This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs appealed.
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. Papaya counterclaimed for the same causes of action and added trademark and copyright infringement as well as defamation and civil conspiracy claims. The conclusory allegation that a reasonable consumer.
” I’ll focus on the falsedesignation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. Troia claimed that he did not use the LoanStreet trademark in commerce. Just referencing a trademark on the Internet does not support a trademark claim, full stop. the SMJ case. Case Citation : LoanStreet, Inc.
17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Natera, Inc., 19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. Natera made superiority claims for its Prospera.
7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” Similar searches were also “frustrating”; Melwani alleged that the search results were “erroneous, scattershot, mingled” as well as “consistently confusing, misleading, false, and deceptive.” Falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising: Lasoff v.
Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or service marks were. It argued that defendants copied, but didn’t identify a particular word, name, or symbol, or combination thereof, within the highlighted paragraphs, as the alleged trademark(s).
27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and falsedesignation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No.
The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place this year at Harvard. We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law.
Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived. And they allegedly copied golf courses created on Perfect Golf’s course design platform. Eventually, in 2023, the trademark owners of the St. Andrews and various PGA Tour courses.
It has trademark registrations for the word mark “NEO4J.” The parties previously partnered nonexclusively so that PureThink would sell and support the commercial version of Neo4j; upon termination, PureThink expressly agreed to “cease using any trademarks, service marks and other designations of Plaintiffs.”
Is it about the exclusive right to use a trademark – “butter chicken” or the “look and feel” of a restaurant?; or falseadvertising – the defendant claims to be the ‘inventor of Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani’; or is there an actual ‘invention’ in question – owners of both restaurants call themselves ‘inventors’ of the dish?
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. The district court found that these violations caused harm because they “were designed to create a false continuity between Italian VSL#3 and the De Simone Formulation so that VSL#3 could keep its prior customers and potentially poach new ones.”
The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place this year at Harvard. We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law.
Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2023 The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place in person hosted this year at NYU. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
LVSA sued Groupon for trademark infringement. Melwani sued Amazon for trademark infringement, dilution, and more. With respect to the trademark claim, the court says the Ninth Circuit’s Multi-Time Machine v. Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless….
Injury: Damages and disgorgement under the Lanham Act require injury (for falseadvertising, not trademark infringement, despite the same statutory language covering both; no, I am not going to stop pointing this out any time soon). And economic analysis is a valid means of proving an injury caused by falseadvertising.
The Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy will host this year’s Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable. The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives.
It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. Instead of protecting consumers, this bill gives trademark owners absolute control over online marketplaces by overturning Tiffany v.
Quincy sued BRYK “under multiple legal theories for making unauthorized sales of products branded with Quincy’s PREVAGEN trademark.” But the unauthorized sale of a genuine product does not violate trademark law. Even after default.
They try to articulate claims for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false association, and falseadvertising. Thus, “[i]n context, the contested button is not false association or falseadvertising.” But there’s leave to amend!
Roblox sued for copyright infringement, falseadvertising, trademark infringement, false association and falsedesignation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and falseadvertising and unfair competition under California law.
sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, falsedesignation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. This case has the potential to define the scope of trademark rights against unauthorized uses in the world of NFTs. Nike currently has multiple pending trademark applications for their NFTs.
Under the Agreement , ABI allegedly acquired assets and intellectual property including the trademark “DRAGMASTER®,” U.S. Trademark Registration No. ABI is further claiming Defendants’ actions constitute falsedesignation of origin and falseadvertising in violation of 15 U.S.C.
also known as TerreMax ) for Trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1) , unfair competition , use of falsedesignations of origin and falseadvertising under 15 U.S.C. Court documents show that Banjo has received a Trademark registration ( No.
11, 2021) A rare bankruptcy/falseadvertising interaction. Of relevance here, Everlog argued that the falseadvertising damages were nondischargeable in bankruptcy. BTL argued that summary judgment was inappropriate because the district court didn’t consider whether the falseadvertising was “malicious.”
GMP owns two federally registered trademarks: the “GOOD MEAT” standard character mark and the “GOOD MEAT BREAKDOWN” design mark. The court denies a preliminary injunction on the trademark claims based on lack of likely success on the merits, but declines to dismiss either infringement or falseadvertising claims.
Falseadvertising: Plaintiffs didn’t allege that Nobelle altered the merchandise in any way; “instead, the false statement arises from implication, from the fact that Nobelle is selling products that are not theirs to sell and, in the case of ‘The Line’ items, products it does not have the authority to sell.”
The operative claims were falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act and coordinate state-law claims. Thus, plaintiff couldn’t show falsity for falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising. to manufacture fresh milk for the community. the origin. the origin.
The Toyota parts sold by Allen Interchange and Toyota bear the same part number, and according to Allen Interchange, are identical in design, function, and quality. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Allen alleged that Toyota’s statements that “[t]he purchase. 14, 2023) This is the trademark side of the case.
3, 2021) The parties compete in the market for custom landscape design services. “[I]n Each webpage that contained one of McCleese’s photos also contained Natorp’s own trademark and copyright symbols at the top and bottom. Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims.
12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary falseadvertising analysis. RectorSeal also sells a product known as the Metacaulk Box Guard.
CC has a recent trademark registration for a design mark “consist[ing] of the stylized wording ‘COLOR COPPER.COM”, [with] a diamond shape between the wording ‘COLOR’ and ‘COPPER’ made up of four smaller diamonds, each diamond having a pattern inside of it,” COPPER.COM disclaimed. There’s no written agreement” will do it.]
However, a work’s copyright expiration does not extinguish any trademark rights that the owner may maintain in that same work. But it is important to remember that any existing trademark protection in them subsists. Further, Disney still owns valid copyright and trademark rights in other, more modern versions of Mickey Mouse.
Steeplechase has a copyright for the book, “Piano Book for Adult Beginners: Teach Yourself How to Play Famous Piano Songs, Read Music, Theory & Technique” and registered trademark rights in STEEPLECHASE ARTS & PRODUCTIONS for, among other things, music instruction books, including for the Piano Book. Was this literally false?
While this may sound a little wacky, it makes sense that Section 230 was designed to ensure that Internet services only need to comply with a single national standard as much as possible. In this way, trademark claims typically avoid violating free speech by addressing misleading commercial speech.
May 25, 2022) Alcon sued Lens.com for federal and state falseadvertising and trademark claims. Alcon alleged that Lens.com infringed its trademark rights (including rights inherited from Novartis AG) by doing so. Likewise, ® and TM symbols let “consumers and competitors know you’re claiming [a] trademark as yours.”
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh.
Jim Adler runs a personal injury law firm that claims trademarks in JIM ADLER, THE HAMMER, TEXAS HAMMER, and EL MARTILLO TEJANO. It bids on the Adler trademarks for “click-to-call” keyword ads. The ads “are designed to display generic terms that consumers might associate with any personal injury firm.”
Scotts alleged rights in its red mark, black trade dress, black label, and yellow barrier design that were allegedly infringed by competitor SBM’s competing products. A product name is placed between the pentagon design and the information bars. At least the court is equally lenient with TM and falseadvertising?
8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for falseadvertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falselyadvertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding.
we could add harm back in to the TM test): defamation has these too; patent/falseadvertising interface requirement of knowing the claim was meritless. I think this is related to my point about asymmetric design against abuse: the fear is almost always of the imagined infringer, not the abusive TM claimant.]
Stiles alleged that it sold knockoff razors instead, infringing her patents, violating trademark and antitrust law, and interfering with her economic interests. The remaining design patent claims also failed. The accused design’s grip was also contoured and textured, not angular and smooth.
24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. the design Peninsula, like PennEngineering, makes floating fasteners with square-in-square designs.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content