidenote: Another important issue that the order missed to address is the justification behind its prima facie finding on infringement of the plaintiff’s moralrights.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content