Editing Intellectual Property Law Ownership 
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 16, 2024
This is a book review of Teaching Intellectual Property Law: Strategy and Management edited by Sabine Jacques, Associate Professor in Information Technology, Media and Intellectual Property Law, University of East Anglia Law School and Ruth Soetendorp, Visiting Academic, City University of London and Professor Emerita, Bournemouth University.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 26, 2022
“Web3 cannot and should not be reduced to blockchain when the real shift is towards user ownership of digital assets… This definitional shift focuses attention on what assets can be legally owned and the meaning of ownership “rights,” more generally, in the emerging digital spaces of web3.”. . user ownership of digital assets)?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 31, 2022
Typically, electronic dance music is produced and edited by artists using their own equipment, and at their own initiative. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. Intellectual Property Law in China, 2nd edition. In such cases, too, the artists will probably be deemed ‘phonogram producers’.
The IPKat
MAY 17, 2023
This is a review of Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage , edited by Irini Stamatoudi , Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Cultural Heritage Law at the University of Nicosia. Amineddoleh, Pedro Henrique D.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
Although the author worked under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement when he penned the movie, the right to ownership was governed by copyright law and not labor law. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. Case date: 30 September 2021.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 26, 2021
Intellectual Property Law in China, 2nd edition. by Jan Bernd Nordemann, Christian Czychowski. € by Christopher Heath. €
Intellectual Property Law Blog
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Thaler included several new legal theories to suggest that his contribution to the Creativity Machine, such as his ownership and prompting of the software, would establish a human component of authorship. In response, Thaler filed a complaint in the district court challenging the denial of his copyright application.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
114 
Let's personalize your content