This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2024 was a year of both big leaps and incremental advances in designlaw and practice globally. Years-long efforts came to fruition in the European Union and internationally with the DesignLaw Treaty, adopting significant advances and heralding greater global harmonization.
Republished by Blog Post PromoterVia the Diva of DesignLaw, Sarah Burstein: This is a good example of how trade dress provides broader protection than designpatents.
Recent patent cases have made it more difficult to obtain utility patent protection for some of the functional aspects of computer software. Strategic use of designpatents can be an important part of an overall patent strategy. Strategic use of designpatents can be an important part of an overall patent strategy.
In his recent work published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice , Dr. Mo Abolkheir argues that the prevailing interpretation of ‘inventive steps’ places emphasis on the inventor’s imaginative capacity rather than the invention itself. student at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru.
Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a DesignLaw Treaty – Plenary Sessions. Kartikeya is a second-year law student in the LL.B. Having freelanced as a patent research analyst, he developed an interest in patent prosecution and in exploring the Patents Act through various interpretative approaches.
In 2007, I began attending sessions of the World Intellectual Property Organizations (WIPOs) Standing Committee on Trademarks, Industrial Designs, and Geographical Indications (SCT) in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the development of the DesignLaw Treaty.
Among the cauldron of Halloween patents, one particularly clever design stands out: a patented method for decorating pumpkins (and, technically, other fruits…but we’re not holding our breath for Halloween coconuts). Patent 6,855,224, an invention that makes it easy to transfer intricate designs onto pumpkin surfaces.
As we predicted in our 2023 report, 2024 was a banner year for design rights in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) agreed to consider en banc whether the long-standing designpatent obviousness test required modification. and elsewhere. In last years report, we noted that the U.S. While the new.
Federal Circuit and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) reshaping the landscape of designpatentlaw. These updates reflect a broader trend towards more flexible and inclusive IP protection, ensuring that innovators can better safeguard their relative designs. By: Bennett Jones LLP
In a second of a series on AI and patents from our KatFriends at GJE, Kate Voller reports on a recent CIPA webinar with the EPO on how the EPO is leveraging AI tools in examination - with the key message of "assisting", not "replacing" examiners. The AmeriKat has the t-shirt.now what?
International Trade Commission (ITC) remains a pivotal forum for addressing intellectual property disputes under Section 337, particularly those involving designpatents.
Inox India Limited and Others , Aditya Bhargava discusses the jurisprudence on the difference between copyright and industrial designs and the two-pronged test to distinguish between the two intellectual properties adopted by the Court in this case. Aditya is a third-year law student at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
The majority of 2024 was a quiet year for designpatent cases at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The court issued five opinions involving U.S. Below we discuss the two substantive cases: LKQ Corporation v.
Evo’s designpatent claims an “ ornamental design for a foldable bag ” as shown in the figures above. district court held the patent invalid as both functional and obvious; and also not infringed. Functionality : Designpatents focus on ornamentality rather than utility. by Dennis Crouch.
February 6, 2025 Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC (EMP&A), a leading trademark law firm dedicated to protecting brands, is proud to announce the successful registration of U.S. The newly patented software enhances efficiency, accuracy, and client service by automating key aspects of the trademark management process.
Aditya is a third-year law student at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Part II] Cryogas Judgment: Supreme Court Stops Copyright from Gaslighting Design By Aditya Bhargava In the first part of the post, I looked at how jurisprudence has evolved from the Microfibres case in 2006 up to the present case in Cryogas.
When there are fewer design elements in a design claim or when the individual elements of the design seem commonplace in isolation, it can be easy to overlook the inventive effort that went into developing a design. By: Quarles & Brady LLP
Kilpatrick partners Megan Bussey, Nicki Kennedy, and Michael Bertelson recently presented at the 20th annual KTIPS (Kilpatrick Townsend Intellectual Property Seminar) on the topic of “A New Era Dawns for DesignPatent Validity - How the Federal Circuit Has Rewritten DesignPatent Obviousness Law.” designpatents.
In 2024, designpatentlaw encountered a couple of major changes: the implementation of a new designpatent bar, and the upending of decades of obviousness law under 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)s decision in LKQ Corporation v.
Inter partes activity involving designpatents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was relatively low in 2024. The PTAB rendered just two inter partes decisions involving designpatents: Next Step Group, Inc. Deckers Outdoor Corp., IPR2024-00525, Paper 16 (PTAB Aug. 6, 2024) and Hangzhou Taihe Trading v.
A European Patent Office (EPO) opposition is often the first line of defense for a party seeking to invalidate a European patent. Oppositions must be filed within nine months of the patents grant, and they offer a centralized way to revoke or limit the patent in all designated states.
One of the main areas of intellectual property law development is the link between artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights (IPRs). Growing AI-related business activity, early case law, and legislative and international policy activities are making it more and more relevant in practice.
by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of designpatents. Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate designpatent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § GM Global Tech. Operations LLC , No.
Trier in summer As readers know, the Katfriends at the Academy of European Law (ERA) in Trier are always busy organizing programmes and courses on all aspects of European law, including IP and digital and IT law. For those looking to get a deep dive in either subject, ERA is organizing two distinct summer courses this year.
by Dennis Crouch The USPTO is officially establishing a separate designpatent practitioner bar with its final rule published on November 16, 2023 and effective January 2, 2024. Currently, a single patent bar governs registration for anyone seeking to practice before the USPTO in utility, plant, and designpatent matters.
GM decision, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its examiners providing updated guidance and examination instructions in light of the court’s overturning of the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for determining obviousness of designpatents.
Pramudji Law Group PLLC, a Houston-based IP boutique law firm, is seeking a patent agent/patent attorney/patent engineer with a degree in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, or Physics. This position entails drafting and prosecuting patent applications and performing invalidity and infringement analysis.
This is the question the European Parliament addresses for the first time in its Resolution on policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company commercial and intellectual property law issues, published on October 17, 2024, in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a notice with supplemental guidance for its staff members examining designpatent claims that include computer-generated images. By: AEON Law
GM Global Technology Operations LLC, overturning the long-standing obviousness test for designpatents. On May 21, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision (full court, instead of the typical three-judge panel) in LKQ Corp. By: Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In recent years, AI patent activity has exponentially increased. The figure below shows the volume of public AI patent applications categorized by AI component in the U.S. AI patent activities by year. Inventors and patent attorneys often face the challenge of effectively protecting new AI technology development.
Intellectual property law groups and Apple Inc. Patent and Trademark Office allow designpatents on computer icons shown using new technologies like holograms and augmented reality, saying a rule limiting protection to images on display screens is outdated. have recommended that the U.S.
This CLE webinar will guide patent counsel on the Federal Circuit's recent decision in LKQ Corp. May 21, 2024) and its implications for designpatents. The panel will discuss the new test for obviousness and what hurdles it will present for designpatents. GM Global Technology Operations L.L.C.
Pramudji Law Group PLLC, a Houston-based IP boutique law firm, is seeking a patent agent/patent attorney/patent engineer with a degree in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, or Physics. This position entails drafting and prosecuting patent applications and performing invalidity and infringement analysis.
On May 21, 2024, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc opinion overruling the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for obviousness of designpatents in favor of the analytical framework used for utility patents outlined in Graham v. John Deere Co. and KSR Int’l Co. Teleflex Inc. LKQ Corporation et al.
Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to ask a judge to force Google to sell Chrome in an ongoing legal case accusing Google of monopolistic practices; WIPO member states adopt the Riyadh DesignLaw Treaty; and the U.S.
The full Federal Circuit on Tuesday overruled long-standing tests for proving that designpatents are invalid as obvious, finding that the rules are "improperly rigid" and holding that the obviousness test for utility patents should be used instead.
The Federal Circuit's decision discarding long-standing tests for proving that a designpatent is invalid as obvious means the world has changed for patent examiners and applicants, attorneys said, and the new standard could lead to more designpatent applications being turned down.
Delegates from the world's major intellectual property groups signed a treaty Friday that would, if approved, establish new rules to facilitate the filing of designpatents.
INTRODUCTION Patent legislation offers legal safeguarding for novel inventions once they have been patented by their creators. A patent , essentially a temporary monopoly, is bestowed upon the owner in exchange for disclosing the invention to the public. This system benefits both society and the inventor.
Controller of Patents and Designs , came down heavily on the IPO for its shoddy order rejecting the patent application filed by the appellant. The judgment raises serious concerns regarding the quality of functioning of the patent office. Order The Patent Controller issued a cryptic order rejecting the patent application.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content