LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a long-anticipated Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115. 2 in the Guidance. Principle No.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 31, 2023

This evolving field presents unique challenges and opportunities, requiring a forward-thinking approach to navigate its complexities. Recently, Yuri Eliezer was invited to share his insights on the Conscious Design Podcast , hosted by Ian Peterman. He recommends working with a professional for the search and not offshoring the process.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Vidal , a Federal Court of Appeals case that determined whether AI can be listed as an inventor on a patent application. In this case, Dr. Stephen Thaler created an AI program that he listed as the only inventor on two US patent applications. The USPTO rejected these applications for lack of a proper inventor.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Application 52

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 10, 2024

The findings of this short judgement have possible significant implications on the jurisprudence regarding 3(k) and business methods in the Patent Act. The Controller of Patents and Designs in July which had rejected a patent application for being primarily a claim to business method. 3(k) of Patent Act with Art.

Business 74

Business Invention Privacy Patent Application 74

SpicyIP

MARCH 6, 2023

on 24 February, 2023 (Delhi High Court) In the present case, the plaintiff alleged infringement of its device “Royal” and passing off by the defendant’s adoption of “Zabreen Royal” device. The present order concerns the appeal filed against the order of the trial court in the infringement suit.

Designs 92

Designs Design Music IP 92

The IPKat

AUGUST 29, 2021

TechnoLlama presented an overview of the creator's copyright fight to clean up Pepe's image - and how NFTs fit in. Less terminally online readers of The IPKat may be forgiven for a lack of familiarity with Pepe, the cartoon frog who has become a symbol of both hate and freedom.

Blogging 64

Blogging IP Intellectual Property Editing 64

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 21, 2022

While many Congress attendees from around the world lined up for the Unified Patent Court boot camp and mock trial panels, this Katfriend opted to sample the day’s selection of soft IP offerings. a of the Design Directive. a of the Design Directive. The case shows clearly that virtual goods can also infringe in the real world.

IP 73

IP Reporting Designs Design 73

Patently-O

APRIL 10, 2024

The notice is designed as a reminder to individuals involved in proceedings before the USPTO of that these pertinent rules and policies, and provides suggestions to mitigate the risks associated with AI use. It is not the AI filing work with the USPTO, but rather it is the party and their attorneys. evidence of secondary considerations).

Patent 44

Patent Art Patent Application Confidentiality 44

Intepat

DECEMBER 24, 2021

The question then becomes whether these AI-generated inventions are patentable under present patent law. In our previous blog post, we explained how the EPO released its judgment outlining the reasons for the rejection of two European patent applications in which an AI system was named as the inventor.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Designs 52

The IPKat

MAY 19, 2024

These AI generated structures may be included in patent applications or simply published in depositories on the internet. This approach could be used as a strategy by patent trolls or those looking to block others from patenting new structures.

Patent 60

Patent Art Invention Patent Law 60

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

The Court sets aside the rejection, staying the suit until the rectification application’s disposal within eight months. Ynsect vs The Controller Of Patents on 28 February, 2024 (Delhi High Court) Image from here The appeal challenged the denial of an Indian patent application for insect treatment.

Trademark 59

Trademark Registration Copyright Patent 59

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

With the advances in AI technologies, AI systems create drugs, treatments, designs, and more. While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. But questions still remain. For example, how will the U.S.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

Many glaring issues presented by the Report have been previously discussed by Prof Scaria ( here ), Praharsh ( here ), Adyasha ( here ) and Namratha ( here and here ). In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI.

Inventor 122

Inventor Invention IP Ownership 122

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 18, 2023

The owner gets an exclusive right to use or sell for a specific time period as a legal right under the document which we refer throughout this paper as ‘patent’ The patent system is designed to encourage innovation by protecting the rights of inventors to their inventions. 7] Way ahead? 4] AIR 1960 Mysore 173. [5]

Inventor 52

Inventor Moral Rights Patent Invention 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JUNE 21, 2022

Have a certification of micro entity status in the patent application that is the subject of the appeal. As a pro bono legal assistance program, a key concern was ensuring that the program would effectively reach the people it was designed to serve. For practitioners, the program presents a unique opportunity.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Technology Patent 52

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 27, 2024

This case holds significant importance not only due to the financial implications for the involved parties but also due to its implications for the application of the doctrine of pith and marrow. Furthermore, the Court designated a receiver to supervise and manage this procedure.

Invention 68

Invention Patent Patent Infringement Technology 68

The IPKat

JANUARY 16, 2022

In addition, 75% of the fees charged by IP offices (including national IP offices, EUIPO and the Benelux IP Office) for the registration of trade marks and designs will be reimbursed. For more information on the background to the initiative and EUIPO's call for proposals, click here. Registration should be done through this link.

Intellectual Property 78

Intellectual Property Registration IP Copyright 78

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

With the advances in AI technologies, AI systems create drugs, treatments, designs, and more. While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. But questions still remain. For example, how will the U.S.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 2, 2022

2022) raises a number of important design patent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. The case was remanded back to the USPTO 10 months ago, and not patent has issued yet.

Design Patent 80

Design Patent Art Designs Design 80

SpicyIP

JULY 22, 2023

In this light, this post presents a literature review of the governmental response to AI-related IP issues and the concerns and suggestions of civil society on them. It states that the current IP regime poses problems in the context of generic computer programs because of the way the algorithms are designed and trained using large data sets.

IP 91

IP Intellectual Property Reporting Government 91

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

In the guidance, the USPTO explained that while AI systems and other non-natural persons cannot be listed as inventors on patent applications or patents, the use of an AI system by a natural person does not necessarily preclude a natural person from qualifying as an inventor if the natural person “significantly contributed to the claimed invention.”

Invention 109

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 109

SpicyIP

MAY 6, 2024

The MHC in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (PSITA) in determining non-obviousness. Case Summaries Rich Products Corporation vs The Controller Of Patents & Anr. Reviving, (and at least temporarily settling!) Bulgari S.P.A

Trademark 59

Trademark Invention Licensing Patent 59

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 4, 2021

The book is then presented in four parts, which reflect the four key themes: reforming the fundamental aspects of IP; the impact of artificial intelligence on IP, particularly considering data; specific reforms of copyright and trade mark; and geographical names and indications. The first (chapter 7), by Dan L.

Intellectual Property 141

Intellectual Property IP Ownership Law 141

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

Intellectual property law is all the more a refuge for wordsmiths , linguists , and logophiles , as three recent IP-related matters can help illustrate. I briefly mentioned Abitron here recently , but it deserves more attention in the context of defining the boundaries of US trademark laws and just on the notion of defining words.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 27, 2023

In particular, ChatGPT is a type of “language” model designed to respond with a natural language reply when prompted with a text-based question. The “Chat” in ChatGPT refers to this question-and-answer design, where ChatGPT behaves like a ChatBot. Patent law requires at least one human inventor.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property IP Inventor Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 30, 2022

patent law requires a “human” inventor. Namely, in Thaler a “creativity machine” (a type of Artificial Intelligence (AI)) output and allegedly conceived the subject matter of a patent application allegedly without human involvement. patent law. Vida held that U.S. In 1884, the U.S.

Technology 52

Technology Inventor Invention Copyright 52

Barry Sookman

MAY 4, 2020

This is a question that is being studied including by the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) which launched an investigation into issues associated with patenting artificial intelligence inventions. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. In addition, the U.S.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor Invention Copyright 52