article thumbnail

Addressing the Challenges of Documentation

IP.com

In order for an inventor to file for patent protection, their invention must be carefully documented. This is true whether the inventor is working alone or is part of a. The post Addressing the Challenges of Documentation appeared first on IP.com - IP Innovation and Analytics.

article thumbnail

All Inventors are Human; All Humans are Inventors

Patently-O

Vidal ask the Supreme Court one simple question: Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term ‘inventor’ to human beings alone? In Thaler’s case, the PTO and courts short-circuited the patentability analysis because the purported inventor is a machine, and machines simply are not permitted to be inventors.

Inventor 122
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

DABUS: An AI inventor or the Emperor's New Clothes?

The IPKat

The question of whether it should be possible to name artificial intelligence (AI) code as an inventor on a patent application continues to dog patent offices and courts around the world. The US District Court, by contrast, recently found against naming an algorithm as an inventor ( IPWatchDog ). outside the competence of the EPO".

Inventor 111
article thumbnail

Impact of AI on Global IP Systems

IIPRD

This document outlines the AI/IP Research Project and offers preliminary policy suggestions for the creation of AI-related IP legislation. If such products were created by a human inventor, they could be eligible for patent protection. A human inventor serves as the central figure in the design of the patent system.

IP 98
article thumbnail

Discussion of Inventors’ Path in Expert’s Obviousness Opinion Warrants Partial Exclusion in Bench Trial

JD Supra Law

In the weeks preceding a recent Hatch-Waxman bench trial, a district court excluded portions of an expert’s opinion on obviousness that addressed internal documents and inventor testimony concerning the “inventors’ path” to arriving at the invention, finding that such portions of the opinion amounted to impermissible hindsight. .

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Redefines Prior Art Requirements Under § 102(e)/102(a)(2): In re Riggs

Patently-O

.” When an application is filed but not yet published, it exists as a confidential document at the USPTO that no competitor can access. When that application eventually publishes (typically 18 months after filing), it suddenly becomes prior art — backdated to its original filing date.

Art 70
article thumbnail

Bitcoin 'Inventor' Struggles To Explain Conflicting Evidence

IP Law 360

Attorneys for deceased computer programmer Dave Kleiman on Monday hammered self-professed bitcoin inventor Craig Wright with documents in which he described Kleiman as his business partner despite his claims in multibillion-dollar litigation that the two were just friends.