This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The court’s ruling raises interesting, but troubling, questions about any government actor’s ability to enable reader comments on socialmedia. but the State Police cannot “block Tanner from participating in its designated public forum based on his profane private messages.” Implications.
Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Today, I’m covering AB 2408, a performative “protect kids online” bill that kick kids off socialmedia entirely and ruin the Internet for adults too. This will be a major shock to millions of Californians who value and enjoy socialmedia.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. The dispute is between bridalwear designer Hayley Paige Gutman and JLM Couture, a bridalwear company. The court discusses two socialmedia accounts: Instagram.com/misshayleypaige and pinterest.com/misshayleypaige/_saved/. The court also found “Ms.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Today’s post focuses on the socialmedia defendants’ efforts to dismiss the parallel lawsuits by the school districts.
1: Sony Music Ends Copyright Fight with Gymshark Over SocialMedia Posts. First off today, Blake Brittain at Reuters reports that Sony Music and UK fitness apparel brand Gymshark have settled their lawsuit over Gymshark’s alleged use of Sony’s music in socialmedia posts. However, the U.S.
This is the latest entry in a long-running legal battle between Hayley Paige Gutman, a bridalwear designer, and JLM Couture, her one-time employer. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). On appeal, the Second Circuit vacates the account transfers to JLM. ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The trouble began when Albany radio station WGNA asked its socialmedia followers to vote for the regions best fried chicken and tagged a few contenders, including Chicken Joes, which retweeted the stations original post. Chicken Joes delivers a piping hot reality check on the risks of playing copyright roulette. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Thus, it would compel those platforms to disseminate anything and everything with a “viewpoint,” including pro-Nazi speech, medical misinformation, terrorist propaganda, and foreign government disinformation. This kind of argumentation is how a government actor disingenuously repackages censorship. Amicus Briefs. Text of HB 20.
That decision could have significant implications for this case as well as all other First Amendment challenges of states’ efforts to censor socialmedia.] The analogy is an imperfect one—socialmedia operators are arguably less involved in the curation of their websites’ content than these traditional examples.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
This recent decision from the Supreme Court case grapples with the issue of when a public official’s socialmedia activity constitutes state action for purposes of a First Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. I’ve been following the case as part of my work on internet and media law issues. by Dennis Crouch Lindke v.
Earlier this year, the Texas legislature enacted HB 20 , a blatant attempt to censor socialmedia service. The opinion emphatically slices through the FUD that’s been generated by pro-censorial forces questioning whether socialmedia services exercise editorial discretion. The Opinion. ” [cite to USTA v.
They go as far as to call for people to change their mindset about socialmedia before making the jump. The basic idea behind Mastodon is to create a decentralized social networking platform that no one entity control. Have a Designated Agent to Receive Notices of Copyright Infringement. Some Mastodon Basics.
government passed the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2020 (CASE Act). The website features information about the CCB, updates on the process, and users can register a CCB Designated Service Agent to receive notices and communication from the CCB. This includes works originally uploaded to socialmedia.
Other Posts Curing the Rare: Government Issues Tender to Acquire 17 Patented Rare Disease Medicines The threshold for procuring 127 medicines, including drugs for rare diseases, was raised by the Ministry of Finance in its August 9 circular. Government invites comments on the draft Commercial Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2024.
With Bill C-11 in the final stretch – Senate approval could come this week – the government finally provided a more detailed explanation for rejecting the Senate’s user content regulation fix. It is sad that as the bill nears passage, the government doesn’t seem to understand or misleads on the impact of its own legislation.
Introduction What separates long-established print and electronic media from socialmedia is that it comes along with a bunch of techniques for its usage. These are tools that shaped socialmedia to be more significant than the long-established medias.
Despite repeated assurances from the government that “users are out, platforms are in”, the reality is that the bill kept the door open to regulating such content. ii) is required to be registered with the Commission but does not provide a socialmedia service. The language in the bill is clear: Section 4.2
In doing so, it eviscerates the claim that there is a tangible connection between the requirement to pay for the value of news articles on socialmedia and search platforms (called digital news intermediaries or DNI’s in the bill). Millions of Canadians choose to access media through search and socialmedia.
For those new to the bill, the government has called it “fundamentally flawed” since it contemplates measures that raise privacy concerns through mandated age verification technologies, website blocking, and extends far beyond pornography sites to include search and socialmedia.
The California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC / AB2273, just signed by Gov. The idea is that society benefits from more, and better, innovation if innovators don’t need the government’s approval. This is unfortunate because those bills can harbor ill-advised policy ideas. Newsom ) is an example of such a bill.
We’re pleased to inform you that the Centre for Communication Governance at the National Law University Delhi is inviting applications for various research positions. About the Centre for Communication Governance. For further details, please see the announcement below. Call for Applications: Research Positions at CCG.
According to their filing, the section of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) that governs such subpoenas doesn’t just apply to web hosts, but also to internet service providers like Centurylink. 3: Australian Government Buys Copyright to Aboriginal Flag in $20m Deal. The flag was designed in 1971 by artist Harold Thomas.
But given a bill that envisions government-backed censorship, mandates age verification to use search engines or socialmedia sites, and creates a framework for court-ordered website blocking, there is a need to pay attention. The bill, which is the brainchild of Senator Julie Miville-Duchêne , is not a government bill.
Its AI is designed to detect and prevent crimes. Clearview’s AI crawls the internet and can access, download, and store any image uploaded to socialmedia. Many socialmedia companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, have accused Clearview of utilizing user images without authorization.
However, because of state sovereign immunity, it’s technically not possible to sue a state government or any of their components in a federal court. According to Unicolors, the retailers infringed on one of their designs and sold various goods with it. Under the current law, all copyright matters are federal.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
When installed on a car, they suppress or bypass emission controls designed to protect the environment. The US government brought a civil lawsuit against the defendants for 203 violations. The US government brought a civil lawsuit against the defendants for 203 violations. It doesn’t work. Publication of Third-Party Content.
On September 18, 2023, NetChoice, LLC — a national trade association with members from the tech and socialmedia industry — obtained a preliminary injunction from the District Court for the Northern District of California preventing the State of California from enforcing the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“AADC” or the “Act”).
He dismissed American’s claims for breach of user agreement, conditions of carriage (the rules governing air travel), and tortious interference with contract, ruling they were barred by the statute of limitations. Let me know in the comments below or @copyrightlately on socialmedia.
Recently, Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Zydus against socialmedia influencer Prashant Desai’s allegedly disparaging post on nutritional health drinks. SpicyIP Intern Manya Gupta analysis the Court’s rationale on disparagement and assesses the implication of this order on free speech.
In an injunction application dated December 2, 2021, Nintendo requested a website blocking order under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. It targeted six major ISPs (BT, EE, Plusnet, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media) demanding that they block subscriber access to five domains carrying NSW2U and NSWROM branding.
What it does, however, is open the door to collaboration with intermediaries, governments, and law enforcement agencies in other countries. Collaborating with Governments and Law Enforcement. The same strategy applies to governments and law enforcement. And governments are beginning to listen,” Van Voorn notes.
A little under two years ago, the federal government shut down Gears-branded IPTV services operated by Bill Omar Carrasquillo (aka Omi in a Hellcat). As the government works to take possession of those assets in a civil process, the long-awaited criminal indictment has now landed. IRS and FBI agents seized “at least” $5.2m
How the AADC Came to Be With a growing number of children using the Internet, and the rising number of hours children spend online, federal and state governments try to protect these children from the harms of Internet use, by limiting the collection and use of their data as well as by limiting the content to which the minors are exposed.
The Canadian government similarly believes that certain links posted by users – namely links to news articles posted on Facebook and Google – create unfair competition since the Internet platforms are competing with Canadian news outlets for the same readers and the same advertisers. negotiated or arbitrated licence).
22, 2021): companies now pay so-called “influencers” to issue posts on socialmedia touting their products or services. Advertising/E-Commerce. Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp., 2021 WL 221878 (9th Cir Jan. Wired : How Covid Gums Up the Court System. * Les Giblin LLC v. La Marque, 2021 WL 1997376 (D. Once again, the Court disagrees.
Union of India The Delhi HC passed a slew of directions to the Union of India including directing the Union Government to allocate 974 crore to the National Fund for Rare Diseases (NFRD). The plaintiff claimed to have adopted the trademarks in 2006, acquired a registered design in 2019, and built significant goodwill for his products.
TPG aggregates and collects information from the most prominent rewards programs and provides a series of rankings and recommendations designed to help maximize your rewards points. AA’s terms and conditions says that all disputes arising under its agreements will be governed by the Northern District of Texas. Thus, the Points Guy.
The site is designed to be user-friendly while remaining resilient to enforcement measures. EPAG Domainservices Government of South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands / Cloudflare libgen.li With no other viable options left, the publishers filed a motion for a default judgment in their favor. Cloudflare libgen.ee Identity Digital Inc.
Comments on CA AB 2273, The Age-Appropriate Design Code Act). Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws? Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s SocialMedia Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. Analysis of CA AB587).
The picture of a boy, Yusuf Alabi with his arms wide open and standing in front of the campaign convoy of one of the popular presidential candidates, Peter Obi of the Labour Party , went viral across socialmedia. The photographer, Esther Umoh called this person out for copyright infringement on socialmedia platform “X”.
I’m ignoring the complicating effects of various socialmedia censorship laws that may require Internet services to enforce their TOSes as written, a requirement I think is unconstitutional). It’s not hard to imagine how a negligent design claim could have been structured here. Case citation : Freethinker v.
“Identifying content of socialmedia users requires monitoring third-party content. Plaintiffs try to avoid Section 230 immunity, insisting, in the Lemmon lingo, that they are seeking to hold Snap liable for Snap’s actions and negligent design. Not disputed. Publisher/Speaker Claims. ” Third-Party Content.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content