This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).
In reliance, AHBP allegedly hired employees and designers, consulted with lawyers, accountants, biologists and virologists, rented warehouse and office space, and entered into contracts with buyers in Argentina. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.
ICC publishes revised I-Codes every three years, and it also publishes custom codes that reflect versions of the codes as adopted by states and local governments (the “Custom Codes”). UpCodes, Inc., 2021 WL 1236106, Nos. 6261 (VM) & 20 Civ. 4316 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. That’s costly.
It has more than 400 commercial customers, including global enterprises such as Walmart, Comcast, Cisco, and eBay, and also does substantial business with government agencies, including US agencies. Government. Neo4j ultimately considered PureThink’s Neo4j Government Edition to be a problem.
23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No. 22-CV-6124 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Among other claims, the AG brought NYGBL Sections 349 and 350 claims against them.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. The design elements use “a contrasting font color” making the notice legible on the dark background. The account formation process included a screen where a user could proceed only by clicking on the “play” button: Warner Bros.
8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for falseadvertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falselyadvertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding.
This case is a strong reminder to pay close attention to all procedural rules governing a case, including specifically all Local Rules of the District and any Scheduling Orders and/or Standing Orders issued by the Judge. Thus, the Court summarily denied the motion to dismiss.
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh. For example, in the McNeil v.
In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices. You will also learn what options are available if your competitors are making false or misleading statements in their advertisements.
11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic activity. The Design Manual also included several technical drawings of BRBs, which allegedly infringed plaintiff Core-Brace’s registered drawings. SME Steel Contractors, Inc. This was ambiguous.
LFI allegedly used the “concepts, designs and ideas” from GDI’s samples to launch a new line of products with a larger cosmetics company, Morphe. reached the point of exasperation, terminated the agreement with Glamour Dolls, and contacted the Federal Government. Insider Inc.
But if I stopped what I was doing to write a personal message every time I saw a blogger with no legal background shilling for a web-scraping company or a half-asleep aggregator journalist [FN] spewing ignorance online about the laws that govern web scraping, I wouldn’t get out much.
To Be or Not To Be (Design): Calcutta HC Sways Against Trend of Denying Design Registrations Over GUIs Image from here Can a GUI be regarded as a Design? In what follows, Rahul Bajaj sets out the key arguments of the parties and the holding of the court, along with his analysis of the judgment.
While this may sound a little wacky, it makes sense that Section 230 was designed to ensure that Internet services only need to comply with a single national standard as much as possible. Based on the ccBill precedent, a number of Ninth Circuit-governed courts have applied Section 230 to publicity rights claims. See, e.g., Ripple v.
Tofurkey is not aware of a single consumer communication sent to Tofurky or to any government agency complaining that a consumer mistakenly believed Tofurky’s plant-based meat products were, or contained meat, from slaughtered animals.” Considering the label as a whole, the court found Tofurky’s use of the terms not inherently misleading.
6, 2023) Norman sued Gerber for allegedly falselyadvertising its baby food/infant formula products as “NON GMO Not Made With Genetically Engineered Ingredients” on the front of the package, and also on the back above the ingredients list. Gerber Prods. 2023 WL 122910, No. 21-cv-09940-JSW (N.D.
9, 2021) Alleged ambiguity didn’t save AB from this falseadvertising claim. National” appears prominently throughout the regulatory scheme and “is consistently associated with the federal program that governs any mention, use, or display of the official USDA organic seal or label. Suzie's Brewery Company v. 3:21-cv-178-SI (D.
This case is a strong reminder to pay close attention to all procedural rules governing a case, including specifically all Local Rules of the District and any Scheduling Orders and/or Standing Orders issued by the Judge. Thus, the Court summarily denied the motion to dismiss.
The complaint details efforts to post purchased positive reviews through “‘drip campaigns’ which involve ‘the steady flow of reviews’” that were designed to make the reviews appear natural and organic. Postal Office commercial facility address.” But we leave with two closing thoughts.
Businesses harm consumers only in a few ways—falseadvertising, monopoly prices, defective products. If the law says that Google is a common carrier, expecting more speech governance is irrational. Essential facilities is designed to deal w/a specific kind of bottleneck—telecom, bridge, road—a channel that’s needed.
Marketing materials related to the 2016 version designate the same three valleys as “Regions of Origin,” and describes them as “premiere growing regions along Oregon’s coast.” In 2018, the federal government forced Copper Cane to alter the labels after determining that they were misleading. with “Purely Elouan, Always Coastal.”
The complaint alleged that, “Coinbase, based on in-depth, empirical data from a previous sweepstakes, knew that the wording, design, and presentation of their Dogecoin sweepstakes advertisements would cause most users never to see the information about the alternative ways to enter on the separate ‘rules and details’ webpage.”
An item that is made from recyclable material, but, because of its shape, size, or some other attribute, is not accepted in recycling programs, should not be marketed as recyclable.” But Colgate hasn’t received such an exemption. Finally, plaintiffs had standing to seek injunctive relief because they wanted to buy recyclable toothpaste tubes.
However, Black & Decker did not in fact design, manufacture, distribute, or warrant the coffeemaker. And they argued that “neither the Coffeemaker nor its packaging affirmatively stated that Black & Decker designed, manufactured, distributed, or warranted the Coffeemaker.” The court of appeals disagreed.
Neurelis received orphan drug designation from the FDA for its Valtoco for management of ARS in 2015. It then received fast strack designation, which allowed it priority review, and filed an NDA for Valtoco in 2018; this was pending at the time of the operative complaint. Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th
Also last year, in discussing Environmental, Social, and Governance factors (ESG), then-Acting Chair of the U.S. Based on this purported conduct, the Complaint brings claims for deceptive acts and falseadvertising under the State Unfair and Deceptive Practices Act (a.k.a.
Thus, the document continued, “facilities handling ethers and ether/gasoline blends must be designed and operated to insure (1) low likelihood for spills and leaks, (2) early detection of leaks when they occur, and (3) rapid repair and cleanup when leaks are found.” If it is used, engineering design and site operations.
That the ‘look’ of particular advertisements varied, that different text was used, or that different channels delivered the messages, does not necessarily undermine plaintiffs’ experts’ opinions that the themes and USP were consistent across the relevant time periods.” All these claims predominated over individual issues.
Yet, of the five Shelby trims, the Base and Technology trims lacked “transmission and differential coolers,” a feature—originally included as standard on all Shelbys—that is designed to prevent engine overheating. See, e.g., Carriuolo v. 3d 977, 983, 986 (11th Cir.
It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. However, this bill is itself a giant counterfeit. What’s Regulated? A new frontier for a trade war.].
It’s not hard to imagine how a negligent design claim could have been structured here. First, the plaintiff could have argued that YouTube’s design encourages the production and viewing of illegal animal abuse videos. Case citation : Freethinker v. Google LLC , 2024 WL 2809371 (Cal.
” The falsedesignation of origin claim is similarly governed by the Ninth Circuit’s Lasoff v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. FTC. * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?). Amazon ruling. Reyes & Adler v.
Though the deadline for sharing these comments passed on October 5 and the government is presently working on finalizing the Rules, we received a guest post underlining the need to regulate the menace caused by dark patterns and its interaction with intellectual property rights.
They are “the only software-based neurocognitive tests that have been cleared and designated … as Class II medical devices for use as an aid in the assessment and management of concussions.” Courts do not recognize implied government approval claims in the absence of explicit claims. ImPACT Pediatric is for patients ages 5-11.
The trial court found Ethicon committed 153,351 violations of the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and 121,844 violations of the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL) and imposed a $1,250 civil penalty for each violation. Materiality can also be relevant to whether class treatment is justified in a private FAL/UCL restitution action.
at 997-98, Rogers limited the application of the Lanham Act’s prohibition on falseadvertising “to apply to artistic works only where the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion outweighs the public interest in free expression. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.
The Court noted that the Patents Act is specifically designed to deal with matters concerning allegations of unreasonable conditions in licence agreements, abuse of one’s status as a patentee, the necessary inquiry into these allegations, and eventually the relief that can be granted. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai.
Given that the disputed transfer was pre-1978, it was governed by the common law. “A Lanham Act falsedesignation of origin, unfair competition, and cybersquatting: The complaint identified Henry Darger’s name as the relevant trademark (I don’t see how the Estate can plausibly claim to own it as a mark, but ok).
.” Furthermore, in a mild surprise, the court blesses Google’s “ad” label: “the bolded “Ad” designation next to each of ALG’s advertisements sufficiently distinguishes ALG’s advertisements from the search’s organic results.” LoanStreet v. Reyes & Adler v.
Given its powers under the COVID-19 Act, the government sought not just a permanent injunction, but damages, including recission/restitution/disgorgement, as well as civil penalties. Under Section 12 of the FTC Act, an “advertisement” is a publication that has the “tendency or capability to induce the sale of [a] product.”
Designed in US” can also work. Hecho in Mexico is a certification; must be (majority) produced in Mexico, not precisely corresponding to AOs or GIs, but permit coming from Mexican government. This can include use of flags, eagles. But can use qualifiers like “made in USA of domestic and foreign components.” Mattero v.
Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. Said: note that MLM companies may also have IP troubles [Lularoe and leggings designs], which might also provide an interesting set of comparisons. How do they make that happen?
Pom Wonderful characterized the FDCA as designed primarily to protect the health and safety of the public at large rather than to prevent falseadvertising. As the First Circuit said in Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Edge Pharma, LLC, 45 F.4th 4th 479 (1st Cir. in the absence of explicit claims.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content