Remove Designs Remove Patent Application Remove Presentation
article thumbnail

Key Rules and Cases for Patent Practitioners Working on AI Patent Applications

Intellectual Property Law Blog

To overcome this interpretation, the Applicant can (1) present a sufficient showing to establish that the claim limitation recites sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid interpretation under § 112(f); or (2) amend the claim limitation in a way that avoids interpretation under § 112(f) (e.g., In In re Appl.

article thumbnail

USPTO Adapts to CAFC’s New Guidelines: What Design Patent Examiners Need to Know

Patently-O

GM decision, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its examiners providing updated guidance and examination instructions in light of the court’s overturning of the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for determining obviousness of design patents.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Key Rules and Cases for Patent Practitioners Working on AI Patent Applications

Intellectual Property Law Blog

To overcome this interpretation, the Applicant can (1) present a sufficient showing to establish that the claim limitation recites sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid interpretation under § 112(f); or (2) amend the claim limitation in a way that avoids interpretation under § 112(f) (e.g., In In re Appl.

article thumbnail

Magic Language in Patent Applications

Patently-O

First, the search result items are matched with related advertisements, and the search result items that have matched advertisements are designated in some way. However, at this initial step, the claim does not identify how the matching or designation occurs. You know, the present invention is in accordance with this invention.

article thumbnail

AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor?

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a long-anticipated Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115. 2 in the Guidance. Principle No. Principle No.

Inventor 130
article thumbnail

Missed Hearings Do Not Equal Abandonment: Star Scientific Limited v. The Controller Of Patents And Design

SpicyIP

The Court clarified that the Controller should have considered the evidence on the record and that non appearance of the applicant in the hearing will not deem the application as abandoned, unless it was clear from the party’s explicit actions. Can Non Appearance be Regarded as Abandonment of the Application?

Design 85
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

The Board of Appeal had previously announced its decision to refuse two European patent applications naming an algorithm ("DABUS") as the sole inventor at the end of last year ( IPKat ). The patent applications purportedly relate to the inventions of an AI ("DABUS"). It is the ordinary meaning of the term inventor".