Intepat

DECEMBER 18, 2024

Pidilite contended that the defendant’s mark and packaging were designed to mislead consumers into believing there was an association with Pidilite’s products, thereby benefiting from Pidilite’s established goodwill. Design Trademarks in Fashion and Sports: Adidas India v.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Trademark Copyright Television 52

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 28, 2025

The application relies on the IPTV technology (Internet Protocol over Television) which provides delivery of audio/visual/graphic/textual data over IP-based networks. In effect, since DRM impacts the very design of the content, access for legitimate/fair use such as criticism, parody, educational purposes, etc.

IP 58

IP Copyright Infringement Copyright Copyright Law 58

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 6, 2024

The plaintiffs also point to what they say are striking similarities in the composition of the band characters, key scenes they claim are lifted straight from the memoir, and even the set design, which positions the audience in a recording studio, echoing Caillat’s perspective from behind the glass.

Art 126

Art Copyright Copying Copyright Law 126

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 13, 2022

Those arguments were that (1) Take-Two’s use of the tattoos was authorized by an implied license, (2) the fair use doctrine insulates their utilization of the tattoos and (3) the tattoos constitute a de minimis part of the video game. The District Court also found that the use was not fair use.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Licensing Copying 52

Velocity of Content

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

At present, YouTube certainly has many other aspects, included music, television-like programming, and live streaming, but I am not going to get into those.). Note that the algorithm does not work perfectly — most prominently, it doesn’t understand the US legal doctrine of fair use very well. (To

Copyright 113

Copyright Social Media Licensing Publishing 113

Greenspoon Marder LLP

AUGUST 15, 2017

Recently, Take-Two filed a motion for summary judgment in federal court asserting that the appearance of the tattoos in “NBA 2K” video games is protected by the fair use and de minimus use doctrines. The other copyright doctrine of fair use may also protect Take-Two’s reproduction of the tattoos.

Copyright 40

Copyright Fair Use Design Designs 40

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 1, 2023

As a practical matter, the answer is certainly yes; an open system is built into the design of the internet. To ‘display’ a work means to show a copy of it, either directly or by means of a film, slide, television image, or any other device or process.” The question is whether the same is true as a legal matter.) 3d at 1160.

Blogging 98

Blogging Copying Social Media Copyright 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

On November 16, 2021, film and television studio Miramax, LLC (“Miramax”) sued Tarantino and his company Visiona Romantica, Inc. 26] The defendants denied many of the allegations in the complaint, and asserted several affirmative defenses, including that the NFTs fell under the fair use exception to the Copyright Act. [27]

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Brands 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 8, 2021

The video depicted its award as the well-known Emmy statuette with a coronavirus replacing the atom in the holder’s hands: The Television Academies, who own the IP rights to the statuette, targeted the video with a DMCA notice to YouTube, which YouTube honored. Copyright Infringement/Fair Use. Goodman counternoticed.

Fair Use 135

Fair Use Television Cease and Desist Copyright 135

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 15, 2021

The precedent work is “a set of replacement stickers for the dashboard climate controls for certain GM vehicles”: The Copyright Office registered this design. Defendant had not obtained the Deposit Design from the Copyright Office. Defendant had not tried to find out why Amazon kept reinstating Plaintiff’s listing.

Registration 132

Registration Fair Use Copyright Designs 132

Velocity of Content

JUNE 8, 2022

Beginning in 1955, adaptations of the stage play for television begin. But it is mainly, statistically accurate, and I really, really felt like including it here. This is probably a good place to pause and explain the concept of “derivative works” in copyright. This is not to say that they are legally suspect.

Derivative Work 105

Derivative Work Public Domain Copyright Fair Use 105

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

Relying extensively on the rationale of the Single Judge’s order, the Division Bench held that Section 31D specifically deals only with Radio and Television Broadcasting. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. Microsoft Technology Licensing v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

The copyright claims came down to a fair use analysis, something that has occupied discussions by this poster before. ” With a mixed bag present on the substantial similarity analysis, the District Court moved on to looking at fair use itself. .” Let’s see why.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 24, 2024

For a successful UDRP claim, three conditions must be met: the domain name must be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark owned by the complainant, the registrant must have no rights or legitimate interests in the domain, and the domain must be registered and used in bad faith.

Registration 74

Registration Trademark Intellectual Property Law Television 74

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 21, 2023

The other issue in Jack Daniel’s was whether VIP could invoke the “noncommercial use of a mark” exemption from dilution liability in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design.

Trademark 105

Trademark Blogging Trademark Law Fair Use 105

Copyright Lately

DECEMBER 12, 2022

(If you thought the Bret Kavanaugh hearings were riveting, picture a C-SPAN camera trained on a 19-inch tube TV as a room full of geriatric senators are forced to sit through “Hot For Teacher” and “We’re Not Gonna Take It” on live television.). “Clean,” “Pretty” and Fair.

Copyright 111

Copyright Music Fair Use Social Media 111

LexBlog IP

APRIL 20, 2022

As described here in a previous post: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected an artistic intent or purpose test for fair use on March 26, 2021, in The Andy Warhol Foundation v. ” Then, as I noted , the US Supreme Court decided a few days later, “in Google v. at 7-9) were transformative.,”

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Music Copyright Fair Use 52