This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In our new paper, The Truth About DesignPatents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. designpatents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of designpatents: Half of all designpatent applications are rejected. Acquiring DesignPatents.
Intended to offer a thorough introduction to European IP law, the course will be covering key topics like: EU and international legal framework Trade marks and designs, including the EU design reform Geographical indications, including for handicraft products Copyright and the digital age Patentlaw, SPCs, the Unified Patent Court and patentlitigation (..)
20-891 (CVSG requested May 3, 2021); Res Judicata and the Patent-Specific Kessler Doctrine : PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. 20-1394 (CVSG requested October 4, 2021); Undermining Jury Decisions : Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. The parties settled the litigation before the IPRs were complete, but agreed that the IPRs could continue.
Sources say updates to the Chinese PatentLaw regarding designpatents are likely to bring in a wave of new filings, and a surge in litigation along with it
Do defendants and the court have the right to ask who is funding a particular patentlitigation? The party must identify the third-party funder and whether the third-party funder has the right to approve litigation or settlement decisions. The issue arose as a result of two standing orders issued by Judge Connolly.
On June 1, 2021, the Fourth Amendment to the Chinese PatentLaw became effective. An important part of the amendment is the introduction by Article 76 of the patent linkage system in China – a system for litigation of drug patents prior to market entry of generics, similar to that provided by the Hatch Waxman Act in the US.
At its core, 3-D printing uses computer code in a computer-aided design (CAD) file to instruct specially designed printers to print three-dimensional physical objects one layer at a time. The functionalities and any new and unobvious structures created by 3-D printing technologies may be the subject of a utility or a designpatent.
In May, the Federal Circuit eliminated the long-standing test for designpatent obviousness. In its place, the Federal Circuit emphasized a flexible approach to the designpatent obviousness analysis, grounded in the Graham factors.1 1 This is a big change in designpatentlaw.
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patentlaw petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. Mangrove Partners Master Fund (No.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Monday, January 13, issued a precedential decision denying a state law conversion claim as being preempted by patentlaw and rejecting BearBox LLC owner Austin Storms bid to be named a sole or joint inventor on Lancium LLCs patent.
Applicants, for their part, are not required to disclose prior art that is not material to patentability or that is cumulative of other prior art they’ve already provided. It may surprise you, then, to learn that the genre of science fiction is deeply indebted to patentlaw and patent theory. See [link].
founded in 1993 is a full service Intellectual Property firm manned with professionals in and specializes in the practice of Intellectual Property Laws including Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Copyright, Trade secrets. Majumdar & Co.,
Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. A few non-patent IP cases pending before the Supreme Court of some interest: Unicolors, Inc. 20-915 (referral of copyright litigation issues to copyright office) (this is the only one granted certiorari, oral arguments set for November 8, 2021); Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sasso , No.
As Professor Crouch has noted , the Federal Circuit has granted rehearing en banc in the designpatent case of LKQ v. In support of LKQ’s petition for rehearing, some of my friends and colleagues submitted an amicus brief wherein they argued against what they called “designpatent doctrinal exceptionalism.”
The Deepsouth case was about patented equipment for deveining shrimp in order to render them “more pleasing to the fastidious as well as more palatable.” Deepsouth litigated its case to the Supreme Court, and the Court eventually allowed the company to escape some portion of its adjudged liability based upon the territorial limits of U.S.
Patents can protect how things look as well as how they work. If you want to protect how something works, you need a Utility Patent. If you want to protect how something looks, you need a DesignPatent. Design and Utility Patents. Utility patent examination in the U.S. Form versus Function.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. The design must be a design for a specific article; it cannot exist independently of the article.
by Dennis Crouch In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed several key issues in intellectual property litigation, including the scope of "absolute litigation privilege" under Illinois law, trade dress functionality, and the consequences of discovery sanctions. To continue reading, become a Patently-O member.
Late last week, more than half a dozen amicus briefs were filed in support of GM Global Technology Operations in a case that is set to potentially shake up designpatentlaw. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to keep the law as is in order to avoid major disruptions.
government since 1863 (the “Lincoln Law”) and is designed as a mechanism for catching (and thus deterring) fraud against the Federal Government. The law incentivizes whistleblowing — non-governmental folks (known as “qui tam relators”) can file the action on behalf of the U.S.
Lemley and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette of Stanford Law School. Two of the most controversial patentlaw changes of the past year have involved obviousness-type double patenting, which allows applicants to patent obvious variants of their earlier patents by disclaiming the extra term of the later-expiring patent.
Accredited European PatentLitigation Certificate Course Trier & Online tutorial - Course start: 25 September 2024; Course end: 16 May 2025 ERA will offer a high-standard course giving patent attorneys the best tools to understand the legal framework and procedural rules necessary to litigate before the UPC.
Although a patent can be challenged in federal district court, an IPR is an expedited and less costly procedure than federal court litigation. Thus, an IPR is a useful method for a defendant in a patentlitigation lawsuit to invalidate the patent in issue.
On June 1, 2021, the Fourth Amendment to the Chinese PatentLaw became effective. An important part of the amendment is the introduction by Article 76 of the patent linkage system in China – a system for litigation of drug patents prior to market entry of generics, similar to that provided by the Hatch Waxman Act in the US.
Setting aside issues of statutory interpretation, Abbott’s proposal (and hence the Thaler litigation) rests on two prongs, both deeply flawed. One question that has recently been in the headlines around the world, thanks to the Artificial Inventor Project, is whether or not an AI system can be regarded as an inventor.
Anna Maria deals with issues relating to trade marks, patents, designs, trade secrets, copyright and antitrust – both in and out of the courts. She likes to work in international environments, especially cross-border and multi-jurisdictional litigation. Marcel enjoys litigation, in particular.
We recently came across one such short paper on “ SEP Litigations & Issues in Determining the FRAND License ” published in the September 2023 issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (see here ) and extended a guest post invitation to its authors to discuss their key arguments.
285, determining plaintiff’s litigation positions were not baseless even after a granting of summary judgment of noninfringement that “was not a close call.” . As way of background, in patent infringement cases, Courts are authorized to award “reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party” in “exceptional cases.”
First up was the now-traditional EU and US Case Law Update presented by Jan Bernd Nordemann ( Nordemann ) and Vanessa Bailey ( Head of Patent Policy, Amazon ) that took the early morning attendees on a roller coaster ride of recent American and European trade mark, design, copyright and patent case-law.
The Spanish government has approved a draft bill to reform the three main industrial property laws: the Trademark Law, the Industrial DesignLaw and the PatentLaw. Trademark Law. Industrial DesignLaw.
Olaf Sööt Design’s pending petition for certiorari centers on the age-old division between issues-of-fact and issues-of-law. Constitution generally requires due process, and particularly protects litigants’ rights to a jury trial in common law cases. PatentLaw at the Supreme Court December 2021.
It turns out AI has incredible potential to serve as a primary guardian of patents. A Decade of Decline in PatentLitigationPatentlitigation has been declining in the United States, with the number of new patent lawsuits in 2023 dropping 24% from 2022. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
It was dedicated to the best and worst copyright and design cases of the past 20 years. The US litigation in Blurred Lines is the worst copyright case of the past years in her view. After the opening part and the keynote speech, which Eleonora has covered here , our celebratory event continued with the first panel.
Recently, Yuri Eliezer was invited to share his insights on the Conscious Design Podcast , hosted by Ian Peterman. This podcast brings together thought leaders from various fields to discuss the future of design and its impact on our world. AI language models can master these concepts and improve the efficiency of legal practice.
Par had listed two patents in the Orange Book as covering its product and so, as required, Eagle’s ANDA included a Paragraph IV certification that the two patents were either (1) invalid or (2) would not be infringed. We have the ANDA filing, but there are always substantial design choices before final release.
It then goes on to consider the various international treaties and finishes with a closer look at the particular issues that can arise when obtaining or litigating the relevant right in Europe. It asks why this right is necessary and how protection has evolved in a European context. The treaty section is particularly clear.
On the proposed amendments to the Patent Act, inter alia she argues against dilution of the criminal penalties for non- compliance with patent working requirements, highlighting the importance of the “working” requirements within the patent regime of the country. Case Summaries.
David Tropp sued Travel Sentry for patent infringement back in 2006. That was the same year that I first taught a patentlaw class. Back then, eligibility was almost an unknown concept in patentlitigation. The rule of thumb was “anything under the sun, made by man,” and I mean ANYTHING.
HBL argued that, based on the parties’ communications, Lite-Netics should have known early on that there was no infringement (consistent with the analysis performed by the district court, which also found that the accused designs didn’t infringe). The litigation privilege did not extend to making baseless claims about infringement.
In this post , Rahul Bajaj and Praharsh Gour analayse the underutilisation of Indian patentlaw’s robust flexibilities to promote patient interest. They conclude that judicially nudged use of patentlaw levers is critical for the deployment of flexibilities in our patentlaw for TB patients who desperately need access to these drugs.
In the USA, civil litigation typically involves substantial discovery — with each party demanding to see the other side’s secrets. In patentlaw, these secrets are often at the core of the business process: product development and manufacturing processes, key product details, detailed market and sales data, etc.
The Spanish government has approved a draft bill to reform the three main industrial property laws: the Trademark Law, the Industrial DesignLaw and the PatentLaw. Trademark Law. Industrial DesignLaw.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content