This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. That is, falseadvertising was sufficiently pled as to statements that games on Skillzs platforms did not use bots, matched players evenly, and allowed users to withdraw funds at any time. Skillz Platform Inc. Papaya Gaming, Ltd.,
Plaintiffs’ claims sought to hold the dairy farmers directly or contributorily liable under the Lanham Act, and alleged unfair competition/falseadvertising/deceptive trade practices under Hawaii law. Was a false geographic origin claim one for false association, § 1125(a)(1)(A), or falseadvertising, § 1125(a)(1)(B)?
However, with scant followup media attention, this lawsuit (filed in August, dismissed in December) rocket-docketed to failure faster than remanufactured printer cartridges run out of ink. * * * Note: The litigation GoFundMe page is still up. They have raised a total of $150 of their $500k goal. This argument has failed so many times.
In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride and Naloxone) Antitrust Litig., That difficulty is not really unique, but the court is forced to make distinctions because of the unwarranted exclusion of many falseadvertising claims from antitrust consideration.) 3d -, MDL NO. 2445 13-MD-2445, CIV. 16-5073, 2022 WL 3588024 (E.D.
Plaintiffs allegd both direct and contributory falseadvertising, which requires (1) that the “third party in fact directly engaged in falseadvertising that injured the plaintiff” and (2) “that the defendant contributed to that conduct either by knowingly inducing, or causing the conduct, or by materially participating in it.”
pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising. Defendants challenged whether plaintiffs identified any false or misleading statements by defendants. In Baldino’s Lock & Key Serv., Google, Inc., App’x 81 (4th Cir. weren’t the Defendants’ certifications at all.…
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. Also, a press release that discussed separate litigation in Italy about who owned VSL#3’s bacterial strains, unfairly compared VSL#3 and Visbiome referred to plaintiffs’ “aggressive efforts to sell their competing, generic probiotic product.”
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y.
In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust Litig., 17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-falseadvertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D. Plaintiff Sanofi failed to show a triable issue of fact on (1), (5), and (6).
11, 2021) A rare bankruptcy/falseadvertising interaction. Of relevance here, Everlog argued that the falseadvertising damages were nondischargeable in bankruptcy. BTL argued that summary judgment was inappropriate because the district court didn’t consider whether the falseadvertising was “malicious.”
The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). FalseAdvertising. This lawsuit relates to the “Toast Plus” app that was available in Apple’s app store. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008. Apple , and Evans v.
Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. However, this case’s litigation approach is problematic. .” Both apps allegedly were not responsive enough to complaints or unmasking requests, including not following their own purported policies.
” On remand, after 2 more years of litigation, the district court has again dismissed the lawsuit, this time on its lack of merits. Lanham Act FalseAdvertising. Enigma claimed it was false for Malwarebytes to call its programs “malicious,” “threats,” and PUPs. In Asurvio v.
The operative claims were falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act and coordinate state-law claims. Thus, plaintiff couldn’t show falsity for falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising. to manufacture fresh milk for the community. the origin. the origin.
Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” falsedesignation of origin, and falseadvertising.
HBL argued that, based on the parties’ communications, Lite-Netics should have known early on that there was no infringement (consistent with the analysis performed by the district court, which also found that the accused designs didn’t infringe). The litigation privilege did not extend to making baseless claims about infringement.
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh.
After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act falseadvertising. That putatively means that the court would characterize all threat identifications as “advertising.” Today I’m blogging the district court decision after that remand.
In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices. You will also learn what options are available if your competitors are making false or misleading statements in their advertisements.
ABI claims it has attained significant goodwill throughout the United States and the world and that Defendants alleged misleading and falseadvertisements have caused irreparable damage to ABI’s reputation. ABI is further claiming Defendants’ actions constitute falsedesignation of origin and falseadvertising in violation of 15 U.S.C.
In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. What about statements about how a product was “designed”? Elysium said that its proprietary formulation of two ingredients was “designed” to work together synergistically.
May 25, 2022) Alcon sued Lens.com for federal and state falseadvertising and trademark claims. Alcon also allegedly sells a significant number of lenses overseas that are not FDA-compliant, rendering its product packaging for such lenses false and misleading to consumers, including Lens.com. Alcon Vision, LLC v. Lens.com, Inc.,
Or, for that matter, hiQ Labs, who has effectively been run out of business by their ongoing litigation with LinkedIn, and who has been on the losing end of almost every key legal decision in their dispute with LinkedIn. And most website-scraper interactions don’t fit within those scraper-litigation patterns. Just ask BrandTotal.
District Court for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. The opinion was authored by Judge Reyna and the panel included Judge Alan Albright of the U.S.
11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic activity. The Design Manual also included several technical drawings of BRBs, which allegedly infringed plaintiff Core-Brace’s registered drawings. SME Steel Contractors, Inc.
The parties are involved in related patent litigation. Medline also allegedly made “unfounded allegations” that its system was safer and reduced the risk of catheter-induced urinary tract infections (ugh)/that BD’s new design was more likely to cause UTIs. The allegations were sufficient to state a Lanham Act claim.
the [a]rticles subjects to [ ] litigation plaintiff[s] with documented alternative exposures to asbestos that were known to the defendants because of the defendants roles as expert witnesses in the subjects underlying tort cases. Tolling requires plausible allegations that the defendant undertook an affirmative act designed or intended.
In Atari’s case, Judge Fitzwater noted that the Crystal Castles arcade cabinet appeared in the center of nearly every frame of State Farm’s ad, even though parts of the design were obscured by actors and the marquee was replaced with a different title.
Zuluaga told a designer to look at Industria’s website when creating Latinfood’s packaging designs for Zenú and Ranchera and brought one of Industria’s Ranchera labels to the designer’s office. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in falseadvertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. See, e.g., In re Coca-Cola Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litig. (No.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
PG&E asked Eco to design a “cutout cover” to prevent animals from coming into contact with “cutouts,” a type of electrical device that rests atop utility poles. The resulting ECC-3, which is designed for cutouts made out of porcelain, is Eco’s most successful product and is also sold to other utility companies.
6, 2024) This is the latest decision in long-running litigation over Malwarebytes’ characterization of Enigma’s competing cybersecurity and anti-malware software as “malicious,” a “threat,” and as a Potentially Unwanted Program (“PUP”). Enigma Software Gp. Malwarebytes Inc., 2024 WL 2883671, No. 17-cv-02915-EJD (N.D. The court disagreed.
Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising. Will Freeman focuses his practice on patent litigation in U.S.
There are a number of opinions in this case—the judge spent time on this rather unusual falseadvertising analysis in a bankruptcy case, including taking care with the expert evidence. Plaintiff Verde designated its current CEO, Sundby, as a non-retained expert witness.
The complaint details efforts to post purchased positive reviews through “‘drip campaigns’ which involve ‘the steady flow of reviews’” that were designed to make the reviews appear natural and organic. We will be watching this case closely as it proceeds in litigation.
26, 2022) This opinion resolves challenges to expert testimony in a falseadvertising class action under NY’s GBL challenging the advertising of Joint Juice as touting benefits of a useless product; both parties win and lose some. Premier Nutrition Corp., 2022 WL 1225031, No. 16-cv-06980-RS (N.D.
It alleged that the Philips defendants, who make such devices, engaged in falseadvertising about one of SoClean’s devices in order to deflect blame for the Philips devices’ design defects. In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. 2023 WL 8006602, MDL No. 22-542 (W.D. Roussel Corp., 2d 460 (D.N.J.
While being green or eco-friendly is generally a positive attribute, recent enforcement and litigation activity demonstrates that holding yourself out as a green company and making green claims is not without its risks. There is a limited regulatory framework around green claims, making it prime for litigation.
Neurelis received orphan drug designation from the FDA for its Valtoco for management of ARS in 2015. It then received fast strack designation, which allowed it priority review, and filed an NDA for Valtoco in 2018; this was pending at the time of the operative complaint. Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th
In re Natera Prenatal Testing Litig., In another falseadvertising case challenging the undisclosed presence of child and slave labor in the supply chain, the Ninth Circuit rejected the existence of any duty to disclose because “the labor practices in question. 22-cv-00985-JST, 2023 WL 3370737, -- F.
Marketing materials related to the 2016 version designate the same three valleys as “Regions of Origin,” and describes them as “premiere growing regions along Oregon’s coast.” The 2017 label also references the “coast” and includes a map of Oregon with leaves denoting the locations of the Willamette, Umpqua, and Rogue Valleys.
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Products Liability Litig., 3, 2021)This MDL litigation centers on contamination—actual or threatened—of groundwater from various defendants’ use of the gasoline additive MTBE and/or tertiary butyl alcohol, a product formed by the breakdown of MTBE in water. 2021 WL 3371938, No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content