This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Patents and SPCs Rose Hughes reviewed the capabilities and limitations of AI-powered software designed to assist in patent drafting. St Atilla discussed the EUIPO's decision to uphold the trademark protection for "KIM KARDASHIAN," highlighting the importance of reputation in trademarklaw.
At trial, American focused primarily on its trademark infringement and unfair competition claims, arguing that Skiplagged misled consumers by making itself appear like an authorized agent of the airline, in part by using American’s logo in ways that could cause confusion. Here, the jury sided with the airline, awarding $4.7
To answer that and other questions about Halloween costumes, we have to step back and look at how copyright and trademarklaw apply to costumes. Costumes are considered “useful articles” and, similar to most of the fashion industry , does not qualify for any kind of copyright protection. . Copyright and Halloween Costumes.
Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademarklaw area, and was one of the signatories of the First Amendment Professors amicus brief filed in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. by guest blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.
This article seeks to examine how trademarklaw interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. C) Any non-commercial use of a mark.
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 1125(c)(3)(A).
.” Most of the opinion discusses the trademark implications of Ripps’ rival NFT collection. With that framing, trademarklaw protects against the unwanted competition, and the court treats this as an easy rightsowner win. Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v.
The post Designer Skin v. The remaining issues in the case, you may recall, were copyright infringement and Arizona unfair competition. Here is the status per this morning’s minute entry in the court’s electronic case. S&L Vitamins trial update appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
A fundamental principle of trademarklaw permits the owner of a well-known trademark to forbid third parties from using it in a manner that would lessen its distinctiveness. In accordance with a provision of trademarklaw known as trademark dilution, the owner of a brand may.
I don’t understand the shirt’s message, but it clearly has a message unrelated to Car-Freshner’s trademark rights. I see potential legitimate trademark defenses for the design. Trademark Claims Car-Freshner submitted trademark takedown notices to Facebook and Instagram over four user-listed items.
The decision is here; the minute entry on the electronic docket reads as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW – that S & L Vitamins has […] The post Fat lady sings: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in Designer Skin v S & L Vitamins appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
What the second Circuit did say was that, like in the Jack Daniel’s case, the Wavy Baby used plaintiff’s trademarks and trade dress throughout the design of its product. But especially in a case of an alleged parody, that doesn’t answer the trademarkuse question.
Ramsey of the University of San Diego School of Law have just published an article on a very timely topic: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression," 72 American University Law Review 1179 (2023). These defensive trademark doctrines, however, are narrow and often vary by jurisdiction.
Thus, it does not have the requisite degree of distinctiveness to support a finding of dilution, at least vis-à -vis respondent’s use of the term as part of the mark SPAM ARREST for computer software designed to eliminate unsolicited commercial email. The post Hormel canned appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
The case arose from Jack Daniel’s complaint about VIP’s sale of a dog toy designed to resemble a bottle of Jack Daniel’s whiskey. As shown below, there is no question that the VIP bottle is designed to resemble the Jack Daniels bottle, although several of the notable components are modified for comedic purposes.
In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”
In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.
The metaverse acted as a virtual boundary in this design for the future. Any literary work, text, music, videos, 3D paintings, images, software programs, avatar designs, art, or literature will get protection under copyright in the metaverse. that identifies a product or a service that is distinguishable by a common man.
Neglect of IPR law can lead to unintentional infringement, resulting in costly legal disputes. Nevertheless, awareness about dispute settlement strategies can minimise the economic and legal costs of ignoring IPR law.
A trademark can be attacked in a variety of ways, most frequently through arguments that the mark is: Generic, Abandoned for non-use, Misrepresentation to the Trademark Office, and Fairuse. 80 (1950) trademark rights were lost because the mark ESCALATOR had become generic and therefore lost its trademark status.
In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”
The Court noted that the Patents Act is specifically designed to deal with matters concerning allegations of unreasonable conditions in licence agreements, abuse of one’s status as a patentee, the necessary inquiry into these allegations, and eventually the relief that can be granted. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai.
NAACP—these courts very clearly say that trademarklaw applies to commercial speech, defined as it is in First Amendment case law, and not to noncommercial speech. Thus, it may not even be descriptive fairuse to use the name of the religion from which the dissenters have parted. The 9th Circuit in Bosley v.
Within just over a month, a raft of barely-underground Discord servers like AI Hub have popped up to provide users with access to software—and step-by-step instructions—for creating new songs using hundreds of community-made AI models designed to mimic specific artists’ voices.
Respondent VIP Products makes a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s whiskey. The trademarklaw provides that the “noncommercial” use of a mark cannot count as dilution. Though not entirely. ” And the descriptive phrase “Old No. 2 On Your Tennessee Carpet.”
Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademarklaw. In addition, the design of the title of the 2013 Documentary was allegedly similar to plaintiffs’ registered 12 O’Clock Boyz logo. The similarities in setting, theme, etc.
I’m not sure what law prevents Google from placing ads over marketing brochures or print ads OTHER THAN COPYRIGHT LAW (or possibly trademarklaw–but at this point, what does any of this have to do with IMPLIED-IN-LAW CONTRACTS?). That can’t possibly be right. Implications.
Cybersquatting is another type of trademark infringement. TrademarkLaw Before pre-digitalization The USTrademark Office (USPTO) defines a trademark as a word, phrase, design, or symbol that serves to identify and distinguish the products or services you sell apart from those of others.
On January 14, 2022, Hermès filed a trademark infringement and dilution lawsuit against Mason Rothschild, the designer of MetaBirkin Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), a collection of 100 fur-covered Birkin-shaped bags, which launched in December 2021 on the NFT exchange platform OpenSea. . Is this FairUse? Hermès’ Action.
From a trademarklaw perspective, however, the decision as to whether or not such a separate classification is necessary will depend on consumer experience with these goods and whether consumers perceive these ‘virtual goods’ as definable and having inherent value.
In general, any clothing, including costumes, is not protected by copyright laws. In Canada, under section 64(2) of the Copyright Act , it is not an infringement of copyright to reproduce the design of a “useful article”, so long as more than 50 copies are made. In Pyrrha Design Inc. There are notable exceptions.
Ornamental use may help to maintain rights even if core uses cease. Can it be used in different ways in TM as a thumb on the scale rather than a binary? 2d Cir in Descriptive fairuse—how “pure” is the descriptive character of the use? Ilanah Simon: In Europe, you can’t use overlap to police boundaries.
The ability to protect cultural works as trademarks disrupts these goals, by affording trademark owners more communication power than other speakers and preventing works from ever entering the public domain. At this stage, the picture for cultural follow-on innovation appears bleak. However, all this is just nit-picking.
Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademarkuse is the central concern of trademarklaw. But what is TM use? Kagan describes it as “designation of source.” How would you design it?
VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fairuse” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” ( at 36 ). .” That remains in the realm of the art critic.
IPR and Political Party Symbols: A Delicate Balance Intellectual Property law aims to foster creativity and innovation but also imposes specific limitations, especially relevant in the context of political symbols. In this way, protecting political symbols under trademarklaw could undermine the core values of democracy and public service.
19 The distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the perception of the relevant public (see judgment of 12 February 2004, Henkel, C‑218/01, EU:C:2004:88, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited).
However, it provides both good challenges and opportunities under trademarklaw. The blog covers how trademarks evolve in the era of social media and influencer marketing, analyzing legal uncertainties, protection mechanisms, and best practices for commercial usage. Therefore, a brand can be registered in the U.S.
But even if the n-word isn’t unregistrable because it’s scandalous or disparaging, it may still be unregistrable because it already has so much expressive meaning that it’s simply incapable of adding a trademark function. failure to function can be significant in ordinary cases with uncontroversial subject matter.
Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademarklaw area, and recently wrote a paper with Professor Christine Haight Farley that focuses on speech-protective doctrines in trademark infringement law.] By Guest Blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.
The holding is that the First Amendment does not require any special scrutiny in cases where the accused activity is “the use of trademarks as trademarks.” ” Rather in this use-as-a-mark situation, standard principles of trademarklaw apply. 1125(c)(3)(A).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content