This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Socialmedia (aka Facebook) were not a part of the conversation. This raises the question: does the press publishers’ right apply to socialmedia? While socialmedia were not explicitly singled out, they seem to comfortably fall within the ISSP definition. Do socialmedia make content available?
The court’s ruling raises interesting, but troubling, questions about any government actor’s ability to enable reader comments on socialmedia. but the State Police cannot “block Tanner from participating in its designated public forum based on his profane private messages.” Implications.
Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Today, I’m covering AB 2408, a performative “protect kids online” bill that kick kids off socialmedia entirely and ruin the Internet for adults too. This will be a major shock to millions of Californians who value and enjoy socialmedia.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. The dispute is between bridalwear designer Hayley Paige Gutman and JLM Couture, a bridalwear company. The court discusses two socialmedia accounts: Instagram.com/misshayleypaige and pinterest.com/misshayleypaige/_saved/. The court also found “Ms.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Today’s post focuses on the socialmedia defendants’ efforts to dismiss the parallel lawsuits by the school districts.
1: Sony Music Ends Copyright Fight with Gymshark Over SocialMedia Posts. First off today, Blake Brittain at Reuters reports that Sony Music and UK fitness apparel brand Gymshark have settled their lawsuit over Gymshark’s alleged use of Sony’s music in socialmedia posts. However, the U.S.
This is the latest entry in a long-running legal battle between Hayley Paige Gutman, a bridalwear designer, and JLM Couture, her one-time employer. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). On appeal, the Second Circuit vacates the account transfers to JLM. ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The trouble began when Albany radio station WGNA asked its socialmedia followers to vote for the regions best fried chicken and tagged a few contenders, including Chicken Joes, which retweeted the stations original post. Chicken Joes delivers a piping hot reality check on the risks of playing copyright roulette. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Thus, it would compel those platforms to disseminate anything and everything with a “viewpoint,” including pro-Nazi speech, medical misinformation, terrorist propaganda, and foreign government disinformation. This kind of argumentation is how a government actor disingenuously repackages censorship. Amicus Briefs. Text of HB 20.
That decision could have significant implications for this case as well as all other First Amendment challenges of states’ efforts to censor socialmedia.] The analogy is an imperfect one—socialmedia operators are arguably less involved in the curation of their websites’ content than these traditional examples.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
This recent decision from the Supreme Court case grapples with the issue of when a public official’s socialmedia activity constitutes state action for purposes of a First Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. I’ve been following the case as part of my work on internet and media law issues. by Dennis Crouch Lindke v.
Earlier this year, the Texas legislature enacted HB 20 , a blatant attempt to censor socialmedia service. The opinion emphatically slices through the FUD that’s been generated by pro-censorial forces questioning whether socialmedia services exercise editorial discretion. The Opinion. ” [cite to USTA v.
They go as far as to call for people to change their mindset about socialmedia before making the jump. The basic idea behind Mastodon is to create a decentralized social networking platform that no one entity control. Have a Designated Agent to Receive Notices of Copyright Infringement. Some Mastodon Basics.
government passed the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2020 (CASE Act). The website features information about the CCB, updates on the process, and users can register a CCB Designated Service Agent to receive notices and communication from the CCB. This includes works originally uploaded to socialmedia.
Other Posts Curing the Rare: Government Issues Tender to Acquire 17 Patented Rare Disease Medicines The threshold for procuring 127 medicines, including drugs for rare diseases, was raised by the Ministry of Finance in its August 9 circular. Government invites comments on the draft Commercial Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2024.
With Bill C-11 in the final stretch – Senate approval could come this week – the government finally provided a more detailed explanation for rejecting the Senate’s user content regulation fix. It is sad that as the bill nears passage, the government doesn’t seem to understand or misleads on the impact of its own legislation.
Introduction What separates long-established print and electronic media from socialmedia is that it comes along with a bunch of techniques for its usage. These are tools that shaped socialmedia to be more significant than the long-established medias.
Despite repeated assurances from the government that “users are out, platforms are in”, the reality is that the bill kept the door open to regulating such content. ii) is required to be registered with the Commission but does not provide a socialmedia service. The language in the bill is clear: Section 4.2
In doing so, it eviscerates the claim that there is a tangible connection between the requirement to pay for the value of news articles on socialmedia and search platforms (called digital news intermediaries or DNI’s in the bill). Millions of Canadians choose to access media through search and socialmedia.
The government has yet to release its final regulations for the Online News Act , but recent comments from News Media Canada seemed to suggest that it is hoping to find common ground with Google , stating that it supports the company’s proposed amendments to Bill C-18 draft regulations.
For those new to the bill, the government has called it “fundamentally flawed” since it contemplates measures that raise privacy concerns through mandated age verification technologies, website blocking, and extends far beyond pornography sites to include search and socialmedia.
A human inventor serves as the central figure in the design of the patent system. The selection and evaluation of the previous art are aided further by the appropriately designated relevant art. DESIGNS Artificial Intelligence is also capable of creating designs on its own, akin to the inventions made.
The California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC / AB2273, just signed by Gov. The idea is that society benefits from more, and better, innovation if innovators don’t need the government’s approval. This is unfortunate because those bills can harbor ill-advised policy ideas. Newsom ) is an example of such a bill.
We’re pleased to inform you that the Centre for Communication Governance at the National Law University Delhi is inviting applications for various research positions. About the Centre for Communication Governance. For further details, please see the announcement below. Call for Applications: Research Positions at CCG.
According to their filing, the section of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) that governs such subpoenas doesn’t just apply to web hosts, but also to internet service providers like Centurylink. 3: Australian Government Buys Copyright to Aboriginal Flag in $20m Deal. The flag was designed in 1971 by artist Harold Thomas.
But given a bill that envisions government-backed censorship, mandates age verification to use search engines or socialmedia sites, and creates a framework for court-ordered website blocking, there is a need to pay attention. The bill, which is the brainchild of Senator Julie Miville-Duchêne , is not a government bill.
Its AI is designed to detect and prevent crimes. Clearview’s AI crawls the internet and can access, download, and store any image uploaded to socialmedia. Many socialmedia companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, have accused Clearview of utilizing user images without authorization.
However, because of state sovereign immunity, it’s technically not possible to sue a state government or any of their components in a federal court. According to Unicolors, the retailers infringed on one of their designs and sold various goods with it. Under the current law, all copyright matters are federal.
7) Governments loot Google and Facebook under the pretense of “saving” journalism. The term “link taxes” refer to the government compulsion of large Internet services, such as socialmedia or search engines, to pay news media for indexing and publishing their headlines and links.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
On September 18, 2023, NetChoice, LLC — a national trade association with members from the tech and socialmedia industry — obtained a preliminary injunction from the District Court for the Northern District of California preventing the State of California from enforcing the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“AADC” or the “Act”).
1), which the government removed from Bill C-10 but has re-inserted in C-11, creates an exception for programs on socialmedia services (ie. Note that this presumes that all audio-visual content posted to a socialmedia service is a program subject to regulation, with the exception is designed to exclude some of that content.
He dismissed American’s claims for breach of user agreement, conditions of carriage (the rules governing air travel), and tortious interference with contract, ruling they were barred by the statute of limitations. Let me know in the comments below or @copyrightlately on socialmedia.
Recently, Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Zydus against socialmedia influencer Prashant Desai’s allegedly disparaging post on nutritional health drinks. SpicyIP Intern Manya Gupta analysis the Court’s rationale on disparagement and assesses the implication of this order on free speech.
When installed on a car, they suppress or bypass emission controls designed to protect the environment. The US government brought a civil lawsuit against the defendants for 203 violations. The US government brought a civil lawsuit against the defendants for 203 violations. It doesn’t work. Publication of Third-Party Content.
Other Posts SpicyIP Tidbit: Delhi Police Authorized to Issue Takedown Orders for Unlawful Content On 26th December 2024, the Delhi Government issued a gazette notification, designating Delhi Police as the nodal agency for regulating digital content hosted or published on intermediary platforms in the National Capital Territory of Delhi.
My post on the issue walks through the proposed legislation, noting the “CRTC is empowered to create regulations applicable to user content uploaded to socialmedia services as programs” and focusing specifically on the discoverability rules and their implications.
After years of delay, the government tabled Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act , earlier today. My immediate response to the government materials was that the bill is significantly different from the 2021 consultation and that many of the worst fears – borne from years of poorly thought out digital policy – have not been realized.
I open by noting that the Canadian government’s efforts to regulate big tech companies sometimes feels like a series of high-stakes poker matches in which the government foolishly bets that readily apparent risks can be ignored. government. government threat is just a bluff. government threat is just a bluff.
In an injunction application dated December 2, 2021, Nintendo requested a website blocking order under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. It targeted six major ISPs (BT, EE, Plusnet, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media) demanding that they block subscriber access to five domains carrying NSW2U and NSWROM branding.
What it does, however, is open the door to collaboration with intermediaries, governments, and law enforcement agencies in other countries. Collaborating with Governments and Law Enforcement. The same strategy applies to governments and law enforcement. And governments are beginning to listen,” Van Voorn notes.
A little under two years ago, the federal government shut down Gears-branded IPTV services operated by Bill Omar Carrasquillo (aka Omi in a Hellcat). As the government works to take possession of those assets in a civil process, the long-awaited criminal indictment has now landed. IRS and FBI agents seized “at least” $5.2m
How the AADC Came to Be With a growing number of children using the Internet, and the rising number of hours children spend online, federal and state governments try to protect these children from the harms of Internet use, by limiting the collection and use of their data as well as by limiting the content to which the minors are exposed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content