LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2024

The Guidance, for USPTO examiners and applicants, addresses inventorship and the use of AI, including generative AI, in the inventive process. The Guidance provides illustrative examples in which AI systems play different roles in the inventive process, to show how the USPTO will analyze inventorship issues.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 6, 2022

In one of them, LKQ asked the court to rule that the current primary reference requirement for design patent obviousness, as stated in In re Rosen and Durling v. The panel did not seem convinced that it had the authority to overrule those prior panel decisions and at least one judge expressed doubt that KSR even applies to designs.

Designs 54

Designs Design Design Patent Art 54

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 23, 2021

Obviousness of a design patent is governed by 35 U.S.C. Importantly, the Federal Circuit suggests that the obviousness inquiry should begin with a primary reference whose whose “design characteristics … are basically the same as the claimed design” and that creates “basically the same visual impression.” Samsung (Fed.

Design Patent 89

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 89

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

Design patents and utility patents are two different things. Design patents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. Utility patents protect four categories of functional inventions: machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, and processes (methods).

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 52

Patent Trademark Blog

DECEMBER 12, 2022

What is the filing deadline for a US design patent based on a foreign priority application? A US design patent application must be filed within six months of your foreign priority date. What is the cost to file a US design patent application with a priority claim? any known prior art references material to patentability.

Design Patent 98

Design Patent Designs Design Patent Application 98

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. With the advances in AI technologies, AI systems create drugs, treatments, designs, and more. That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system. Stephen L.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Patently-O

MARCH 26, 2024

Teva references the landmark Supreme Court case of Atlantic Works v. Brady for an improved dredge boat design. The Supreme Court ultimately reversed the lower court’s decision upholding the patent and found instead that Brady’s claimed invention lacked novelty and did not constitute a patentable advance over the prior art.

Invention 57

Invention Art Patent Designs 57

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] The Guidance strives to ensure balance between protecting and incentivizing AI-assisted inventions and not hindering future human innovation, as “the patent system is designed to encourage human ingenuity.” [2]

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

SpicyIP

JUNE 25, 2024

Astral Design Infringement Case By Aarav Gupta The High Court of Bombay issued an ad-interim injunction in the design infringement complaint filed by Pidilite Industries Limited (“Pidilite”) against Astral Limited, on the 13th of June, 2024. How are Competing Designs Assessed?

Designs 45

Designs Design Patent Application Copying 45

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

In particular, in this divisional patent Regeneron had attempted to avoid a novelty attack by explicitly disclaiming embodiments of the invention from the claim. Legal background: Undisclosed disclaimers Patent claims generally define the essential features present in the claimed invention.

Invention 70

Invention Art Patent Law 70

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 14, 2023

the case addresses the weight the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) should give to the intended purpose of a primary reference when evaluating a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art’s (POSITA) motivation to combine that primary reference with secondary references. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L. , The opinion provides Fig.

Designs 147

Designs Design Invention Patent 147

The IPKat

JULY 22, 2022

On 21 July 2022, Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) approved the convening of diplomatic conferences on designs and genetic resources, no later than 2024. This is referred to as a proposed new ‘patent disclosure requirement’. plants, animals, and microorganisms), and knowledge systems.

Designs 114

Designs Design Intellectual Property Licensing 114

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 24, 2023

1] LKQ, an auto parts repair vendor for GM, successfully petitioned for inter partes review of GM’s design patent for a front fender design, [2] arguing it was anticipated by a prior art reference (Lain) and obvious over Lian alone or in combination with a brochure for the 2010 Hyundai Tucson. Operations LLC. [1]

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 52

Patently-O

APRIL 20, 2024

by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running design patent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Columbia’s design patent claims an “ornamental design of a heat reflective material” as shown in the figures. Federal Circuit’s 2023 Decision. Patent D657,093. Swisa, Inc. ,

Design Patent 67

Design Patent Art Designs Design 67

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

By Kevin Preji On 28th Feb, 2024, the Delhi High Court in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in allowing an appeal, clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (‘PSITA’) in determining non-obviousness. The patent office issued a first examination report in June 2019, (7 years later!)

Invention 111

Invention Art Designs Design 111

Patently-O

JULY 18, 2024

The court found the claim language itself shows the invention’s focus served the human-organizing purpose of “assist[ing] an investigator in conducting a background investigation,” and the individual claim steps were all focused on information handling at a technically generic level. .” Covalent, Inc. ,

Patent 62

Patent Invention Technology Inventor 62

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. With the advances in AI technologies, AI systems create drugs, treatments, designs, and more. That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system. Stephen L.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 9, 2022

The term “design” has been defined in Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 as the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied on an article that is either two or three dimensional or both. Criteria for design registration.

Registration 52

Registration Designs Design Confidentiality 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

Did the Board err in finding that a POSITA would have had a motivation to combine the cited prior art references to Robinson and Greim? 2) The Board did not err in finding that a POSITA would have had a motivation to combine the cited prior art references to Robinson and Greim. citing In re Wertheim , 541 F.2d 2d 257, 264–65 (C.C.P.A.

Art 130

Art Invention Copying Designs 130

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently published examination guidance and a request for comments on the treatment of inventorship for inventions created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. Rather, the human must provide significant inventive contribution).

Inventor 117

Inventor Invention Patent Application Designs 117

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 9, 2023

Plaintiff had argued that using the patented methods in the design process, which guides the subsequent manufacturing process, is sufficient to state a claim. In other words, Defendant argued that alleging a method is used in the design of a product is distinct from alleging that the method is used in the manufacture of the product.

Designs 98

Designs Design Patent Patent Infringement 98

LexBlog IP

JULY 26, 2022

PatentNext Summary: The Legal Board of Appeal (the “Board”) of the European Patent Office (EPO) recently suggested that the owner of an artificial intelligence (AI) machine could possibly be listed as an inventor of an AI-generated Invention. ” J 8/20 (Designation of inventor/DABAS) at para.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2022

the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s finding that Gamon’s design patents on gravity-fed displays for soup were non-obvious. Campbell comparison of solid-lined portion of claimed design to primary (Linz) reference. In Campbell Soup Co. Gamon Plus, Inc. , 4th 1268 (Fed. 19, 2021) (“ Gamon II ”).

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 10, 2024

If IPR is not understood in technology transfer process, sharing of knowledge and invention faces legal challenges. Further Trademarks Act, 1999 and Designs Act, 2000 allow licensing of trademarks and designs respectively. Before the knowledge or invention is transferred, the owner must make sure they own rights over it.

Intellectual Property 101

Intellectual Property Technology Licensing Invention 101

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 9, 2022

Someone has referred you here because you’ve said something wrong about the laws related to web scraping in the United States. You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About The First Amendment.” The prior part explained the most recent ruling, a devastating but not unexpected loss for hiQ. Don’t worry! You’re not alone.

Blogging 118

Blogging Law Contracts Cease and Desist 118

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 6, 2021

A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for design patent applications. SurgiSil design – “Limp Implant”. Therefore, since the applied prior art reference discloses a design for an art tool—i.e., 2020-1940 (Oct. Active Mfg.

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent Law 52

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 20, 2023

Reengineering of the Requirement of Disclosure of Foreign Applications by the 2019 Patent Manual – on the requirement to disclose the corresponding foreign patent applications. Part II: Diagnostic method patents in India – on prohibition to patent diagnostic methods.

Patent Application 64

Patent Application Designs Design Invention 64

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 27, 2024

.” Before Graham and the 1952 Act, the courts had ground their obviousness analysis in the statutory requirement of “invention” and the Constitutional purpose to “promote the Progress.” The guidelines do not reference the US Constitution or any other Supreme Court cases besides Graham and KSR. .”

Art 120

Art Invention Patent Application Patent 120

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 9, 2023

Image by pvproductions on Freepik A gentle reminder to our readers that the last day to submit comments for the revision of the Patent, Designs, Trademark, GI and Copyright Manuals and Guidelines is just around the corner. As discussed earlier , CGPDTM has invited comments from the interested stakeholders by October 15, 2023.

Patent Application 69

Patent Application Invention Designs Design 69

Patent Trademark Blog

JANUARY 18, 2023

What makes an invention eligible for patent protection? Subject matter eligibility refers to whether an invention is qualified for patent protection. An invention must still overcome the hurdle of uniqueness which includes novelty and non-obviousness. 35 USC 101 – Inventions patentable. What is Section 101?

Patent Application 98

Patent Application Invention Graphic Design Design Patent 98

The IPKat

APRIL 2, 2024

The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step. The German courts have been referring to 'artistic freedom,' rather than following the terminology from the CJEU case law, which refers to the distinct concept of 'creative freedom.' We will await the judgment from the CJEU.

Intellectual Property 56

Intellectual Property Social Media Invention Copyright 56

IP Watchdog

DECEMBER 6, 2023

10, 2023), a key issue in inter partes reviews: how to establish a reference patent as prior art based on the filing date of an earlier-filed application, such as a provisional. 2015), do not apply for post-America Invents Act (AIA) patents. Rapidpulse, Inc., IPR2021-01466, Paper 34 (Mar. Nat’l Graphics, Inc., 3d 1375 (Fed.

Art 52

Art Patent Invention Designs 52

Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

References must be sufficiently accessible, clear, and enabling to serve as legitimate evidence of what was previously known. Many of us learned a mantra that “a prior art reference is only good for what it discloses” — but in our expanding world of deep fakes, intentional and otherwise, is face value still worth much?

Art 109

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 109

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

Vanda sued, but lost on obviousness grounds — with the court holding that the claimed combination was obvious because it was directed to a set of known elements and a person of ordinary skill would have a “reasonable expectation of success” in reaching the resulting invention. NAPP Amicus Brief. Greenwood , 52 U.S. (11

Invention 89

Invention Art Patent Designs 89

LexBlog IP

MARCH 9, 2023

Plaintiff had argued that using the patented methods in the design process, which guides the subsequent manufacturing process, is sufficient to state a claim. In other words, Defendant argued that alleging a method is used in the design of a product is distinct from alleging that the method is used in the manufacture of the product.

Designs 52

Designs Design Patent Patent Infringement 52

Patently-O

MARCH 28, 2024

The court’s ruling emphasizes that the mere existence of prior art elements is not sufficient to render a claimed invention obvious; rather, there must be a clear reason or rationale for a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine those elements in the claimed manner. Assembly Guidance Systems, Inc. In KSR Int’l Co.

Art 57

Art Invention Patent Patent Law 57